JHRSS  Vol.8 No.1 , March 2020
The Five Essential Reasons for the Failure of School Reforms
Abstract: We unearth and examine the most critical reasons for the failure of school reforms in the United States over the last century. More especially, we look beyond and below traditional explanations provided by the ministries of school reform since the ESEA in 1965. We call into question the most ascendant and most universal beliefs about improvement that are in play at given periods of school reform (e.g., “scientific evidence” currently). We also observe that when knowledge transforms into understanding, it still lacks the power to explain the failure of school reform efforts.
Cite this paper: Murphy, J. (2020) The Five Essential Reasons for the Failure of School Reforms. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 8, 1-17. doi: 10.4236/jhrss.2020.81001.

[1]   Aladjem, D. K., Birman, B. F., Orland, M., Harr-Robins, J., Heredia, A., Parrish, T. B., & Ruffini, S. J. (2010). Achieving Dramatic School Improvement: An Exploratory Study. A Cross-Site Analysis from the Evaluation of Comprehensive School Reform Program Implementation and Outcomes Study. Washington DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, US Department of Education.

[2]   Ancess, J. (2000). The Reciprocal Influence of Teacher Learning, Teaching Practice, School Restructuring, and Student Learning Outcomes. The Teachers College Record, 102, 590-619.

[3]   Antrop-González, R. (2006). Toward the “School as Sanctuary” Concept in Multicultural Urban Education: Implications for Small High School Reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 273-301.

[4]   Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student Engagement with School: Critical Conceptual and Methodological Issues of the Construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369-386.

[5]   Asen, R., Gurke, D., Conners, P., Solomon, R., & Gumm, E. (2013). Lessons from Research Evidence and School Based Deliberations: Three Wisconsin School Districts. Educational Policy, 27, 33-63.

[6]   Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a Difference: Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy and Student Achievement. New York: Longman.

[7]   Barnes, C. A., Goertz, M. E., & Massell, D. (2014). How State Education Agencies Acquire and Use Research Knowledge for School Improvement. In Using Research Evidence in Education (pp. 99-116). New York: Springer.

[8]   Beishuizen, J. J., Hof, E., Van Putten, C. M., Bouwmeeter, S., & Asscher, J. J. (2010). Students’ and Teachers’ Cognitions about Good Teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 185-201.

[9]   Bell, S., & Pirtle, S. S. (2012). Transforming Low-Performing Rural Schools. Texas Comprehensive Center Briefing Paper, Austin, TX: Texas Comprehensive Center.

[10]   Biesta, G. (2007). Why “What Works” Won’t Work: Evidence-Based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Education Research. Educational Theory, 57, 1-22.

[11]   Blanton, A. W. (1920). Democracy in School Administration. High School Quarterly, 8, 155-159.

[12]   Borman, G. D., Rachuba, L., Datnow, A., Alberg, M., MacIver, M., Stringfield, S., & Ross, S. (2000). Four Models of School Improvement: Successes and Challenges in Reforming Low-Performing, High-Poverty Title I Schools. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, Johns Hopkins University.

[13]   Boser, U., & McDaniels, A. (2018). Addressing the Gap between Education Research and Practice: The Need for State Education Capacity Centers. Washington DC: Center for American Progress.

[14]   Brady, R. C. (2003). Can Failing Schools Be Fixed? Washington DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.

[15]   Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. (2010). Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

[16]   Burch, P. (2007). Educational Policy and Practices from the Perspective of Institutional Theory: Crafting a Wider Lens. Educational Researcher, 36, 84-95.

[17]   Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the Cult of Efficiency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

[18]   Carroll, J. (1963). A Model for School Learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.

[19]   Coburn, C. E., Honig, M. I., & Stein, M. K. (2009). What’s the Evidence on Districts’ Use of Evidence? In J. Bradford, D. Stipek, L. Gomez, D. Lam, & N. Vye (Eds.), The Role of Research in Educational Improvement (pp. 67-87). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.

[20]   Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. E. (2013). Practice Partnerships: A Strategy for Leveraging Research for Educational Improvement in School Districts. New York: William T. Grant Foundation.

[21]   Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Teacher Research and Research on Teaching: The Issues That Divide. Educational Researcher, 19, 2-11.

[22]   Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2006). Troubling Images of Teaching in No Child Left Behind. Harvard Education Review, 76, 668-697.

[23]   Cohen, D. K., Peurach, D. J., Glazer, J. L., Gates, K. E., & Goldin, S. (2014). Improvement by Design: The Promise of Better Schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

[24]   Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing Students’ Perspectives: Toward Trust, Dialogue, and Change in Education. Educational Researcher, 31, 36-59.

[25]   Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, Presence, and Power: “Student Voice” in Educational Research and Reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 359-390.

[26]   Cooper, M. (1988). School as a Place to Have a Career. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Whose Culture Is It, Anyway? (pp. 45-54). New York: Teachers College Press.

[27]   Cremin, L. A. (1955). The Revolution in American Secondary Education, 1893-1918. Teachers College Record, 56, 295-308.

