JFRM  Vol.8 No.4 , December 2019
Risk and Rationality
Abstract: Since time immemorial, people have made decisions, both big and small based on biased perceptions and faulty cognitive processes. Such perceptions and biases bore a positive correlation to the rate of survival of the individual for a large part of human history. This type of survival strategy owes its roots to the most primal coding in the human brain. While biases may have been a way of life in the past, the increasing complexity of human interactions has resulted in these biases that helped the survival of humans to cause more negative outcomes. Though history is replete with examples of healthcare and economic disasters due to such heuristics, individuals and theorists are often reluctant to make changes in their thinking and theories. This paper explores the biases that plague the risk management sector of the global economy. It primarily deals with four core biases that form the pillars that support the entire mental network of cognitive biases and seeks to identify proactive methods that advisors and investors can use in order to maximise their returns by neutralising the effect of these biases.
Cite this paper: Shankar, S. (2019) Risk and Rationality. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 8, 305-314. doi: 10.4236/jfrm.2019.84021.

[1]   Allen, M., & Coole, H. (2012). Experimenter Confirmation Bias and the Correction of Science Misconceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 387-405.

[2]   Barberis, N., & Xiong, W. (2006). What Drives the Disposition Effect? An Analysis of a Long-Standing Preference-Based Explanation. The National Bureau of Economic Research.

[3]   Basiago, A. D. (1999). Economic, Social, and Environmental Sustainability in Development Theory and Urban Planning Practice. The Environmentalist, 19, 145-161.

[4]   Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Encyclopedia of Social Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

[5]   BBC (2015). Why We Gamble Like Monkeys.

[6]   Blume, L. E., & Easley, D. (2007). Rationality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

[7]   Brennan, T. J., & Lo, A. W. (2011). The Origin of Behavior. Quarterly Journal of Finance, 1, 55-108.

[8]   Colander, D. (1995). Marshallian General Equilibrium Analysis. Eastern Economic Journal, 21, 281.

[9]   Colman, A. M. (2009). A Dictionary of Psychology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[10]   Doukas, J. A., & Petmezas, D. (2007). Acquisitions, Overconfident Managers and Self- Attribution Bias. European Financial Management Journal, 13, 531-577.

[11]   Economic-Times (2017). What Is a Risk Profiler.

[12]   Esgate, A., & Groome, D. (2005). An Introduction to Applied Cognitive Psychology. London: Psychology Press.

[13]   Fine, B., & Leopold, E. (1990). Consumerism and the Industrial Revolution. Social History, 15, 151-179.

[14]   Fisher, I. (1928). The Money Illusion. New York: Adelphi Company.

[15]   Gilovich, T., & Savitsky, K. (1996). Like Goes with Like: The Role of Representativeness in Erroneous and Pseudo-Scientific Beliefs. Skeptical Inquirer, 20, 34.

[16]   Glenberg, A. M. et al. (1980). A Two-Process Account of Long-Term Serial Position Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 355-369.

[17]   Haselton, M. G. (2009). Adaptive Rationality: An Evolutionary Perspective on Cognitive Bias. Social Cognition, 27, 733-763.

[18]   Herstein, I. N., & Milnor, J. (1953). An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility. Econometrica, 21, 291-297.

[19]   Jonathan, B., & Ilana, R. (1994). Reference Points and Omission Bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 475-498.

[20]   Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.

[21]   Kreps, D. M. (1988). Notes on Theory of Choice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

[22]   Li, M., & Chapman, B. G. (2009). 100% of Everything Looks Good: The Appeal of One Hundred Percent. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 16, 156-162.

[23]   Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92, 805-824.

[24]   Machulup, F. (1946). Marginal Analysis and Empirical Research. American Economic Review, 36, 519.

[25]   Manis, M., Jonides, J., Shelder, J., & Nelson, T. (1993). Availability Heuristic in Judgments of Set Size and Frequency of Occurrence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 448-457.

[26]   Marschak, J. (1950). Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility. Econometrica, 18, 111-141.

[27]   Neumann, J. V., & Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (3rd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[28]   Pallier, G. et al. (2002). The Role of Individual Differences in the Accuracy of Confidence Judgments. The Journal of General Psychology, 129, 257-299.

[29]   Plous, S. (1993). The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. New York: McGraw Hill.

[30]   Richter, M. K. (1966). Invariance Axioms and Economic Indexes. Econometrica, 34, 739-755.

[31]   Robson, A. J. (1996). A Biological Basis for Expected and Non-Expected Utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 68, 397-424.

[32]   Roeckelein, J. E. (2006). Elsevier’s Dictionary of Psychological Theories. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

[33]   Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Finance, 40, 777-790.

[34]   Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211, 453-458.

[35]   Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1984). Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.

[36]   Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. The Journal of Business, 59, S251-S278.

[37]   Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.

[38]   Tversky, A., & Kahnenam, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.

[39]   Zak, P. J. (2008). Moral Markets: The Critical Role of Values in the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.