Back
Prognostic Factors of Induction of Labor with Misoprostol at CHUD/B in Parakou, Benin in 2016
K. Salifou, I. R. Sidi, M. Vodouhe, A. A. A. Obossou, G. Tikandé, E. Alihonou
Open J. Obstet. Gynecol. Vol.8 No.4, April 04, 2018  DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2018.84033
       (PDF  222K)     HTML      XML
Low-Dose Misoprostol versus Vaginal-Insert Dinoprostone for At-Term Labor Induction: A Prospective Cohort Study
Laura Emilia Muñoz Saá, María Dolores Martín Ríos, María Rosario Noguero Meseguer
Open J. Obstet. Gynecol. Vol.7 No.8, August 02, 2017  DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2017.78083
       (PDF  275K)     HTML      XML
Maternal and perinatal outcomes of induction of labor at term in the university clinics of Kinshasa, DR Congo
Barthélémy Tandu-Umba, Robert Laala Tshibangu, Andy Mbangama Muela
Open J. Obstet. Gynecol. Vol.3 No.1, February 04, 2013  DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2013.31A029
       (PDF  114K)     HTML      XML
Spontaneous versus Induced Labor Delivery, a Retrospective Analysis
D. Alalem, S. Kafy, H. Hashim, L. Aldukkan, H. Bajahmom
Adv. Reprod. Sci. Vol.7 No.1, December 05, 2018  DOI: 10.4236/arsci.2019.71001
       (PDF  239K)     HTML      XML
Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Comparison between Vaginal Misoprostol versus Foley’s Catheter Placement in a Nigeria Tertiary Hospital
Matthew Igwe Nwali, Joseph Agboeze, Vitus Okwuchukwu Obi, Arinze C. Ikeotuonye, Ikechukwu Ogwudu Ugadu, Emmanuel Ajuluchukwu Ugwa
Open J. Obstet. Gynecol. Vol.11 No.3, March 11, 2021  DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2021.113024
       (PDF  272K)     HTML      XML
 
 
Top