Schein  contends that “the fundamental assumptions underlying any change in a human system are derived originally from Kurt Lewin in 1947” (p. 299) whose process has three steps:
“Unfreezing the organization from its current state; implementing the desired change; and refreezing the organization in a new desired sate” . The benefits of the aforementioned steps are to drive the change in a systematic way, plan for the change, and mitigate the impact of change on the organization. Though, one well known problem to the change process is employees’ resistance which negatively affects the whole process of change and if not dealt with adequately leads to undesired results. Consequently, and according to Jones , organizations try to mitigate the negative impact of change using several organizational development (OD) techniques including “education and communication, participation and empowerment, facilitation and support, bargaining and negotiation, and coercion”, also other OD techniques are used in order to promote change like counseling, training, and team building, … Furthermore, Cummings and Worley  assert that organizational development intervention is manifested in specific actions namely, “1) Human Process Issues including communication, problem solving, decision making, interacting and leading; and 2) Human Process Interventions including interpersonal, group process, and organization process approaches” (p. 155).
Leading the change process toward mitigating threats relies on the human capital, as stressed by Hussain, Lei, Akram, Haider, Hussain and Ali  who posit that “the dominant role of leadership and employee involvement in change process are necessary for bringing effective change in management” (p. 126). Further, Oreg  and Furst & Cable  assert that employees’ active roles in organizational change tend them toward acceptance of the change process and positive feelings, respectively.
This study aims to shed light and assess the role of the HR in the change process from a small willing sample of Lebanese HR experts’ and professionals’ points of view. Thus, the objectives of this study are as follows:
· Identify the process of change.
· Shed light on the role of HR (Functional area, managers, and employees) in the ongoing process of change in organizations.
· Assess the intertwining relation between the change process and the HR role in this process.
This paper is organized as follows: In section 2, a review of the literature is presented. Section 3 describes the research methodology including approach, sampling and interview design. The following Section 4 presents the results and discussion, and then Section 5 presents a closure to the paper with conclusions, recommendations and implications.
2. Literature Review
Gartner  provides important facts about change in organizations, whereby “73% of the organizations expect more change initiatives in the next few years, and only a small minority expects the pace of change to decelerate. Unfortunately, many organizations fail to implement change effectively. In fact, only a third of change efforts are clear successes, 16% show mixed results, and half are clear failures” (Para 1). Therefore, organizational change embodies strategic moves. Cummings and Worley  argue that “business strategies and organizational systems must be changed together in response to external and internal disruptions. A strategic change plan helps members manage the transition between a current strategy and organization design and the desired future strategic orientation” (p. 160). Jones  defines it as “the process by which organizations move from their present state to some desired future state to increase their effectiveness”. Therefore, planned organizational change needs adequate management of the change process accompanied by employees’ awareness of the change to stimulate the process . Further, Cook & Macaulay  (p. 1), define change management as the daily bread of organizations, where technological advancement, extensive rate of competition, globalization, and many other factors govern the way organizations operate and change. Moreover, Lockwood  notes that the Society for Human Resource Management defines change management as “a formal process for organizational change that includes a systematic approach and application of knowledge” (p. 31). Furthermore, Lockwood adds that change management “means defining and adopting corporate strategies, structures, procedures, and technologies to deal with change stemming from internal and external conditions” .
A change process necessitates that leaders not only engage organizational staff in critical decision making, but also in the implementation of change. Collarbone  contends that “Leaders need to build authority within individuals, This frees everyone to work at full potential, creating increased efficiency, motivation and effectiveness and increase leadership capacity and capability at all levels” (p. 3). The aforementioned is congruent with Mathieu, Gilson and Rubby  who stress that empowering employees with authority and responsibility leads to their effective involvement.
According to the Society for Human Resource Management, SHRM , “Business managers who want to undertake major transformation to stay competitive must work with HR staff to gain employee acceptance and support” (Para 13). HR practitioners are aware of the aforementioned requirements for the success of change, actually HR staff are a major part of it and they play an active role in the change process and its outcomes. “HR can play a dual role in change management by initiating and leading the change and by serving as a facilitator for changes that other leaders and departments initiated”  (Para 18).
2.1. Change as a Process
Three models are reviewed in this paper. Kurt Lewin  researched group decision-making, implementation and social change leading to his planned organizational change approach. Lewin’s model consists of three steps based on intentional change in the organization and posits that change initiators may opt to use different strategies to implement the change intended. The three steps are as follows: 1) unfreezing the status quo considered the equilibrium state, whereby it is necessary to overcome the challenges of individual resistance and group conformity; 2) the movement, that is, to move the target system to a new level of equilibrium; 3) refreezing, occurring after the implementation of change to achieve sustainability .
