AJIBM  Vol.10 No.2 , February 2020
Review of the Study of Chinese and Foreign Management Accounting in 2015-2017
Abstract: This paper collates, summarizes and reviews 95 management accounting research literatures published in 6 academic journals and seven foreign journals between 2015 and 2017, and makes a comparative analysis of the research topics, research methods and application theories of management accounting. The results show that compared with the previous management accounting research in China, there have been significant changes in both research topics and research methods and applied theory. Research topics or research hot spots are becoming more diversified, research on Performance appraisal and motivation has increased significantly, research methods are more focused on database-based empirical research and experimental methodology and questionnaires, applied theory is more systematic and comprehensive, the subject background is gradually extended and cross-cutting. However, China’s management accounting compared with foreign countries there is still a big gap; there is still a lot of room for development.
Cite this paper: Yang, L. (2020) Review of the Study of Chinese and Foreign Management Accounting in 2015-2017. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10, 476-491. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2020.102032.

[1]   Bol, J. C. (2008). Subjectivity in Compensation Contracting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 27, 1-24.

[2]   Chen, X. Y., & Huang, J. (2016). Equity Split Reform, Equity Hierarchy and Corporate Performance. Accounting Research, 1, 56-62.

[3]   Chen, Y., Jermias, J., & Panggabean, T. (2016). The Role of Visual Attention in the Managerial Judgment of Balanced-Scorecard Performance Evaluation: Insights from Using an Eye-Tracking Device. Journal of Accounting Research, 54, 113-146.

[4]   Du R. R., Xiao Z. Z., & Zhou, Q. W. (2009). A Review of Chinese Management Accounting Research. Accounting Research, 9, 74-80.

[5]   He, L. L., Zhu, F. M., & Chen, Z. W. (2014). Corporate Environmental Responsibility Definition and Evaluation: The Perspective of Environmental Resource Allocation. Management World, 3, 180-181.

[6]   Hesford, J. W., Lee, S. H., Van der Stede, W. A., et al. (2006). Management Accounting: A Bibliographic Study. Handbook of Management Accounting Research, 1, 3-26.

[7]   Hu, Y. M. (2011). The Research Framework for Accounting Theory and Methodology in Enterprise Management: Basic Conception and Expected Breakthrough. Communication of Finance and Accounting, 4, 6-10.

[8]   Hu, Y. M. (2017). Research on China’s Management Accounting Research: Return to Nature and Common Sense. Financial Research, 3, 14-21.

[9]   Ji, L., & Su, M. (2016). Internalization of Enterprise Environmental Cost Drivers: Compliance or Benefits?—Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Heavily Polluting Industries. Accounting Research, 11, 69-75.

[10]   Liu, Y. G., & Chen, G. F. (2007). Enterprise Performance Evaluation Study Combining BSC and EVA—Case Analysis Based on GP Enterprise Group. Accounting Research, 9, 50-59.

[11]   Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2009). Psychology Models of Management Accounting. Foundations and Trends in Accounting, 4, 199-345.

[12]   Meng, Y., Sun, J., Lu, C., et al. (2014). Review and Outlook of China’s Management Accounting Research. Accounting Research, 9, 3-12.

[13]   Schloetzer, J. D. (2012). Process Integration and Information Sharing in Supply Chains. The Accounting Review, 87, 1005-1032.

[14]   Shields, M. D. (1997). Research in Management Accounting by North Americans in the 1990s. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 3-61.

[15]   Shields, M. D. (2015). Established Management Accounting Knowledge. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27, 123-132.

[16]   Sprinkle, G. B., Williamson, M. G., & Upton, D. R. (2008). The Effort and Risk-Taking Effects of Budget-Based Contracts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 436-452.

[17]   The Ministry of Finance (2014). Planning the Grand Blueprint to Make History—“The Ministry of Finance on the Overall Promotion of the Management Accounting System Construction Guidance”. Series of Interpretation of One of the Series of Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2, 6-10.

[18]   Wang, Y. (2013).Application of Experimental Research Methods in Overseas Management Accounting Research—Based on Analysis of Data from 73 Sample Literatures. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 4, 69-77.

[19]   Wu, X. (2012). Methodology of Accounting Research (pp. 48-68). Beijing: Chinese Min University Press.

[20]   Yang, Y. L., Pan, F., & Zhang, C. (2014). Performance Evaluation of Chinese Enterprises from the Perspective of Differential Order Pattern. Accounting Research, 10, 66-73.

[21]   Zhang, C., Yang, Y. L., & Gao, M. (2012). The Practical Problems and Research Challenges of Non-Financial Performance Appraisal of Chinese Enterprises—Based on Literature Research. Accounting Research, 12, 55-60.

[22]   Zhang, X. J., Xu, J., & Xu, L. B. (2015). Can Executive Elite Governance Model Improve Corporate Performance?—Based on the Regulating Effect of Social Solidarity. Economic Research, 3, 100-114.

[23]   Zheng, G. J., Lin, D. J., & Tan, W. Q. (2016). Clan Control, Group Internal Structure and Performance of Listed Companies. Accounting Research, 2, 36-43.

[24]   Zhou, L., Pan, F., Liu, Y.J., & Ma, B. Z. (2012). Field Research on Management Accounting Changes and Innovation. Accounting Studies, 3, 85-93.