For hadrons, the relation between mass m and quantum numbers is usually described by the Regge-Chew-Frautschi formula  ,
where are constants for the exited states of the same kind particle. In many cases, the coefficients satisfy  . The Regge trajectory is an important tool widely used to analyze the spectroscopy of mesons and baryons. Various theoretical models have been constructed to explain the mass spectra of particles and to derive the Regge trajectories, such as non-relativistic quark models  - , flux tube model or similar string model   - , semi-relativistic potential model    , relativistic potential model     , quantum chromodynamics (QCD) sum rule   , color hyperfine interaction    , Lattice QCD model      and so on. There are also some Regge phenomenology investigations    - . By statistical and regressive method to get the relation .
In many models, the total potential between quarks is given by Cornell potential with some hyperfine terms of correction, and the mass spectrum is solved in relative Jacobi coordinates       . In , by semi classical approximation and Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization, the Regge-like relation and for large is derived for power-law confining potentials . By the phenomenological researches, we also find that the Regge-Chew-Frautschi formula (1.1) is only approximately valid, and a little nonlinearity always exists   . The specific Regge trajectories depend on concrete confining potential. However, no matter what confining potential is, the analytic relation for the excited states always exists.
Recently, a number of experimental data for highly exited resonances were reported  - . These data provide opportunity to check the previous calculations and develop more effective models. As pointed out in , a better understanding of the nucleon as a bound state of quarks and gluons as well as the spectrum and internal structure of excited baryons remains a fundamental challenge and goal in hadronic physics. In particular, the mapping of the nucleon excitations provides access to strong interactions in the domain of quark confinement. While the peculiar phenomenon of confinement is experimentally well established and believed to be true, it remains analytically unproven and the connection to quantum chromodynamics (QCD)—the fundamental theory of the strong interactions—is only poorly understood. In the early years of the 20th century, the study of the hydrogen spectrum has established without question that the understanding of the structure of a bound state and of its excitation spectrum needs to be addressed simultaneously. The spectroscopy of excited baryon resonances and the study of their properties are thus complementary to understanding the structure of the nucleon in deep inelastic scattering experiments that provide access to the properties of its constituents in the ground state.
The quark models employ multiplets of spinors and nonlinear interactive vectors with gauge symmetries, which are too complicated to get exact solutions and an overview for the properties. In this paper we examine the following simple and closed Dirac equation with short range self-generating vector potential ,
in which . (1.2) has plentiful spectra. By the Regge trajectories we find the excited states may be relevant to some of baryons.
2. Equations and Simplification
At first, we introduce some notations. Denote the Minkowski metric by , Pauli matrices by
Define Hermitian matrices as follows
where , and . By variation of (1.2) we get the Dirac equation and dynamics of ,
For the eigen states of , only the magnetic quantum number and the sipn s are conserved. So the eigen solution takes the following form
where the index “T” stands for transpose, , and are real functions of r and . However, the exact solution of (2.5) does not exist, and we have to solve it by effective algorithm  . Since the numerical solutions are also unhelpful to understand the global structure of the mass spectrum, we seek for the approximate analytic solutions in this paper.
Different from the case of an electron, a proton has a hard core with charge distribution, and the radius of the distribution is about 1 × 10−15 m. The following calculation shows the local parabolic potential is approximately equal to near the center, then we have
in which w is the strength factor, is a parameter to adjust the depth of confinement to fit the true confining potential. is the theoretical Compton wave length, which is used for nondimensionalization of the Dirac equation.
In order to simplify (1.2), we make transformation 
Substituting (2.5), (2.6) and (2.7) into (1.2) we get Lagrangian as
in which we defined
where stands for taking real part, and
In (2.9), is relative mass defect defined by
and is used as length unit, is a constant to let so that convergent rate of the procedure is optimized. In the case (2.6), we set which is about the mean value of the potential in the effective domain, and then can be omitted for the 0th order approximation. For proton we have
In (2.8), almost keeps all invariance of relativity and has simple and complete eigensolutions, which can be used as the bases of Hilbert space of representation. is the trouble terms with small energy, which acts as perturbation in the calculation. If taking , (2.8) becomes dimensionless.
