AiM  Vol.10 No.3 , March 2020
In Vitro Antagonistic Activity of Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens against Colletotrichum acutatum
Abstract: Biological control of plant diseases makes extensive use of the antagonists. The effectiveness of the control depends on the choice of an effective antagonist strains from criteria of implying a good knowledge of biological peculiarities of the material used. In this study, the antagonistic activities of nine isolates of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and one isolate of Trichoderma harzianum were tested in vitro against seven strains of Colletotrichum acutatum, the causal agent of strawberry anthracnose. It was found that T. harzianum and B. amyloliquefaciens strains showed the ability to inhibit the mycelial growth of the pathogen by dual culture technique by more than 50 percent. The nonvolatile substances produced by the antagonists showed high inhibition percentages that are more than 99 percent, meanwhile their volatile compounds inhibited the mycelial growth of C. acutatum strains with low inhibition percentages starting from 30 percent except the substances produced by B. amyloliquefaciens Bc2 that showed a high inhibition percentage of more than 70 percent.

1. Introduction

Dissemination of phytopathogens has been detected from nurseries to plantations through asymptomatic plants. Consumers require less chemical residues on products and many fungi have developed resistance to commonly used fungicides [1]. In addition, the use of chemical pesticides is becoming increasingly restricted due to environmental and health concerns [2] [3].

The antagonistic microorganisms such bacteria and fungi provide an alternative source of control of these pathogens. Biological control is an alternative to the use of chemical pesticides with the benefits of greater consumer acceptance and reduced environmental impact.

In addition, microbial diversity in soil is considered important for maintaining the sustainability of agricultural production systems. The quantity and activity of microorganisms is a determining factor for the productivity of all types of soil [4].

The selection of antagonists for biological control of plant diseases usually involves collecting and examining a large number of microbial isolates to increase the likelihood of finding a highly effective strain. Natural antagonists on host surfaces are a promising component of organic crop protection [5]. An environmentally friendly biological control using antagonistic bacteria has been successful in controlling many post-harvest pathogens.

Natural compounds produced by bacteria and fungi antagonists are an important source of biopesticides and special conditions are required for the extraction and optimization of secondary metabolites that have an antibiotic effect [6].

In Morocco, the control of anthracnose in cultivated strawberry uses chemical pesticides in spite of their harmful effects. Many pathogenic microorganisms have developed resistance against chemical fungicides. This seriously hampers the management of phytopathologies. Considering the deleterious effects of chemical phytosanitary products on the maintenance of life systems, it is urgent to find an alternative for the management of pathogenic microorganisms. The present work aims to evaluate the antagonistic potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Trichoderma harzianum against Colletotrichum acutatum isolates.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Pathogenic Material

Seven isolates of Colletotrichum acutatum (Ca1, Ca2, Ca3, Ca4, Ca5, Ca6 and Ca7) from naturally infected strawberries with anthracnose symptoms of strawberry field from Loukkos region (Larache, Morocco) were isolated and purified at the laboratory of plant biotechnology in Faculty of Science of Tetouan. They were grown on PDA (Potato Dextrose Agar) medium 7 to 10 days at 25˚C in the dark. Successive subcultures were carried out until complete purification. Their identification was performed by macroscopic and microscopic observations of the isolates using determination keys [7] [8].

2.2. Antagonist Material

2.2.1. Bacterial Antagonists

Nine bacterial strains were isolated by serial dilution from the soil of rhizosphere and strawberry plant roots of the Loukkos region (Larache, Morocco), and identified by [9]. The molecular identification revealed that the nine bacterial isolates are Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Strains were initially noted by an arbitrary notation I1, I2, I3, I18, B3, B12, RA9 and RA12 (Table 1).

2.2.2. Fungal Antagonist

The strain of Trichoderma harzianum (TR) was isolated from the soil in Petri dishes containing PDA using a spreading plate technique. The litter materials were grown in PDA culture medium for isolation. The TR strain was isolated in pure culture on PDA.

2.3. Effect on Mycelial Growth by the Direct Confrontation (Dual Culture)

2.3.1. Trichoderma Harzianum

Trichoderma strain was evaluated against the seven isolates of Colletotrichum by the technique of dual culture [10] [11]. Mycelial discs 5 mm indiameter were excised from the edge of the actively growing antagonist and each pathogen was cultured at the opposite end of a Petri dish at the same distance from the periphery. A completely random experimental setup was used with three replicates for each isolate. The inoculated Petri dishes were incubated at 25˚C ± 1˚C for 5 days. After the incubation period, the radial growth of pathogens was measured and the percent inhibition of mean radial growth was calculated relative to the control as follows:

L = [ ( C T ) / C ] × 100

L: Percent inhibition of radial mycelial growth,

C: Radial growth of the control pathogen,

T: Radial growth of the pathogen in the presence of Trichoderma [12].

