JWARP  Vol.11 No.11 , November 2019
Tap Water versus Bottled Water: A Pilot Study
Abstract: The aim of this exploratory research and comparative numerical pilot study was to investigate any significant differences in the microbiological content of tap and bottled water through the measurement of risk indicator parameters including Enterococci, Escherichia coli (E. coli) and colony-forming units (CFUs). This study to investigate storage conditions and compare consumer options of public water supply and bottled water using microbiological limits was carried out for public health research. This was a unique pilot study to Northern Ireland with global relevance due to the increase in the bottled water market and the need to address the lack of consumer awareness regarding storage and microbiological content. No E. coli or Enterococci were found in any of the 31 tap or bottled water samples. Three unrefrigerated bottled water samples exceeded the threshold in Colony Counts 22°C & 37°C (degrees Celsius) and failed in line with Drinking Water Directive guidelines. This indicated a link between storage conditions and microbiological quality. No link between prices or microbiological quality was indicated. This research recommends the creation of a regulator for the bottled water industry, the need for clearly labelled microbiological content and daily testing. Water suppliers such as Northern Ireland (NI) Water should promote the quality of tap water. Recommendations are also outlined for consumers. There is no statistically significant difference in the microbiological quality of tap and bottled water in Northern Ireland despite marketing claims.
Cite this paper: Knox, R. and McDermott, R. (2019) Tap Water versus Bottled Water: A Pilot Study. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 11, 1398-1407. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2019.1111081.

[1]   FiltersFast (2017) Bottled Water versus Tap Water. FiltersFast.

[2]   Zenith Global (2016) Reports and Data.

[3]   Research and Markets (2016) Global Bottled Water Industry.

[4]   Napier, G. and Kodner, C. (2008) Health Risks and Benefits of Bottled Water. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, 35, 789-802.

[5]   Express Micro Science (2017) Drinking Water Tests.

[6]   Official Journal of the European Community (2016) Drinking Water Directive Annex I 80/778/EEC.

[7]   World Health Organization (2011) Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality.

[8]   Kerr, M. (2001) The Survival of Escherichia coli 0157: H7 in Natural Mineral Water. Ph.D. Thesis, Ulster University, Northern Ireland.

[9]   Hinds, J. (2008) What’s in Your Water?: The Shocking Truth about Bottled Water and Tap Water and How You Can Protect Yourself, J.A.H Enterprises.

[10]   Tricker, R. (2009) Water Regulations in Brief.

[11]   Rocwell (2017) Benefits of Rocwell Water.

[12]   Younger, P. (2013) Bottled Water “Not as Safe as Tap Variety”.

[13]   Ayres, L.W. and Lalumandier, J.A. (2000) Fluoride and Bacterial Content of Bottled Water vs. Tap Water. Archives of Family Medicine, 9, 246-250.

[14]   International Bottled Water Association (2017) The Healthy Choice.

[15]   BBC News Northern Ireland (2019).

[16]   Mappery (2017) Northern Ireland Geograph-ical Sample Map, Mappery.

[17]   Cidu, R., Frau, F. and Tore, P. (2011) Drinking Water Quality: Comparing Inorganic Components in Bottled Water and Italian Tap Water. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 24, 184-193.

[18]   Barclay, E. (2010) Why Tap Water Is Better than Bottled Wa-ter.

[19]   Tukur, A. (2011) Antimony and Acetaldehyde Migration from Nigerian and British PET Bottles into Water and Soft Drinks under Typical Use Conditions: Concentration of Migrants and Some Trace Elements in Polyethylene Terephthalate and in Bottled Contents. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bradford, Bradford.

[20]   Northern Ireland Water (2017) Publications.

[21]   Majd, S. (2015) Should You Drink Tap or Bottled Water?

[22]   Pant, N.D., Poudyal, N. and Bhattacharya, S.K. (2016) Bacteriological quality of Bottled Drinking Water versus Municipal Tap Water in Dharan Municipality, Nepal. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition, 35, 17.