The second model for change is Kotter’s model introduced in 1995. This model is considered more as a sequence of actions, or a checklist, that organizations can adopt for implementing the process of change, but according to Burnes , the aforementioned steps represented a process not a checklist. The eight steps model as Kotter  suggested are: “Creating sense of urgency; forming a powerful coalition; create a vision for change; communicating the vision; getting rid of obstacles; creating short-term wins; building on change; and institutionalizing new approaches” (p. 61).
Anderson and Anderson  are credited for the third model of planned change which views change based on three perspectives namely content, people and process and is divided into nine cyclical phases. Further, the model provides a thorough coverage of the whole change process and explains it as a cyclical process. It consists of four critical factors: “charismatic leadership, organizational crisis, understanding across the organization of the urgency of the situation, and a trusting relationship between the leader and the organization members” (p. 151).
2.2. Triggers of Change
Researchers tend to discuss the external factors of change more widely, where they affect organizations the most, and according to McMillan , most organizations are faced with external forces like globalization and modern technology which add uncertainties to be dealt with. Oakland & Tanner  suggested two types of factors of change, the external change drives (competition, customer requirements; demand from other stakeholders; government; and regulatory demands) and the internal change drives of the organization (improvement targets applied to quality of goods, products and services; to operational efficiency; and to the process). The aforementioned is affirmed by Ryerson University , “change stemming from internal and external conditions” (p. 4).
2.3. Levels of Change
Cameron & Green  contend that change occurs in organizations on three main levels namely, individual, team and organizational levels.
Ryerson University  posits that employees are the main entity affected by the change. “It is critical that they are involved in the process and understand how the change initiative will impact their current state” (p. 8). Therefore, individuals in any organization constitute a critical level whereby the idea of change needs to be addressed. Cameron & Green  describe four theories in their book to explain this level namely, “Behavioral approach; Cognitive approach; Psychodynamic approach, and Humanistic Psychological approach” (pp. 12-13).
Organizations consist of different types of working groups who are involved in the change.
According to Collarbone  “Change teams have a profound effect on organizational culture. For example, staff feel more included and involved in the running of the organization and feel more of a sense of ownership (both of the change process itself and of the changes that are made). People support what they help to create” (p. 76). Further, Todnem, Kuipers and Procter  assert that “teams are important objects of change, are meaningful units to contribute to various types of change” (p. 7).
According to Mar , “Organizational Change Management is the practice of managing enterprise changes such as mergers & acquisitions, restructuring, process changes and culture transitions. It's often focused on the people side of change—socializing change to reduce resistance and gain acceptance. In many cases, organizational change management is an executive management function or is a program run by the human resources department” (Para 5-6).
2.4. Resistance to Change
Paycor Incorporation , believes that “People prefer stability and comfort over change in both their personal and professional lives. Over the past few years, change has become a norm in the business world. Companies that can manage change with ease will have the upper hand over their competition” (Para 3). Further, Yılmaz & Kılıçoğlu  assert that “resistance to change is any attitude or behavior indicating no willingness to support or make a desired change. In fact, resistance to change is a resistance to loss of something that is valuable or loss of the known by moving to the unknown” (p. 16).
Expert Program Management  posit that people resist change in four common ways namely, “  when they feel that they, personally, will lose something of value,  when they misunderstand the implications of the change,  when they assess the situation differently from those initiating the change, and  when they have been working the same way successfully for years)” (Para 8, 10, 12, 15). Similarly, Paycor  identified 5 causes for resistance to change confirming the aforementioned ways namely, Job loss; poor communication and engagement; lack of trust; future is unknown; and poor timing.
Researchers classify resistance to change based on three sources of the organization, “organizational, group, and individual sources”  (p. 646), as well as along three entities which may cause damage to the intended change in any organization namely, employee resistance, executive resistance and customer resistance  (Para 3-5).