Table 1. Identification of antagonist strains of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens [9].

2.3.2. Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens

The dual culture was performed using a mixed culture: a 5-mm diameter mycelial disc from culture of Colletotrichum acutatum was placed at one side of a Petri dish containing PDA medium and a bacterial isolate was seeded at 3.5 cm from the fungal strain in the opposite way. The dishes were incubated for 7 days at 26˚C ± 2˚C. Each treatment was repeated three times. The percent inhibition of radial growth (ICRP) was measured according to the following formula:

PICR = Fungal growth control Fungal growth near the antagonist Control fungal growth × 100

2.4. Effect of Volatile Substances Produced by Antagonists by Remote Confrontation

This method consists in inoculating the antagonist and the pathogenic, in two plates separated thereafter, an assembly is carried out by the superposition of two plates, antagonist in bottom and the pathogenic one in top, the junction between the two plates is ensured by layers of Parafilm in order to avoid all loss of volatile substances [13].

2.4.1. Trichoderma Harzianum

To study the effect of the volatile substances of Trichoderma harzianum on the growth of pathogenic fungi on PDA, two disks (8 mm in diameter), one of the antagonist agent (Trichoderma harzianum) and the other of the pathogen,were placed in the center of two Petri dishes containing the PDA medium. The lids were removed aseptically, and then the bottom of the plate containing Trichoderma was placed below the one containing the phytopathogen, and the two juxtaposed plates were unsured by layers of Parafilm. The cultures were incubated for 4 days at 25˚C. The test was repeated three times [14]. The percent inhibition of radial growth was measured according to the formula used in dual culture method.

2.4.2. Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens

The test of volatile antifungal compounds was carried out according to the method used by [14] [15]. Petri dishes containing LB medium were inoculated with 50 μl of bacterial culture and incubated for 24 hours at 28˚C. A 5 mm diameter mycelial disk of the phytopathogenic fungus was placed in the center of another PDA-containing Petri dish. The lids were removed and the box containing the bacillus was turned face to face on the one with the mycelial disc. The dishes were sealed with Parafilm and incubated at 26˚C for 7 days. Each test was repeated three times. The percent inhibition of radial growth was measured according to the formula used in dual culture method.

2.5. Effect of Non-Volatile Compounds Produced by the Antagonists on the Growth of Colletotrichum acutatum

2.5.1. Suspension Preparation of Trichoderma harzianum

Each Erlenmeyer flask containing 15 ml PDB (Potato Dextrose Broth) was inoculated with a 5 mm diameter disc from the Trichoderma harzianum culture and incubated for 12 days at 25˚C ± 2˚C with shaking at 200 rpm. After this time, the suspension was filtered to remove the mycelium and spores then adjust concentration to 108 conidia/ml by using Malassez cell.

2.5.2. Preparation Suspension of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens

The bacterial strain was grown on Luria Bertani Agar (LBA) 24 h at 28˚C. Then, using a sterile loop, a bacterial culture is prepared by inoculating 50 ml of the liquid medium Luria Bertani Broth with a colony of the strain studied, in a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask. The cultures were incubated at room temperature with 125 rpm shaking for 2 days. After incubation, a volume of 5 ml of bacterial suspension is centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min. The cells were washed, in the same volume of 5 ml of sterile distilled water, twice, using the centrifuge at the same conditions mentioned above [16].

The bacterial cells were then suspended in 5 ml of sterile physiological saline, and the suspension was adjusted to 3 × 108 cell/ml according to the Mac Farland scale [17].

2.5.3. Mixture of Suspension of Antagonist with Pathogen Inoculum

The phytopathogenic fungi (C. acutatum) were inoculated (106 conidia) and cultured in 50 ml of PDB medium for one week at 28˚C at 200 rpm with presence (1% (v/v)) of the antagonist suspensions (B. amyloliquefaciens and TR) already prepared previously. For the control, distilled water was used instead of the antagonists.

The biomass was separated, dried 24 h at 100˚C and weighed to obtain the dry weight. Values were expressed as a percentage:

% inhibition = 1 Dry matter in the presence of the antagonist Dry matter of control × 100

Three repetitions were performed.

