JWARP  Vol.11 No.11 , November 2019
Hydrogeophysical Characterization of a Weathered-Fractured Aquifer System: A Case Study of Olbanita, Lower Baringo Basin, Kenya Rift
Abstract: Groundwater yields in the Kenya Rift are highly unsustainable owing to geological variability. In this study, field hydraulic characterization was performed by using geo-electric approaches. The relations between electrical–hydraulic (eh) conductivities were modeled hypothetically and calibrated empirically. Correlations were based on the stochastic models and field-scale hydraulic parameters were contingent on pore-level parameters. By considering variation in pore-size distributions over eh conduction interval, the relations were scaled-up for use at aquifer-level. Material-level electrical conductivities were determined by using Vertical Electrical Survey and hydraulic conductivities by analyzing aquifer tests of eight boreholes in the Olbanita aquifer located in Kenya rift. VES datasets were inverted by using the computer code IP2Win. The main result is that InT = 0.537(1nFa) + 3.695, the positive gradient indicating eh conduction through pore-surface networks and a proxy of weathered and clayey materials. An inverse (1/F-K) correlation is observed. Hydraulic parameters determined using such approaches may possibly contribute significantly towards sustainable yield management and planning of groundwater resources.
Cite this paper: Sosi, B. , Barongo, J. , Getabu, A. and Maobe, S. (2019) Hydrogeophysical Characterization of a Weathered-Fractured Aquifer System: A Case Study of Olbanita, Lower Baringo Basin, Kenya Rift. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 11, 1408-1425. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2019.1111082.

[1]   Yuan, L., Sun, H., et al. (2018) Temporal Scaling Analytical Method to Identify Multifractionality in Groundwater Head Fluctuations. Ground Water, 57, 485-491.

[2]   Habib, A., Sorensen, J.P. and Bloomfield, J.P. (2017) Temporal Scaling Phenomena in Ground-Water-Floodplain Systems Using Robust Detrended Fluctuation Analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 549, 715-730.

[3]   Koedel, U. (2018) International Conference on Novel Methods for Subsurface Characterization and Monitoring: From Theory to Practice: NovCare 2017. Environmental Earth Sciences.

[4]   McLachlan, P.J., Chambers, J.E., Uhlemann, S.S., et al. (2017) Geophysical Characterization of the Groundwater Surface Water Interface. Advances in Water Resources, 109, 302-319.

[5]   Medici, G., West, L.J. and Mountney, N.P. (2018) Characterization of a Fluvial Aquifer at a Range of Depths and Scales: The Triassic St Bees Sandstone Formation, Cumbria, UK. Hydrogeology Journal, 26, 565-591.

[6]   Paz, C., Alcalá, F.J., Carvalho, J.M. and Ribeiro, L. (2017) Current Uses of Ground Penetrating Radar in Groundwater-Dependent Ecosystems Research. Science of the Total Environment, 595, 868-885.

[7]   Dubreuil-Boisclair, C., Gloaguen, E., Marcotte, D. and Giroux, B. (2011) Heterogeneous Aquifer Characterization from Ground-Penetrating Radar Tomography and Borehole Hydrogeo-physical Data Using Nonlinear Bayesian Simulations. Geophysics, 76, J13-J25.

[8]   Ren, S., Parsekian, A.D., Zhang, Y., et al. (2019) Hydraulic Conductivity Calibration of Logging NMR in a Granite Aquifer, Laramie Range, Wyoming. Groundwater, 57, 303-319.

[9]   Niu, F.-J., Gao, Z.-Y., Lin, Z.-J., et al. (2019) Vegetation Influence on the Soil Hydrological Regime in Permafrost Regions of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Geoderma, 354, Article ID: 113892.

[10]   Grunewald, E. and Walsh, D. (2018) Recent Advancements and Applications of Logging and Surface Magnetic Resonance for Groundwater Investigations. 1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference—Exploration Innovation Integration, Vol. 2018, 1.

[11]   Sun, X., Xiang, Y. and Shi, Z. (2018). Estimating the Hydraulic Parameters of a Confined Aquifer Based on the Response of Groundwater Levels to seismic Rayleigh Waves. Geophysical Journal International, 213, 919-930.

[12]   Bernabé, Y., Li, M. and Maineult, A. (2010) Permeability and Pore Connectivity: A New Model Based on Network Simulations. Journal Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115, 1-14.

[13]   Bernabé, Y., Zamora, M., Li, M., et al. (2011) Pore Connectivity, Permeability, and Electrical Formation Factor: A New Model and Comparison to Experimental Data. Journal Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 116, 1-15.

[14]   Wang, P., Chen, H.L., Meng, X.H., et al. (2018) Uncertainty Quantification on the Macroscopic Properties of Heterogeneous Porous Media. Physical Review E, 98, Article ID: 033306.

[15]   Purviance, T.D. and Andricevic, R. (2000) On the Electrical-Hydraulic Conductivity Correlation in Aquifers. Water Resources Research, 36, 2905-2913.

