Back
 OJL  Vol.9 No.1 , March 2020
The Relationship of Coaching Leadership and Innovation Behavior: Dual Mediation Model for Individuals and Teams across Levels
Abstract: In the face of the accelerated upgrading of the market and the increasingly fierce competition, innovation has become an important driving force for the survival and development of enterprises. As a new way of management and an important way to develop the ability of employees, coach leadership has its unique advantages in promoting employee innovation, and it has been paid more and more attention by scholars and practitioners. Based on the current situation of Chinese enterprise management, this study discusses the relationship between coaching leadership and employee innovation behavior, and explores the interactive mechanism from the team level and individual level. This study takes the on-the-job team leaders and their subordinates in enterprises in South China as the research object to explore and verify the effect of coaching leadership on employees’ advice behavior and the intermediary mechanism of team mindfulness and employee innovation process input. The results show that: 1) coaching leadership has a significant positive impact on employee innovation behavior; 2) team mindfulness plays an intermediary role in the relationship between coaching leadership and employee innovation behavior; 3) employee innovation process engagement plays an intermediary role in the relationship between coaching leadership and employee innovation behavior; 4) team mindfulness has a significant positive impact on employees’ innovation process engagement, and coaching leaders influence innovation behavior through the chain intermediary between team mindfulness and employees’ innovation process engagement.
Cite this paper: Zhang, X. (2020) The Relationship of Coaching Leadership and Innovation Behavior: Dual Mediation Model for Individuals and Teams across Levels. Open Journal of Leadership, 9, 70-83. doi: 10.4236/ojl.2020.91005.
References

[1]   Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357

[2]   Anderson, V. (2013). A Trojan Horse? The Implications of Managerial Coaching for Leadership Theory. Human Resource Development International, 16, 251-266.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2013.771868

[3]   Baas, M., Nevicka, B., & Ten Velden, F. S. (2014). Specific Mindfulness Skills Differentially Predict Creative Performance. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1092-1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214535813

[4]   Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands-Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 273-285.
https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

[5]   Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Sleebos, D. M., & Maduro, V. (2014). Uncovering the Underlying Relationship between Transformational Leaders and Followers’ Task Performance. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13, 194-203.
https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000118

[6]   Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical Foundations and Evidence for Its Salutary Effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211-237.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701598298

[7]   Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2011). The Job Demands-Resources Model: Challenges for Future Research. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37, a974.
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v37i2.974

[8]   Demerouti, E., Nachreiner, F., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The Job Demands-Resources Model of Burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

[9]   Jiang, J., & Yang, B. (2015). Roles of Creative Process Engagement and Leader-Member Exchange in Critical Thinking and Employee Creativity. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 43, 1217-1231.
https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.7.1217

[10]   Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The Role of Transformational Leadership in Enhancing Organizational Innovation: Hypotheses and Some Preliminary Findings. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525-544.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X

[11]   Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Dimitrova, N. G., & Sels, L. (2013). Mindfulness, Authentic Functioning, and Work Engagement: A Growth Modeling Approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 238-247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.01.012

[12]   Özduran, A., & Tanova, C. (2017). Coaching and Employee Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: The Role of Procedural Justice Climate. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 58-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.004

[13]   Piyathasanan, B., Mathies, C., Patterson, P., & Ruyter, K. D. (2018). The Value of Crowd-Sourcing: Antecedents and Value Creation of Creative Process Engagement. Journal of Service Marketing, 32, 19-33.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2017-0044

[14]   Sacramento, C. A., Fay, D., & West, M. A. (2013). Workplace Duties or Opportunities? Challenge Stressors, Regulatory Focus, and Creativity. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 121, 141-157.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.008

[15]   Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
https://doi.org/10.2307/256701

[16]   Smither, J. W., London, M., Flautt, R., Vargas, Y., & Kucine, I. (2003). Can Working with an Executive Coach Improve Multisource Feedback Ratings over Time? A Quasi Experimental Field Study. Personnel Psychology, 56, 23-44.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00142.x

[17]   Vogus, T. J., & Welbourne, T. M. (2010). Structuring for High Reliability: HR Practices and Mindful Processes in Reliability-Seeking Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 877-903.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.221

[18]   Yu, L., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. (2018). Introducing Team Mindfulness and Considering Its Safeguard Role against Conflict Transformation and Social Undermining. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 324-347.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0094

[19]   Yuan, L., Zhang, L. L., & Tu, Y. H. (2018). When a Leader Is Seen as Too Humble: A Curvilinear Mediation Model Linking Leader Humility to EMPLOYEE CREATIVE Process Engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39, 468-481.
https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2017-0056

[20]   Zhang, W. W., & Feng, T. T. (2016). The Effect of Psychological Capital on Employee Creativity: The Role of Creative Process Engagement and the Learning Goal Orientation. 2016 3rd International Conference on Management Innovation and Business Innovation (ICMIBI 2016), 58, 803-808.

[21]   Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). The Influence of Creative Process Engagement on Employee Creative Performance and Overall Job Performance: A Curvilinear Assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 862-873.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020173

[22]   Zhou, Q., & Pan, W. (2015). A Cross-Level Examination of the Process Linking Transformational Leadership and Creativity: The Role of Psychological Safety Climate. Human Performance, 28, 405-424.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2015.1021050

[23]   Zivnuska, S., Kacmar, K. M., Ferguson, M., & Carlson, D. S. (2016). Mindfulness at Work: Resource Accumulation, Well-Being, and Attitudes. Career Development International, 21, 106-124.
https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-06-2015-0086

 
 
Top