For (2.9), the rigorous eigen solutions take the following form 
By variation of (2.9), we get
in which corresponding to orbital angular momentum, are associated Legendre functions. The radial functions satisfy
in which we defined
where is dimensionless mass. The above equations can be easily solved, and the solutions are all elementary functions. The normalizing conditions are as follows
3. Eigen Solutions to the Equation
For (2.16), we have the solution
where is associated Laguerre polynomials, n is radial quantum number, and J is angular momentum quantum number; corresponds to and corresponds to . The energy spectrum and radius parameter is given by
Substituting (2.19) into (3.3) we get Regge-like relation as follows
In (3.5), we have 3 constants for the same series of particles to be determined by empirical data. Although the form of (3.5) or (3.6) is quite different from (1.1), the following calculation shows that the curves of (3.5) in the effective domain are quite near straight lines (see Figure 1).
Substituting (3.1) and (3.3) into (2.17), we can derive V. By calculation we get
For all meaningful eigen solutions, we have , and then we have . Therefore, the relative truncation error for the 0th approximation is about 10%.
The ground state corresponds to , and then we have . Considering energy degeneracy, we only need to calculate the energy spectrums while . For the ground state of proton, we have empirical data
Figure 1. Regge trajectroies of (3.5). Each intersection between lines and curves corresponds to one or more particles, and we have about 90 intersections in the figure. Considering degenerate states, the figure contains more than 1000 particles with different quantum numbers .
and . Substituting them and into (2.11), (2.12), (2.18) and (3.4), we get constants expressed by . If taking , we have solution
For a proton, by (3.9) we find . By (2.11) and we find the relative mass defect of strong interaction confinement is about 33%. The observational mass is much less than constant mass . This case is quite different from an electron without strong interaction.
Substituting (3.9) and into (3.5), (3.6) and (3.7), we find the masses of many baryons are near the spectra, and (3.5) is quite similar to the Regge trajectories of baryons (see Figure 1). By (3.3) and (3.4), we find the radius parameter of the excited states even decreases a little when the quantum number N increases. The detailed calculation shows we always have for all particles. This means a particle with local parabolic potential or short distance potential has a very hard core. This phenomenon is quite different from the case of Coulomb potential, where we have .
For convenience, we take J as row index and n as column index, then the mass spectrums of the eigen states are listed in Table 1.
We find the masses of many baryons are near the spectra. Obviously each excited state should correspond to an observable particle. This means some baryons can be regarded as excited resonances of a proton. How to exactly identify the quantum numbers for each particle observed in experiments is an important but fallible problem.
As the 0th order approximation with only 3 free coefficients, the result is satisfactory. To get more accurate solutions of (1.2), we can expand as series of the eigen functions of (2.9) and then solve mass spectra of (1.2) . However, in this case, we have only numerical results without an overview on the spectra.
4. Effectiveness of the Parabolic Potential
Now we check the effectiveness of the parabolic potential for nuclear potential. It is well known the global parabolic potential cannot be used as confining potential of Dirac equation. However, the following calculations show the local parabolic potential is effective to describe nuclear potential approximately.
At first, we check all radial functions and their module are almost distributed in the domain , where is also the effective area of the local parabolic potential. The first couple of the radial functions is given by
Table 1. Mass spectra of Dirac equation with local parabolic potential (MeV).
Figure 2. Some radial wave functions of a spinor in local parabolic potential.
Figure 3. The effective domain of local parabolic potential and modules of radial wave functions. The spinor with short distance potential is mainly concentrated near the center, and it does not diffuse when K or n increases.
as length unit.
Secondly, for the following short-range potential with source ,
By Figure 4, we find the solution is almost parabolic potential in the domain for the above source, for which the normalizing condition is . This means in the interior of a baryon, the potential of strong interaction may be different from the Cornell potential or potential generated by point source or the MIT bag model. It may be more suitably described by local parabolic potential.
Thirdly, by (3.3) we find that, different from electron in Coulomb potential, in this case, the radius parameter of the wave function even decreases a little as the increasing of quantum number N. So the local parabolic potential is also suitable for the excited states.
5. Discussion and Conclusion
As the 0th order approximation, the above calculation provides some important messages. The Dirac equation with short distance potential has quite different energy spectrum and eigen functions from that with Coulomb potential. Dirac equation is a magic equation with marvellous properties which should be strictly analyzed   . The nuclear potential may be more similar to local parabolic
potential, rather than the MIT bag model or or . Obviously,
Figure 4. The parabolic potential versus the short range potential generated by .
To get more accurate results, we should directly calculate the coupling system of (2.4) and (2.3), and expand the radial functions upon the bases of the representation space . However, in this case, we have not explicit analytic expression (3.3) for mass spectra.