[16]   Sosi, B. (2013) Hydraulic Characterization of the Kabatini Aquifer, Upper Lake Nakuru Basin, Kenya Rift, Using Geophysical and Pumping Test Data. International Journal Development and Sustainability, 2, 2093-2109.

[17]   Dhakate, R. (2011) Hydrogeophysical Parameter Estimation for Aquifer Characterisation in Hard Rock Environments: A Case Study from Jangaon Sub-Watershed, India. Journal of Oceanography and Marine Science, 2, 50-62.

[18]   Spariharijaona, A., Eswaran, P., Joel, B., et al. (2019) Static Dissolution-Induced 3D Pore Network Modification and Its Impact on Critical Pore Attributes of Carbonate Rocks. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 46, 374-383.

[19]   Li, M., Tang, Y.B., Bernabé, Y., et al. (2017) Percolation Connectivity, Pore Size, and Gas Apparent Permeability: Network Simulations and Comparison to Experimental Data. Journal of Geo-Physical Research: Solid Earth, 122, 4918-4930.

[20]   Telford, W.M., Telford, W.M., Geldart, L.P., et al. (1990) Applied Geophysics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[21]   Fetter, C. (1990) Applied Hydrogeology. 2nd Edition, CBS Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi, 592.

[22]   Medici, G., West, L.J., Chapman, P.J., et al. (2019) Prediction of Contaminant Transport in Fractured Carbonate Aquifer Types: A Case Study of the Permian Magnesian Limestone Group (NE England, UK). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 24863-24884.

[23]   Maréchal, J.C. and Dewandel, B. (2004) Use of Hydraulic Tests at Different Scales to Characterize Fracture Network Properties in the Weathered-Fractured Layer of a Hard Rock Aquifer. Water Resources Research, 40, W11508.

[24]   Colombier, M., Wadsworth, F.B., Gurioli, L., et al. (2017) The Evolution of Pore Connectivity in Volcanic Rocks. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 462, 99-109.

[25]   Weijermars, R. and Khanal, A. (2019) Elementary Pore Network Models Based on Complex Analysis Methods (CAM): Fundamental Insights for Shale Field Development. Energies, 12, 1243.

[26]   Hill, M.E., Stewart, M.T. and Martin, A. (2010) Evaluation of the MODFLOW-2005 Conduit Flow Process. Groundwater, 48, 549-559.

[27]   Ju, J.-F., Li, Q.-S., Xu, J.-L., et al. (2019) Self-Healing Effect of Water-Conducting Fractures Due to Water-Rock Interactions in Undermined Rock Strata and Its Mechanisms. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 1-11.

[28]   Jiang, Z., Van-Dijke, M.I.J., Geiger, S., et al. (2017) Pore Network Extraction for Fractured Porous Media. Advances in Water Resources, 107, 280-289.

[29]   Renshaw, C.E. and Dadakis, J.S. (2000) Measuring Fracture Apertures: A Comparison of Methods. Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 289-292.

[30]   Bernabé, Y., Li, M., Tang, Y.B. and Brian, E. (2016) Pore Space Connectivity and the Transport Properties of Rocks. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 71, 50.

[31]   Wong, P., Koplik, J. and Tomanic, J.P. (1984) Conductivity and Permeability of Rocks. Physical Review B, 30, 6606-6614.

[32]   Bernabé, Y. and Bruderer, C. (1998) Effect of the Variance of Pore Size Distribution on the Transport Properties of Heterogeneous Networks. Journal Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 103, 513-526.

[33]   Salem, H.S. and Chilingarian, G.V. (1999) The Cementation Factor of Archie’s Equation for Shaly Sandstone Reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 23, 83-93.

[34]   Hynek, S., Comas, X. and Brantley, S.L. (2017) The Effect of Fractures on Weathering of Igneous and Volcaniclastic Sedimentary Rocks in the Puerto Rican Tropical Rain Forest. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 17, 972-975.

[35]   Revil, A., Murugesu, M., Prasad, M., et al. (2017) Alteration of Volcanic Rocks: A New Non-Intrusive Indicator Based on Induced Polarization Measurements. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 341, 351-362.

[36]   Ahmed, A.S., Revil, A., Byrdina, S., et al. (2018) 3D Electrical Conductivity Tomography of Volcanoes. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 356, 243-263.

[37]   Dai, S., Santamarina, J.C., Waite, W.F., et al. (2012) Hydrate Morphology: Physical Properties of Sands with Patchy Hydrate Saturation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 117, B11205.

[38]   Koch, K., Kemna, A., Irving, J. and Holliger, K. (2011) Impact of Changes in Grain Size and Pore Space on the Hydraulic Conductivity and Spectral Induced Polarization Response of Sand. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 1785-1794.

[39]   Schoen, J.H. (2011) Physical Properties of Rocks: A Workbook. Vol. 8, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

[40]   Deka, M. and Kumar, A. (2010) Enhanced Electrical and Electrochemical Properties of PMMA-Clay Nanocomposite Gel Polymer Electrolytes. Electrochimica Acta, 55, 1836-1842.