Back
 CUS  Vol.7 No.4 , December 2019
Reflections of Urban Transformation on Horizontal City Landscape and Household: Adana Çukurova District Municipality Houses
Abstract: In Turkey, urban planning works are staying on the agenda with the decisions made at the central level. Because these urban works reached their purpose in some of our cities, whereas these urban works became a big problem of our society. Urban transformation works covering population and settlement problems of human geography will be examined as urban geography and population problems and recommendations for solution will be made. Within the scope of this study, spatial and social changes on the city made by houses that are going to build over the Adana &#199ukurova District Municipality Houses and single-detached houses will be discussed and results obtained through interviews will be interpreted with a geographic point of view. Allocation of apartments according to plot size and the property owners will be indebted are the greatest concerns of property owners. The problems that will arise from the big identity change caused by vertical growth with the construction in the Municipality Houses will be analyzed and the expectations and concerns of people living in Municipality Houses will be determined.
Cite this paper: Öcal, T. (2019) Reflections of Urban Transformation on Horizontal City Landscape and Household: Adana Çukurova District Municipality Houses. Current Urban Studies, 7, 517-538. doi: 10.4236/cus.2019.74026.
References

[1]   Akinci, M. (2007). Idare, Insan Haklari ve Planlama Hukuku. Istanbul: Maltepe üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi.

[2]   Arslan, H. (2014). Kentsel Dönüsüm Süreçlerinin Kentsel Haklar Temelinde Değerlendirilmesi Gerekliligi. KMü Sosyal ve Ekonomik Arastirmalar Dergisi, 16, 33-41.
https://doi.org/10.18493/kmusekad.01749

[3]   Aydinli, H. I., & Kaya, A. (2013). Yargi Kararlari Örnekleri Ile Türkiye’de Kentsel DönüSüm Uygulamalarinin Sorun Alanlari. In Afyon Kocatepe üniversitesi, IIBF Dergisi (C. XV, S. II) (pp. 449-467). Afyonkarahisar.
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/18856

[4]   Fischel, W. A. (2000). Zoning and Land Use Regulation. In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Vol. 2, pp. 403-423). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=3XrGDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA120&dq=Fischel

[5]   Göksu, F. (2003) Kentsel DönüSüm Projelerine Yenilikçi Yaklasimlar, Kentsel Dönüsüm Sempozyumu (pp. 270-279). Istanbul: Yildiz Teknik üniversitesi.

[6]   Hardal, S. (2014). Kentsel Dönüsüm Alanlarina Bir Örnek: Sarigöl Mahallesi. Bilecik: Basilmamis Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bilecik Seyh Edebali üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Coğrafya Anabilim Dali.

[7]   Haziran (1996). Tarihleri arasinda Istanbul’da gerçeklestirilen “Birlesmis Milletler Insan ... Konferansi (Habitat II)”.
https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/habitat/editordosya/file/dokumanlar/Istanbul%20Deklerasyonu.pdf

[8]   Heimlich, R., & Anderson, W. (2001). Development at the Urban Fringe and Beyond: Impacts on Agriculture and Rural Land. Agricultural Economic Report No. AER-803.
https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=41364

[9]   Janssen-Jansen, L. Spaans, L., & Van der Ven, M. (2008). New Instruments in Spatial Planning: An International Perspective on Non-Financial Compensation. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A5c051f70-96ad-48ae-a85f-d590a2c42c3f

[10]   Kiliç, T., & Hardal, S. (2015). Kentsel Dönüsüm Sürecinde Yok Olan Mahalle Kültürü: Sarigöl Mahallesi (Sen Mahalle) Örneği. In Türkiye Dördüncü Nüfusbilim Konferansi Tebliğ Metinleri Kitabi (pp. 169-176). Ankara: Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü.
https://www.academia.edu/35408695/Kentsel_D%C3%B6n%C3%BC%C5%9F%C3%BCm_S%C3%BCrecinde_Yok_Olan_Mahalle_K%C3%BClt%C3%BCr%C3%BC_Sar%C4%B1g%C3%B6l
_Mahallesi_%C5%9Een_Mahalle_%C3%96rne%C4%9Fi