As the alternative models for fundamental particles, some simple and closed systems such as the following one are worth to be carefully studied,
Some deep secrets may be concealed under the nonlinear potential F and short distance potentials, because the spinor equation is a magic equation.
If we denote, where are basis eigenfunctions in the Hilbert space of representation, and is the main component. Substituting them into (5.1) and using the orthogonality of, we get
In (5.2), may be easily interpreted as quarks with fraction electric charge and confinement, and the cross terms G may be interpreted as gauge fields. For any complicated mathematical models, a little vigilance should be remained, because Nature only uses simple but best mathematics, and the complicated equations easily lead to inconsistence and singularity.
On the other hand, the regression analysis for empirical data to derive mass function with single integer variable for similar particles is much important, because like Hydrogen spectra, such analytic function certainly exists and is usually very simple, and then to determine the further relation between quantum numbers is relatively easy. This procedure needs not to concern the physical meanings of N at first and gets rid of the fallible and misleading task to identify the quantum numbers n and J for each particle at the beginning. If we can arrange the masses of similar particles from small to large at each horizontal integer coordinates N to get smooth curves, the regressive function for all smooth curves can be derived. From the final mass function of high precision, we can determine the specific potentials in Dirac equation conversely.
 Yoshida, T., Hiyama, E., Hosaka, A., Oka, M. and Sadato, K. (2015) Spectrum of Heavy Baryons in the Quark Model. Physical Review D, 92, Article ID: 114029.
 Thakkara, K., Shahb, Z., Raib, A.K. and Vinodkumar, P.C. (2017) Excited State Mass Spectra and Regge Trajectories of Bottom Baryons. Nuclear Physics A, 965, 57-73.
 Baker, M. and Steinke, R. (2002) Semiclassical Quantization of Effective String Theory and Regge Trajectories. Physical Review D, 65, Article ID: 094042.
 Chen, B., Wei, K.W. and Zhang, A. (2015) Assignments of ΛQ and ΞQ Baryons in the Heavy Quark-Light Diquark Picture. The European Physical Journal A, 51, 82.
 Ebert, D., Faustov, R.N. and Galkin, V.O. (2011) Spectroscopy and Regge Trajectories of Heavy Baryons in the Relativistic Quark-Diquark Picture. Physical Review D, 84, Article ID: 014025.
 Jia, D., Pang, C.Q. and Hosaka, A. (2017) Mass Formula for Light Nonstrange Mesons and Regge Trajectories in Quark Model. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 32, Article ID: 1750153.
 Ebert, D., Faustov, R.N. and Galkin, V.O. (2009) Mass Spectra and Regge Trajectories of Light Mesons in the Relativistic Quark Model. Physical Review D, 79, Article ID: 114029.
 Yamaguchi, Y., Ohkoda, S., Hosaka, A., Hyodo, T. and Yasui, S. (2015) Heavy Quark Symmetry in Multihadron Systems, Physical Review D, 91, Article ID: 034034.
 Llanes-Estrada, F.J., Cotanch, S.R., Szczepaniak, A.P. and Swanson, E.S. (2004) Hyperfine Meson Splittings: Chiral Symmetry versus Transverse Gluon Exchange. Physical Review C, 70, Article ID: 035202.
 Thakkar, K., Majethiya, A. and Vinodlumar, P.C. (2016) Magnetic Moments of Baryons Containing All Heavy Quarks in Quark-Diquark Model. The European Physical Journal Plus, 131, 339.
 Brown, Z.S., Detmold, W., Meinel, S. and Orginos, K. (2014) Charmed Bottom Baryon Spectroscopy from Lattice QCD. Physical Review D, 90, Article ID: 094507.
 Padmanath, M. and Mathur, N. (2017) Quantum Numbers of Recently Discovered π_c^0 Baryons from Lattice QCD. Physical Review Letters, 119, Article ID: 042001.
 Wei, K.W., Chen, B., Liu, N., Wang, Q.Q. and Guo, X.H. (2017) Spectroscopy of Singly, Doubly, and Triply Bottom Baryons. Physical Review D, 95, Article ID: 116005.
 Aaij, R., et al. (2016) Observation of Λb0→ψ(2S)pK- and Λb0→J/ψπ+π-pK- Decays and a Measurement of the Λb0 Baryon Mass. Journal of High Energy Physics, 1605, 132.