JAMP  Vol.7 No.12 , December 2019
Loschmidt’s Paradox, Extended to CPT Symmetry, Bypasses Second Law
Abstract: Loschmidt’s paradox is extended by replacing its assumption of time reversibility with full CPT symmetry. Mobility is identified as a means for expressing collisions or dissipation, and the cross product of its gradient with the magnetic field, for expressing parity. Three phenomena incorporating such cross products are identified. The first is the cross product of the mobility gradient with the magnetic field. The second combines this cross product with the E cross B drift. The third is the reciprocal of the Nernst effect expressed as a cross product of the temperature gradient and the magnetic field. Simulations are conducted for testing Loschmidt’s extended paradox. Onsager’s exclusion of magnetic fields and rotation from reciprocals violates CPT symmetry and is unjustified. All three cross-product phenomena skew statistics in a fashion unanticipated by Boltzmann’s assumptions in his H-Theorem. CPT symmetric systems fall outside the assumptions of the theorem which is not rendered invalid but simply limited to its domain of applicability. Therefore, these systems do not violate the second law as Boltzmann defines it. They bypass it.
Cite this paper: Levy, G. (2019) Loschmidt’s Paradox, Extended to CPT Symmetry, Bypasses Second Law. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 7, 3140-3175. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2019.712221.

[1]   Albert Einstein, Wikiquote.

[2]   Boltzmann, L. (1872) Weitere Studien über das Wärmegleichgewicht unter Gasmolekülen. Sitzungsberichte Akademie der Wissenschaften, 66, 275-370. [English Translation: Boltzmann, L. (2003) Further Studies on the Thermal Equilibrium of Gas Molecules, The Kinetic Theory of Gases. History of Modern Physical Sciences, 1, 262-349.]

[3]   Loschmidt’s Time Reversibility Paradox, Wikipedia.’s_paradox

[4]   Andreas, T. (1999) Energy, Entropy: On the Occasion of the 100th Anniversary of Loschmidt’s Death in 1895: Is Loschmidt’s Greatest Discovery Waiting for Its Discovery? Physics Essays, 12, 614-628.

[5]   Arrow of Time, Wikipedia.

[6]   Gibbs Paradox, Wikipedia.

[7]   Gibbs, J.W. (2019) On the Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Substances.

[8]   Tolman, R.C. (1938) The Principle of Statistical Mechanics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

[9]   Von Neumann, J. (1929) Proof of the Ergodic Theorem and the H-Theorem in Quantum Mechanics. arXiv:1003.2133v2.

[10]   Von Neumann, J. (1955) Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

[11]   Evans, D.J., Cohen, E.G.D. and Morriss, G.P. (1993) Probability of Second Law Violation in Shearing Steady States. Physical Review Letters, 71, 2401-2404.

[12]   Evans. D.J. and Searles, D.J. (1996) Causality, Response Theory, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Physical Review E, 53, 5808.

[13]   Evans D.J. and Searles, D.J. (2002) The Fluctuation Theorem. Advances in Physics, 51, 1529-1585.

[14]   Klimenko, A.Y. (2017) Kinetics of Interactions of Matter, Antimatter and Radiation Consistent with Antisymmetric (CPT-Invariant) Thermodynamics. Entropy, 19, 202.

[15]   Klimenko, A.Y. (2016) Symmetric and Antisymmetric Forms of the Pauli Master Equation. Scientific Reports, 6, 29942.

[16]   Klimenko, A.Y. and Maas, U. (2014) One Antimatter—Two Possible Thermodynamics. Entropy, 16, 1191-1210.

[17]   Onsager, L. (1931) Reciprocal Relationships in Irreversible Processes. I. Physical Review Journals Archive, 37, 407-425.

[18]   Onsager, L. (1931) Reciprocal Relationships in Irreversible Processes. II. Physical Review Journals Archive, 38, 2265.