3. Results

3.1. Effect on Mycelial Growth by Direct Confrontation (Dual Culture)

In vitro comparison showed that Trichoderma harzianum (Figure 1) and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains inhibit the growth of Colletotrichum acutatumstrains with varying efficiencies (Figure 1, Table 2).

Direct challenge of Trichoderma with C. acutatum isolates resulted in up to 86.64% inhibition of the Ca1 isolate (Figure 2, Figure 3). The Bc2 isolate was effective against C. acutatum with percent inhibition ranging from 79.80% growth of the Ca7 isolate to 92.33% growth of the Ca5 isolate.

3.2. Effect of Volatile Substances Produced by Antagonists by Remote Confrontation

All bacterial isolates produce volatile substances inhibiting mycelial growth of C.

Figure 1. Growth of the Ca6 isolate in the presence of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens isolates: (a) Bc1, (b) Bc2, (c) Bc3, (d) Bc4, (e) Bc5, (f) Bc6, (g) Bc7, (h) Bc8 and (i) Bc9.

Figure 2. Growth of Ca6 isolate (a) without antagonist (b) and in the presence of Trichoderma harzianum.

Figure 3. Inhibition percent of mycelial growth of each isolate of Colletotrichum acutatum by Trichoderma harzianum by direct confrontation.

acutatum isolates. The percentage of inhibition did not exceed 42% for the Bc1, Bc3, Bc4, Bc5, Bc6, Bc7, Bc8 and Bc9 isolates, but in the case of the Bc2 isolate, the inhibition of the Ca5 isolate reached up to at 72% (Table 3, Figure 4).

The volatile substances of Trichoderma harzianum have a variable inhibitory effect depending on the degree of resistance of the isolates of C. acutatum, the percentage inhibition of Ca3, Ca4 and Ca6 exceeding 46% whereas for the other isolates the inhibition is less than 44% (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

3.3. Effect of Non-Volatile Compounds Produced by Antagonists on the Growth of Colletotrichum acutatum

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens filtrates have a strong influence on the growth of Colletotrichum acutatum isolates in liquid medium and the percentage inhibition varies from one bacterial isolate to another insignificantly (Table 4). The same is true for the Trichoderma harzianum filtrate (Figure 6).

4. Discussion and Conclusion

In this study, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Trichoderma harzianum were found to have inhibitory effects against the pathogen Colletotrichum acutatum

Table 2. Inhibition percent of mycelial growth of Colletotrichum acutatum isolates in the presence of nine Bacillus amyloliquefaciens isolates by direct comparison.

Table 3. Percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth of Colletotrichum acutatum isolates by volatile substances produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.

Table 4. Percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth of Colletotrichum acutatum isolates in the presence of nine Bacillus amyloliquefaciens filtrates on PDB.

Figure 4. Growth of Ca6 isolate in the presence of the volatile substances of the bacterial isolates: (a) Bc1, (b) Bc2, (c) Bc3, (d) Bc4, (e) Bc5, (f) Bc6, (g) Bc7, (h) Bc8 and (i) Bc9, (j) in the absence of antagonist and in the presence of the volatile compounds of (k) Trichoderma harzianum.

Figure 5. Percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth of Colletotrichum acutatum isolates by the volatile substances produced by Trichoderma harzianum.

Figure 6. Growth of the Ca6 isolate in the PDB medium: (a) in the absence of antagonist in the presence of the filtrate of (b) I2, (c) Trichoderma harzianum.

causing anthracnose in cultivated strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Biological control is therefore an alternative to the use of chemical plant protection products.

The sensitivity of the isolates of Colletotrichum acutatum appears variable for both bacterial and fungal antagonists. All bacterial isolates and Trichoderma harzianum reduce mycelial growth of C. acutatum isolates. The growth of Trichoderma harzianum seems more marked than that of Colletotrichum acutatum.

The Bc2 isolate has superior antagonistic activity: the Bc2 isolate inhibits the growth of Strain Colletotrichum acutatum from 79.8% to 92.33% in direct confrontation and its volatile substances by 70% to 72% the mycelial growth. The nonvolatile substances of all isolates indiscriminately inhibit the development of Colletotrichum acutatum isolates.