[28]   Cremin, L. A. (1961). The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education 1876-1957. New York: Vintage.

[29]   Creswell, J. R. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[30]   Crosnoe, R. (2011). Fitting In, Standing Out: Navigating the Social Challenges of High School to Get an Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[31]   Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming Again, Again, and Again. Educational Researcher, 19, 3-13.

[32]   Cuban, L. (1993). How Teachers Taught: Constancy and Change in American Classrooms, 1890-1990. New York: Teachers College Press.

[33]   Cuban, L. (2010). Evidence, Beliefs, and a Science of Education.

[34]   Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the Black Box of Classroom Practice: Change without Reform in American Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

[35]   Cuban, L., & Usdan, M. (2003). Learning from the Past. In L. Cuban, & M. Usdan (Eds.), Powerful Reforms with Shallow Roots (pp. 1-15). New York: Teachers College Press.

[36]   Cusick, P. (1973). Inside High School. The Student’s World. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

[37]   Cusick, P. (1983). The Egalitarian Ideal and the American High School: Studies of Three Schools. New York: Longman.

[38]   Diamond, J. (2012). Accountability Policy, School Organization, and Classroom Practice: Partial Recoupling and Educational Opportunity. Education and Urban Sociology, 44, 151-182.

[39]   Dynarski, M. (2015). Using Research to Improve Education under the Every Student Succeeds Act. Evidence Speaks Reports, Vol. 1, No. 8, Brookings: Center on Children and Families.

[40]   Ellis, A. K., & Fouts, J. T. (1993). Research on Educational Innovations. Princeton Junction, NJ: Eye on Education.

[41]   Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The Qualitative Content Analysis Process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107-115.

[42]   Evans, R. (1996). The Human Side of School Change: Reform, Resistance, and Real-Life Problems of Innovation. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

[43]   Flutter, J., & Rudduck, J. (2004). Consulting Pupils: What’s in It for Schools? London: Routledge.

[44]   Fornes, S. L., Rocco, T. S., & Wollard, K. K. (2008). Workplace Commitment: A Conceptual Model Developed from Integrative Review of the Research. Human Resource Development Review, 7, 339-357.

[45]   Fullan, M. (1982). The Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.

[46]   Fullan, M. (1993). Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. London: Falmer.

[47]   Fullan, M. (2010). All Systems Go: The Change Imperative for Whole System Reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

[48]   Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the Framework Method for the Analysis of Qualitative Data in Multi-Disciplinary Health Research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 117.

[49]   Giere, R. (2006). Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

[50]   Hampel, R. L. (1986). The Last Little Citadel: American High Schools since 1940. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

[51]   Herman, R. (2012). Scaling School Turnaround. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 17, 25-33.

[52]   Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2004). Children’s Geographies and the New Social Studies of Childhood. In S. L. Holloway, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s Geographies: Playing, Living, Learning (pp. 1-26). London: Routledge.

[53]   Honig, M. I., & Coburn, C. (2008). Evidence-Based Decision Making in School District Central Offices toward a Policy and Research Agenda. Educational Policy, 22, 578-608.

[54]   Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-1288.

[55]   Kirshner, B., & Jefferson, A. (2015). Participatory Democracy and Struggling Schools: Making Space for Youth in School Turnarounds. Teachers College Record, 117, Article ID: 060303.

[56]   Knudson, J., Shambaugh, L., & O’Day, J. (2011). Beyond the School: Exploring a Systemic Approach to School Turnaround Policy and Practice Brief. San Mateo, CA: California Collaborative on District Reform.

[57]   Kowal, J. M., & Hassel, E. A. (2005). Turnarounds with New Leaders and Staff. Washington DC: The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.

[58]   Koyama, J. (2015). When Things Come Undone: The Promise of Dissembling Education Policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36, 548-559.

[59]   Lambert, L., Passmore, H. A., & Joshanloo, M. (2018). A Positive Psychology Intervention Program in a Culturally-Diverse University: Boosting Happiness and Reducing Fear. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 1141-1162.

[60]   Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-of-School-Time Programs: A Meta-Analysis of Effects for At-Risk Students. Review of Educational Research, 76, 275-313.

[61]   Levin, B. (2000). Putting Students at the Centre in Education Reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1, 155-172.

[62]   Lieberman, A., Saxl, E. R., & Miles, M. B. (1988). Teacher Leadership: Ideology and Practice. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a Professional Culture in Schools (pp. 148-166). New York: Teachers College Press.

[63]   Little, J. W. (1987). Teachers as Colleagues. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educators’ Handbook: A Research Perspective (pp. 491-518). White Plains, NY: Longman.

[64]   Livingston, C. (1992). Teachers as Leaders: Evolving Roles. West Haven, CT: NEA Professional Library.

[65]   Lubienski, C., Scott, J., & DeBray, E. (2014). The Politics of Research Production, Promotion, and Utilization in Educational Policy. Educational Policy, 28, 131-144.