[11]   Koca, H., & Karadeniz, V. (2014). Erzincan Ovasinda Toki Uygulamalari ve Kentlesme üzerindeki Etkileri. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 19, 101-128.
https://doi.org/10.17295/dcd.74420
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunidcd/issue/2459/31354

[12]   Mills, D. E. (1989). Is Zoning a Negative-Sum Game? Land Economics, 65, 1-12.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3146258?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
https://doi.org/10.2307/3146258


[13]   Nelson, R. H. (1977). Zoning and Property Rights: An Analysis of the American System of Land-Use Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
https://archive.org/details/ZoningAndP_00_Nels

[14]   Öcal, T., & Çaliskan, V. (2017). Yavuzlar (Yüreğir-Adana) Mahallesi Kentsel Dönüsümü Ile Toki Konutlarinin Karsilastirmali Analizi. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, Temmuz Sayi, 36, 147-161.
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/marucog/issue/30253/329068

[15]   Özsoy, A. (2012). Toplu Konut Uygulamalarinin Gelisimi-Bir Değerlendirme. Ekolojik Yapilar ve Yerlesimler Dergisi, 3, 42-46.
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunidcd/article/31354

[16]   Pogodzinski, J. M., & Sass, T. R. (1990). The Economic Theory of Zoning: A Critical Review. Land Economics, 66, 294-314.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3146731
https://econpapers.repec.org/article/uwplandec/v_3a66_3ay_3a1990_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a294-314.htm

[17]   Rydin, Y. (1993). The British Planning System. London: Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22823-2
https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=skldDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Rydin,+Y.+(1993

[18]   Rydin, Y. (1998). Land Use Planning and Environmental Capacity: Reassessing the Use of Regulatory Policy Tools to Achieve Sustainable Development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41, 749-765.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640569811407
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640569811407

[19]   Shahab, S., Clincha, J. P., & O’Neilla, E. (2018). Timing and Distributional Aspects of Transaction Costs in Transferable Development Rights Programmes. Habitat International, 75, 131-138.
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/habitatint
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.03.006


[20]   Shahab, S., Clincha, J. P., & O’Neilla, E. (2019). An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Transaction Costs in Transferable Development Rights Programmes. Ecological Economics, 156, 409-419.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.018
https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v156y2019icp409-419.html

[21]   Sirma, R. T., & Çaçtas Ceylan, E. (2009). Gecekondu Alanlarinda Kentsel Dönüsüm Uygulamasina Bir Örnek: Küçükçekmece/Ayazma-Tepeüstü Kentsel Dönüsüm Projesi. Çağdas Yerel Yönetimler, 3, 23-51.
https://docplayer.biz.tr/5944922-Gecekondu-alanlarinda-kentsel-donusum-uygulamasina-bir-ornek-kucukcekmece-ayazma-tepeustu-kentsel-donusum-projesi.html

[22]   Spaans, M., Janssen-Jansen, L., & van der Veen, M. (2011). Market-Oriented Compensation Instruments: Lessons for Dutch Urban Redevelopment. TPR: Town Planning Review, 82, 425-440.
https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2011.25

[23]   Tekeli, I. (2001). Modernite Asilirken Kent Planlamasi. Ankara: Imge Kitabevi.

[24]   Wang, H., Tao, R., Wang, L., & Su, F. (2010). Farmland Preservation and Land Development Rights Trading in Zhejiang, China. Habitat International, 34, 454-463.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.12.004

[25]   http://www.refleksgazetesi.com/cukurova-daki-kentsel-donusum-jeoloji-muhendislerinin-kadrajinda/4888

[26]   http://yenibelediyeevleri.com/

 
 
Top