2.5. Human Resource Roles in Change
Griffin  contends that “the success or failure of an organization depends largely on the competence of its people” (p. 7). Also, Benedict  asserts that “change management leaders must promote awareness and understanding of the change initiative to influence employees’ willingness to embrace the change. HR is the obvious candidate for the role of leading the people side of change” (p. vii). Adeniji, Osibanjo and Abiodun  contend that the concept of HR management “includes employees identifying the interests and goals of the organization, and be aligned and committed in achieving these goals. It involves employees adapting willingly to change within the organizational structure without any strife or prejudice” (p. 144). Confirmed by Macky and Boxall  who stressed that HRM practices influence employee attitudes and behavior. Further, Tummers, Kruyen, Vijverberg and Voesenek  assert that the HR function has to act on the proactivity of the employees. Also, “proactive behavior is change oriented. Consequently, proactive employees intend to alter the self, co-workers, or the work context to adapt to the anticipated changing conditions. Hence, higher levels of proactivity reduce unnecessary workload and facilitate organizational change” (pp. 5-6). On the other hand, Benedict  reports that when “HR is involved in processes related to major organizational changes, it performs a variety of functions associated with the communication, implementation and tracking of such changes” (p. 7). Furthermore, Lockwood  stresses on the fact that, “HR has the ability to make a significant impact and contribution to the organization by initiating change, leading change and measuring change effectiveness” (pp. 31-32). Five areas were identified by Lockwood  as essential for HR to demonstrate value for change management. These are as follows:
“1) Communicating clearly plans and goals regarding change initiatives;
2) Hiring and developing good leaders;
3) Designing and implementing transparent reward systems;
4) Giving people the opportunity to be involved in the processes; and
5) Overall, making each interaction with internal clients a positive experience” (pp. 31-32).
Moreover, Mamin Ullah  believes that “HR Professionals should play the required roles to make the change effective by keeping employees high spirited and on the right track during and irrespective of the degree of organizational change. The roles of HR Professionals are not only important to manage the organizational change but also to create a culture of change in an organization” (p. 123). And more recently, Browning  stresses the role of HR by the fact that “companies wanting to successfully lead employees through adoption of an organizational change must follow a systematic, proactive approach that incorporates four primary steps: overcoming resistance, engaging employees, implementing change in phases and communicating the change” (Para 6).
Hejase and Hejase  contend that “through exploratory research, a researcher acquires deeper knowledge as to how to convert the problem of not having facts about the subject into a structured one” (p. 80). This research aims to elucidate the HR role in change management. However, to the best of the researchers’ knowledge the aforementioned research is not conducted in Lebanon. For that, primary data is needed to be collected from the field. Therefore, this study is exploratory conducted to study the topic using an inductive approach and a qualitative research methodology.
3.1. Interview Design
Primary data collection was performed using semi-structured interviews based on a structured questionnaire. Questions selected were sequentially arranged, simply worded, and using an open end style. The aforementioned helps organize the respondents’ thoughts and offers the researchers focused responses from different individuals, a fact that helps performing good content analysis.
The questions’ content was designed taking into consideration the research objectives and the literature assessment including the process of change and then focusing on the HRM role in that process. A total of eleven questions addressed the definitions of organizational change, change management, process of change, role of HR, role of HR in the change process, initiatives to reduce resistance, leadership roles, link between HR and change and finally proposition of a scheme.
3.2. Sample Size
Participants were selected conveniently (non-probabilistically) based on their willingness to participate as well as based on their experience and knowledge of the topic. Qualitative narrative analysis approach was used to analyze the content from interviews focusing on using the stories and experiences shared by people to address the research objectives. Data was collected during the period extending from February till April 2019. There are 70,062 registered Lebanese companies  (p. 11). The sample size is 398 participants in case quantitative analysis is performed with 95% significance, representing a population of 75,000 individuals assuming each company in Lebanon has at least one person expert in HR issues beside other professionals and instructors. However, this research represents a probe for the subject needed to identify selected variables so that a more in depth research is carried out later, therefore a qualitative research needs a minimum number of 10 to 15 interviewees to explore the topic under research, especially if experts are chosen.
All participants were human resource professionals and managers in addition to experienced academics in HRM and change management. Initially twelve professionals were approached, and only 6 were committed to an interview whose duration was two hours. However, later on another trial was performed during the month of June, and 20 professionals were approached whereby 6 more agreed to participate (see Table 1). Therefore, the response rate was 37.5% (12/32). Further, all participants were informed that their responses are confidential and will be only used for the analysis of this research.
Table 1. Participants were classified.
4. Results and Findings
Responses were collected from the interviewees and were analyzed following content analysis and based on dimensions discussed earlier in the literature review. All responses are presented in the form of Exhibits as classified.
The triggers in this research mean the forces from the external and internal business environment that stimulate change in the organizations. Interviewees’ comments are depicted in Table 2.