[19]   Note: The mobility gradient effect may be familiar to anyone who has driven in winter on a slippery road, lightly covered with snow in the center (because of traffic), and more heavily, near the shoulder. Driving slightly off center, say to the right, increases drag on the right wheels, producing a torque that makes the car veer right, thereby producing more drag on the right wheels. A force is generated perpendicularly to the direction of motion and along the mobility gradient, causing the car to drift quickly and uncontrollably off the icy road and into the snowbank. In this case, there is no magnetic field and the resulting motion occurs along this force.

[20]   Levy, G.S. (2017) The Reciprocal Hall Effect, CPT Symmetry and the Second Law. Open Science, 4, 1-8.

[21]   Levy, G.S. (2017) Choosing between the Reciprocal Hall Effect, CPT symmetry and the Second Law. The Open Science Journal of Modern Physics, 4, 1-8.

[22]   Crooks, G.E. (1999) The Entropy Production Fluctuation Theorem and the Nonequilibrium Work Relation for Free Energy Differences. Physical Review E, 60, 2721.

[23]   Duncan, T.L. (2000) Comment on “Dynamically Maintained Steady-State Pressure Gradients”. Physical Review E, 61, 4661.

[24]   Thermodynamic Limit, Wikipedia.

[25]   Sheehan, D.P. and Gross, D.H.E. (2006) Extensivity and the Thermodynamic Limit: Why Size Really Does Matter. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 370, 461-482.

[26]   Indium Antimonide, Wikipedia.

[27]   Guiding Center, Wikipedia.

[28]   Fu, X. and Fu, Z. (20106) Realization of Maxwell’s Hypothesis: A Heat-Electric Conversion in Contradiction to the Kelvin Statement.

[29]   Motley, R.W. (1975) Q-Machines. Academic Press, New York.

[30]   Rynn, N. and D’Angelo, N. (1960) Device for Generating a Low Temperature, Highly Ionized Cesium Plasma. Review of Scientific Instruments, 31, 1326.

[31]   Fick’s Law of Diffusion, Wikipedia.

[32]   Nernst Effect, Wikipedia.

[33]   Kollasch, J. (2014) Private Communication.

[34]   Note: The author acknowledges that in previous publications [43] [44] [45] [46] he relied on the skewing of distributions by quantum statistics and takes this opportunity to correct the record. The quantum statistical examples he used in these papers do not skew the distribution of thermal carriers (unfrozen microstates). However, the CPT symmetrical systems discussed in this paper do. All previously published results relying on statistical skewing still stand when applied to CPT symmetric systems. Asymmetrical statistics can bypass the second law, temperature gradients can form spontaneously. Heat flow in the presence of a magnetic field can have circulation implying that temperature and entropy may not be scalar.

[35]   Čápek, V. and Sheehan, D. (2005) Challenges to the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Springer, New York.

[36]   Uffink, J. (2006) Compendium of the Foundations of Classical Statistical Physics. 44-45.

[37]   Brown, H. and Myrvold, W. (2008) PhilSci-Archive.

[38]   Crooks, G.E. (1999) The Entropy Production Fluctuation Theorem and the Nonequilibrium Work Relation for Free Energy Differences. Physical Review E, 60, 2721.

[39]   Mazur, P. and Degroot, S.R. (1953) On Onsager’s Relations in a Magnetic Field. Physica, 19, 961-970.

[40]   Trigonometric Integrals, Wikipedia.

[41]   Entropic Force, Wikipedia.

[42]   Drude Model, Wikipedia.

[43]   Levy, G.S. (2018) Using Quantum Statistics to Win at Thermodynamics, and Cheating in Vegas. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 6, 2166-2179.

[44]   Levy, G.S. (2018) Temperature and Voltage Offsets in High ZT Thermoelectrics. Journal of Electronic Materials, 47, 3067-3076.

[45]   Levy, G.S. (2015) Quantum Game Beats Classical Odds-Thermodynamics Implications. Entropy, 17, 7645-7657.

[46]   Levy, G.S. (2016) Anomalous Temperature Gradient in Non-Maxwellian Gases. In: Ceramics for Energy Conversion, Storage, and Distribution Systems: Ceramic Transactions, Volume 255, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.