[66]   Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming School Cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

[67]   McDonnell, L. M., & Weatherford, M. S. (2013). Evidence Use and the Common Core State Standards Movement: From Problem Definition to Policy Adoption. American Journal of Education, 120, 1-25.

[68]   McLaughlin, M. W. (1990). The Rand Change Agent Study: Macro Perspectives and Micro Realities. Educational Researcher, 19, 11-16.

[69]   Mergendoller, J. R., & Packer, M. J. (1985). Seventh Graders’ Conceptions of Teachers: An Interpretive Analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 84, 581-600.

[70]   Meyers, C. V., & Hitt, D. H. (2017). School Turnaround Principals: What Does Initial Research Literature Suggest They Are Doing to Be Successful? Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 22, 38-56.

[71]   Mintrop, H., & Sunderman, G. L. (2009). Predictable Failure of Federal Sanctions-Driven Accountability for School Improvement—And Why We May Retain It Anyway. Educational Researcher, 38, 353-364.

[72]   Mintrop, H., MacLellan, A. M., & Quintero, M. F. (2001). School Improvement Plans in Schools on Probation: A Comparative Content Analysis across Three Accountability Systems. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 197-218.

[73]   Murphy, J., Weil, M., Hallinger, P., & Mitman, A. (1982). Academic Press: Translating High Expectations into School Polices and Classroom Practices. Educational Leadership, 40, 22-26.

[74]   Murphy, J., & Torre, D. (2014). Creating Productive Cultures in Schools: For Students, Teachers, and Parents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

[75]   Murphy, J. (2016). Understanding Schooling through the Eyes of Students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

[76]   Murphy, J., & Bleiberg, J. F. (2019). School Turnaround Policies and Practices in the US: Learning from Failed School Reform. Berlin: Springer.

[77]   Neal, J. W., Neal, Z. P., Kornbluh, M., Mills, K. J., & Lawlor, J. A. (2015). Brokering the Research Practice Gap: A Typology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56, 422-435.

[78]   Nunnery, J. A. (1998). Reform Ideology and the Locus of Development Problem in Education Restructuring. Education and Urban Society, 30, 277-295.

[79]   Peck, C., & Reitzug, U. C. (2014). School Turnaround Fever: The Paradoxes of a Historical Practice Promoted as a New Reform. Urban Education, 49, 8-38.

[80]   Player, D., & Katz, V. (2016). Assessing School Turnaround: Evidence from Ohio. The Elementary School Journal, 116, 675-698.

[81]   Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESCR Methods Programme Version, 1, b92.

[82]   Putt, A., & Springer, J. (1989). Policy Research: Concepts, Methods, and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[83]   Reynolds, D., Harris, A., Clarke, P., Harris, B., & James, S. (2006). Challenging the Challenged: Developing an Improvement Programme for Schools Facing Exceptionally Challenging Circumstances. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 425-439.

[84]   Rist, R. C. (1973). The Urban School: A Factory for Failure. A Study of Education in American Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[85]   Rodgers, M., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Roberts, H., Britten, N., & Popay, J. (2009). Testing Methodological Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Smoke Alarm Ownership and Function. Evaluation, 15, 49-73.

[86]   Rosenberg, L., Christianson, M. D., & Angus, M. H. (2015). Improvement Efforts in Rural Schools: Experiences of Nine Schools Receiving School Improvement Grants. Peabody Journal of Education, 90, 194-210.

[87]   Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers’ Workplace: The Social Organization of Schools. White Plains, NY: Longman.

[88]   Saksvik, P. O., Nytro, K., Dahl-Jorgensen, C., & Mikkelsen, A. (2002). A Process Evaluation of Individual and Organizational Occupational Stress and Health Interventions. Work & Stress, 16, 37-57.

[89]   Sarason, S. B. (1982). The Culture of School and the Problem of Change (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

[90]   Sarason, S. B. (1990). The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform: Can We Change Course before It’s Too Late? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[91]   (1918) School Administration and Teachers. School and Society, 8, 740-741.

[92]   Silberman, C. E. (1970). Crisis in the Classroom: The Remaking of American Education. New York: Vintage Books.

[93]   Sizer, T. R. (1984). Horace’s Compromise: The Dilemma of the American High School. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

[94]   Smarick, A. (2010). The Turnaround Fallacy. Education Next, 10, 20-26.

[95]   Smylie, M. A. (1995). New Perspectives on Teacher Leadership. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 3-7.

[96]   Tyack, D. B. (1974). The One Best System: A History of America Urban Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[97]   Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The Gap between Educational Research and Practice: Views of Teachers, School Leaders, Intermediaries and Researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 299-316.

[98]   Wise, A. E. (1979). Legislated Learning: The Bureaucratization of the American Classroom. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[99]   Wolcott, H. F. (1997). Teachers versus Technocrats: An Educational Innovation in Anthropological Perspective. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, Center for Educational Policy and Management.

[100]   Zavadsky, H. (2013). Scaling Turnaround: A District-Improvement Approach. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

[101]   Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2017). Qualitative Analysis of Content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Applications to Question in Information and Library Science (2nd ed., pp. 318-329). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.