The General Role of HRM in Change Management
Interviewees tend to believe that HR professionals must be proactive rather than reactive to handle today’s world changes and it is not sufficient anymore to act classically to a certain threat. To handle change one must handle core functions in human resources that can affect the change process. See Table 2.
Oakland & Tanner ; McMillan ; Ryerson University ; and Robbins & Coulter  confirmed the aforementioned inputs reported in their research that organizations are affected by both internal and external forces which may include many different triggers.
In general academics and professionals agree that the general role of HR in the change process is managing change with a methodology that reduces resistance to its lowest levels possible, because human resources must understand people and their concerns and fears, where some consider HR as the facilitator of the change process while others consider it to be supportive.
Interviewees being professionals, experts and academicians, are clearly aware about the role of HR in the quest to reduce resistance and the endeavor to clarify the reasons and process of change to lower the organization’s community.
According to Zafar, Iqbal, Azad, & Afsar , “top management envisions the broader picture and motivates the change audience through change agents” (p. 57). However, it is the HR function which spreads around this change vision. “HR communication should be quick, precise and clear that can be understood by a wide range of people” (p. 57). Along the aforementioned, Lunenburg  asserts that “the methods used include job enrichment, goal setting, and behavior modification. The major assumption underlying this orientation is that if individuals change their behavior, the organization will also change, providing enough people within the organization change” (p. 2).
Table 2. Change triggers.
The Specific Role(s) of HRM in Change Management (the Five Functions)
Participants were asked to address the specific HR role in change management according to the five HR functions namely, Workforce Planning (WFP), Human Resource Development (HRD) (including Training & Development (TD) + Performance Management (PM)), Total Rewards (TR), Employee & Labor Relations (ELR), and Risk Management (RM). Their responses were as shown in Table 3.
All interviewees agree that the right recruitment and the right selection is essential for an organization not just in the change process but in all stages of the organizational life.
Human Resource Development (HRD)
This role within HR is extremely important in the change process. HRD has two main functions which are training and development and performance management, and when implementing any change an emergent need for training arises no matter what the change is, whether it was in culture, structure, processes, technology, operations, etc. where employees must be trained for those new changes.
The responses depicted in Table 4 must be put in a clearer context especially that foreign HR experts warn about dealing with change as a set of separate projects including training and development of employees, for example Walcroft  reports “Change is often seen as an initiative or series of programs, which may or may not be connected to each other, and each one can often run out of momentum.” Moreover, People Management Insight’s  report quotes Matt Jenkins, head of consulting at Footdown Co., saying “it’s important that organizations are aware that employees go through the change curve at different speeds” (p. 11). The views above, are basic to mitigate resistance though the challenge becomes providing full information and involvement in the process starting with the initial steps.
Total Rewards (TR)
Interviewees (all of them) contend that when evaluating the total rewards application which the HR function addresses, it is built up initially in the organization and rarely modified unless there is an external factor like new governmental laws, or an economic inflation in the country that the organization operated in, those rewards systems must be built up initially to motivate change and change agents.
Korn Ferry  contends that “for a rewards strategy to be truly effective, it must be implemented using a change management process that drives understanding, eases adoption and utilization, and keeps a laser focus on delivering intended results” (Para 1).
Table 3. Specific Roles of HRM in Change management.
Table 4. Specific Roles of HRM in Change management.
Employee and Labor Relations (ELR) and Risk Management (RM)
Andy Swann, a workplace consultant at BDG, quoted in “People Management Insight  ” asserted that “When people own change, they engage positively with it” (p. 10). Interviewee’ inputs are summarized in Table 5.
Leadership, HRM, and Change Management
One fundamental condition for the success of change programs is having a complete fit between the organizations’ leadership, their HR function, and clear and purposeful change management plans. According to Burnes and Jackson  report, “70% of all change initiatives fail. One potentially significant reason for this is a lack of alignment between the value system of the change intervention and of those members of an organization undergoing the change” (p. 133). Furthermore, organizational value system is triggered by the leadership, a fact that adds huge responsibility towards change management initiatives which may lead to either success or failure of change programs. Other researchers stress the importance of having adequate leadership. “Through appropriate leadership style and leaders’ participation” , and having “leaders who act as role drivers as well as role models” , leaders would be able to “influence and ultimately change the behaviors of employees, teams and the organization at large”  (p. 147). The aforementioned are determinants of success in organizational change programs. Success of initiatives for change therefore depends on the leaders’ preparation adequacy of the self as well as their institutions for the change programs .