Several studies have been made to evaluate the in vitro antagonism of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens with respect to the development of different phytopathogenic agents: [18] found that all Bacillus spp. in their study as antagonists resulted in a significant reduction in mycelial growth of anthracnose isolates by direct confrontation. Similar results have been reported by [19]. [20] reported that Bacillus were promising bacterial antagonists for the control of plant diseases, because of their simple nutritional requirements, which allow them to colonize on dry surfaces for long periods of time, the rapid use of many available nutrients and endospores resistant to withstand many environmental risks. Bacillus species, including B. amyloliquefaciens [21] [22] [23],significantly reduce the severity of plant pathologies on various hosts under greenhouse or field conditions [24]. B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens have been used in commercial biological control products because of their excellent antagonistic effects and high stability under harsh environmental conditions [25].

The results of this study revealed that Trichoderma harzianum has a high inhibitory effect against different isolates of C. acutatum at three life stages. Its growth during the confrontation is faster than that of the pathogen (Figure 2(b)), hence a significant advantage in the competition for space and nutrients, even before deploying its arsenal of mycotoxins [26]. Pathogen development is inhibited by volatile (Figure 4) and non-volatile compounds produced by the antagonists (Figures 6-8). The decrease in mycelial growth of Colletotrichum isolates with T. harzianum is similar to that of Phytophthora cinnamomi with 24 manure fungi including T. harzianum [27].

The use of products based on Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in the fight against phytopathogenic fungi is safe for farmers and consumers and good for the environment. However, much remains to be done

Figure 7. Dry matter of the mycelium of the Ca6 isolate: (a) in the absence of antagonist and in the presence of the filtrate of: (b) I2 and (c) Trichoderma harzianum.

Figure 8. Percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth of seven isolates of Colletotrichum acutatum by Trichoderma harzianum on PDB.

to develop a stable, cost-effective formulation that is easy to produce and apply.

Cite this paper: Es-Soufi, R. , Tahiri, H. , Azaroual, L. , Oualkadi, A. , Martin, P. , Badoc, A. and Lamarti, A. (2020) In Vitro Antagonistic Activity of Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens against Colletotrichum acutatum. Advances in Microbiology, 10, 82-94. doi: 10.4236/aim.2020.103008.

[1]   Conway, W.S., Leverentz, B., Janisiewicz, W.J., Blodgett, A.B., Saftner, R.A. and Camp, M.J. (2004) Integrating Heat Treatment, Biocontrol and Sodium Bicarbonate to Reduce Postharvest Decay of Apple Caused by Colletotrichum acutatum and Penicillium expansum. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 34, 11-20.

[2]   Mari, M. and Guizzardi, M. (1998) The Postharvest Phase: Emerging Technologies for the Control of Fungal Diseases. Phytoparasitica, 26, 59-66.

[3]   Janisiewicz, W.J. and Korsten, L. (2002) Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 40, 411-441.

[4]   Ribeiro, H., Mucha, A.P., Almeida, C.M.R. and Bordalo, A.A. (2011) Hydrocarbon Degradation Potential of Salt Marsh Plant-Microorganisms Associations. Biodegradation, 22, 729-739.

[5]   De Costa, D.M. and Erabadupitiya, H.R.U.T. (2005) An Integrated Method to Control Postharvest Diseases of Banana Using a Member of the Burkholderiacepacia Complex. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 36, 31-39.

[6]   Dikin, A., Sijam, K., Kadir, J. and Idris, A.S. (2005) Extraction of Antimicrobial Substances from Antagonistic Bacteria against Schizophyllum commune Fr. Proc. 27th Malaysian Microbiology Symposium. Innovation through Microbes. Grand Plaza Parkroyal, Penang, Malaysia, 24-27 November 2005. In: Kadir J., Rahman M. A., Mahmud T.M.M., Abdul Rahman R. and Begum M.M. 2008. Extraction of Antifungal Substances from Burkholderiacepacia with Antibiotic Activity against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on Papaya (Carica papaya L.). Int. J. Agric. Biol., 10, 15-20.

[7]   Smith, B.J. and Black, L.L. (1990) Morphological, Cultural, and Pathogenic Variation among Colletotrichum Species Isolated from Strawberry. Plant Disease, 74, 69-76.

[8]   Talhinhas, P., Sreenivasaprasad, S., Neves-Martins, J. and Oliveira, H. (2002) Genetic and Morphological Characterization of Colletotrichum acutatum Causing Anthracnose of Lupins. Phytopathology, 92, 986-996.

[9]   Hamdache, A., Ezziyyani, M., Alain, B. and Lamarti, A. (2012) Effect of pH, Temperature and Water Activity on the Inhibition of Botrytis cinerea by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Isolates. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11, 2210-2217.