Next, Table 6: shows what the interviewees opined about the matter.
Table 5. Specific Roles of HRM in Change management.
Table 6. Leadership, HRM and change management.
5. Conclusion and Recommendations
This study was carried out to assess the relation between Human Resource Management and the Change Process from the point of view of a selected number of Lebanese academicians and practitioners who actually practice contemporary HR functions. In-depth semi structured interviews revealed that the managers, experts, professionals and professors transmitted the actual view of Lebanese companies’ practices related to HR management key roles in change management. However, the realities of the matter lead to what Deshler  has reported that “many leaders learn through trial and error how to lead effectively during change. Unfortunately, their learning curve can be at the expense of the organization” (Para 6). The reason, which has been observed in many Lebanese organizations matches what Deshler  found as well, “Having and practicing a change management mentality are two different things. Lots of leaders want change, but only a select few actually help make it happen” (Para 4).
This study was based on an open system approach which characterizes organizations as open organisms which are in dynamic exchange of resources with their external business environment forces. More specifically, the results stressed on the impact of the external and internal environments of the organization, fitting triggers for change management (    ). The outcome is to renew, on a continuous basis, an organizational direction, structure, and capabilities to adapt, offer quick response and serve the ever changing needs of customers (external and internal). Further, this study aimed to identify the HR management role in the ongoing change process in organizations. The general role of HR management in the process of change was asserted by the interviewees and summarized by the fact that organizations continuously seek innovating change and keeping up with it to monitor and correct any observed gaps as asserted by Lockwood . Also, emphasis was stressed on the role of coupling the change process to organizational strategy as recommended by Adeniji, Osibanjo, & Abiodun . Further, researchers like Akinbode and Al Shuhumi  posit that “Strategic change has to do with broad, long-term and organization-wide range issues. In implementing this change, the purpose and mission of the organization, as well as its corporate philosophy are considered. The change leaders also carry out the required SWOT (by considering the Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats) analysis to determine how the change program will be initiated” (p. 612).
HR practitioners and professionals [both academicians and experts] are aware of the barriers which may cause serious problems to the success of the change process in the organization, where the change would not be positive and sustainable if HR did not act upon its roles correctly. In particular, interviewees warned against not involving employees fully in the process as advised by Korn Ferry , which strongly recommends organizational leaders to “employ critical communications strategies that weave new programs into the fabric of the organization, and define and reinforce each person’s role in implementing smart rewards strategies for a bright and successful future” (Para 2).
Managers and HR professionals must be knowledgeable of the change process and must be ready along the five HR functions to framework and plan change, also they must have compatible leadership skills in order to ensure the smooth transition of state, thus, leading to reduction of resistance and increasing productivity. One golden rule here is the full engagement of employees. People Management Insight , quotes Andy Swann, a workplace consultant at BDG, in “The challenges and opportunities facing HR in 2017” report, saying “It’s not a case of completely changing an organization’s structure to allow constant, natural evolution, it’s more a case of unleashing people through the flow of information up, down and around the organization. It’s not so complicated and when this happens, change can be adopted much more easily”. Swann (quoted in  ) has “five golden rules for companies undergoing a change management program: 1) Put people first; 2) Consider the impact; 3) Give everyone ownership of the change; 4) Communicate constantly and openly; and 5) Think differently” (p. 11).
This research has the tribute of being one of the first to address the topic, though limitations also exist manifested with the small sample leading to the fact that findings and results may not be generalized but may be taken seriously as indicators for future work. Future research is to run a quantitative study across the diverse economic sector institutions of Lebanon to assess best practices and explore to what extent these organizations are aware of the importance of the HR role in the change process.
The findings of this study could be validated in future studies and research where researchers from Lebanon and abroad are invited to explore and assess to what extent organizations are aware about the change management approaches with the HR function acting as a change agent.
This research is considered an eye opener and therefore with positive contribution to the scarce literature about the HR role in the change management in Lebanon. The outcomes are encouraging though exploratory in nature necessitating that researchers in Lebanon as well as the region run similar studies to create a clearer view about the awareness of the HR role and the understanding of change management process and its requirements. Furthermore, explore the readiness of the Lebanese and the regional job markets to deal with changes in all aspects and the needed competencies for consultants and strategists. HR functions in Lebanese organizations need to be aware that they must institute employee engagement programs, a fact that will mitigate resistance for the coming change plans of their organizations.