[10]   Es-Soufi, R., El Bouzdoudi, B., Bouras, M., El Kbiach, M.L.B., Badoc, A. and Lamarti, A. (2017) Assessment of the Effect of Environmental Factors on the Antagonism of Bacillus amyloliquefaciensand Trichoderma harzianum to Colletotrichum acutatum. Advances in Microbiology, 7, 729-742.

[11]   Morton, D.T. and Stroube, N.H. (1955) Antagonistic and Stimulatory Effects of Microorganism upon Sclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology, 45, 419-420.

[12]   Edington, L.V., Khew, K.L. and Barron, G.I. (1971) Fungitoxic Spectrum of Benzimidazole Compounds. Phytopathology, 61, 42-44.

[13]   Mokhtar, H. and Dehimat, A. (2012) Antagonism Capability in Vitro of Trichoderma harzianum against Some Pathogenic Fungi. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 3, 452-460.

[14]   Raza, W., Yang, X., Wu, H., Wang, Y., Xu, Y. and Shen, Q. (2009) Isolation and Characterization of Fusaricidin-Type Compound-Producing Strain of Paenibacilluspolymyxa SQR-21 Active against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. nevium. The European Journal of Plant Pathology, 125, 471-483.

[15]   Jamal, Q., Lee, Y.S., Jeon, H.D., Park, Y.S. and Kim, K.Y. (2015) Isolation and Biocontrol Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Y1 against Fungal Plant Pathogens. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 48, 485-491.

[16]   Zhang, H., Wang, L., Dong, Y., Jiang, S., Cao, J. and Meng, R. (2007) Postharvest Biological Control of Gray Mold Decay of Strawberry with Rhodotorulaglutinis. Biological Control, 40, 287-292.

[17]   Tatagiba, J.D.S., Maffia, L.A., Barreto, R.W., Acelino, C.A. and Sutton, J.C. (1998) Biological Control of Botrytis cinerea in Residues and Flowers of Rose (Rosa hybrida). Phytoparasitica, 26, 1-12.

[18]   Admasu, W., Sahile, S. and Kibret, M. (2014) Assessment of Potential Antagonists for Anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) Disease of Mango (Mangiferaindica L.) in North Western Ethiopia (Pawe). Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 47, 2176-2186.

[19]   Yenjit, P., Intanoo, W., Chamswarng, C., Siripanich, J. and Intana, W. (2004) Use of Promising Bacterial Strains for Controlling Anthracnose on Leaf and Fruit of Mango Caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology, 1, 56-69.

[20]   Sahile, S., Fininsa, C., Sakhula, P.K. and Ahmed, S. (2009) Evaluation of Pathogenic Isolates in Ethiopia for the Control of Chocolate Spot in Faba Bean. African Crop Science Journal, 17, 187-197.

[21]   Kong, H.G., Lee, H.J., Bae, J.Y., Kim, N.H., Moon, B.J. and Lee, S.W. (2010) Spatial and Temporal Distribution of a Biocontrol Bacterium Bacillus licheniformis N1 on the Strawberry Plants. The Plant Pathology Journal, 26, 238-244.

[22]   Lee, K.J., Oh, B.T. and Kamala-Kannan, S. (2013) Advances in Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Biological Control of Plant Diseases. In: Maheshwari, D.K., Ed., Bacteria in Agrobiology: Disease Management, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1-13.

[23]   Wu, J.Y., Zhao, F.Q., Bai, J., Deng, G., Qin, S. and Bao, Q.Y. (2007) Adaptative Evolution of Cry Gene in Bacillus thuringiensis: Implications for Their Specificity Determination. FEBS Letters, 5, 102-110.

[24]   Kloepper, J.W., Ryu, C.M. and Zhang, S. (2004) Induced Systemic Resistance and Promotion of Plant Growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology, 94, 1259-1266.

[25]   Kwak, Y.K., Kim, I.S., Cho, M.C., Lee, S.C. and Kim, S. (2012) Growth Inhibition Effect of Environment-Friendly Farm Materials in Colletotrichum acutatum in Vitro. Journal of Bio-Environment Control, 21, 127-133.

[26]   Barbosa, M.A.G., Rehn, K.G., Menezes, M. and Mariano, R.L.R. (2001) Antagonism of Trichoderma Species on Cladosporium herbarumand Their Enzimatic Characterization. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 32, 98-104.

[27]   Aryantha, P.G. and Guest, D.I. (2006) Mycoparasitic and Antagonistic Inhibition on Phytophthora cinnamomirands by Microbial Agents Isolated from Manure Composts. The Plant Pathology Journal, 5, 291-298.