Back
 AiM  Vol.9 No.7 , July 2019
Multiple Chromosomes in Bacteria: Low Level of Evolutionary Constraint Drives the Rapid Genetic Divergence of Chromosome II
Abstract: Multiple chromosomes in bacteria are designated as a larger primary chromosome (CI) and smaller accessory chromosomes (CII and CIII). Although previous studies examined multiple chromosomes in several bacterial species, the evolutionary mechanisms for the origin of CIIs still remain unclear. In this study, the four following hypotheses were tested. 1) CIIs exhibit lower sequence conservation and sequence divergence compared to their corresponding CIs across species of Proteobacteria. 2) The differential sequence divergence of CI and CII depends on pathogenic and non-pathogenic life s. 3) CIIs harbor a higher level of horizontal gene transfers (HGTs) than CIs. 4) Orthologs located on CIIs experience less purifying selection than their corresponding orthologs on CIs. Results reveal a higher level of sequence conservation of CIs than the sequence conservation of CIIs. There is no significant difference in HGT estimates between CIs and CIIs. A majority of orthologous genes of CIs and CIIs experience purifying selection; however, genes on CIIs were significantly less constrained than the corresponding ones on CIs. This finding is true for both pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria, but the selective constraints for non-pathogenic bacteria are relatively less constrained. It was concluded that the differential selective constraint is a potent driving force for the rapid evolution of CII. Therefore, gene expression analysis at the transcriptome and proteome levels may shed light on the gene regulation mechanisms that might affect the sequence divergence between CI and CII.
Cite this paper: Trahan, C. , Pandey, R. , Singh, U. , Choudhary, A. , Cho, H. , Azad, R. and Choudhary, M. (2019) Multiple Chromosomes in Bacteria: Low Level of Evolutionary Constraint Drives the Rapid Genetic Divergence of Chromosome II. Advances in Microbiology, 9, 656-677. doi: 10.4236/aim.2019.97041.
References

[1]   Suwanto, A. and Kaplan, S. (1989) Physical and Genetic Mapping of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 Genome: Genome Size, Fragment Identification, and Gene Localization. Journal of Bacteriology, 171, 5840-5849.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.171.11.5840-5849.1989

[2]   Suwanto, A. and Kaplan, S. (1989) Physical and Genetic Mapping of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 Genome: Presence of Two Unique Circular Chromosomes. Journal of Bacteriology, 171, 5850-5859.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.171.11.5850-5859.1989

[3]   Michaux, S., Paillisson, J., Carles-Nurit, M.J., Bourg, G., Allardet-Servent, A. and Ramuz, M. (1993) Presence of Two Independent Chromosomes in the Brucella melitensis 16M Genome. Journal of Bacteriology, 175, 701-705.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.3.701-705.1993

[4]   Allardet-Servent, A., Michaux-Charachon, S., Jumas-Bilak, E., Karayan, L. and Ramuz, M. (1993) Presence of One Linear and One Circular Chromosome in the Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 Genome. Journal of Bacteriology, 175, 7869-7874.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.24.7869-7874.1993

[5]   Zuerner, R.L., Herrmann, J.L. and Girons, I.S. (1993) Comparison of Genetic Maps for Two Leptospira interrogans serovars Provides Evidence for Two Chromosomes and Intraspecies Heterogeneity. Journal of Bacteriology, 175, 5445-5451.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.17.5445-5451.1993

[6]   Winterstein, C. and Ludwig, B. (1998) Genes Coding for Respiratory Complexes Map on All Three Chromosomes of the Paracoccus denitrificans Genome. Archives of Microbiology, 169, 275-281.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002030050572

[7]   Trucksis, M., Michalski, J., Deng, Y.K. and Kaper, J.B. (1998) The Vibrio cholerae Genome Contains Two Unique Circular Chromosomes. PNAS, 95, 14464-14469.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.24.14464

[8]   Schuster, S.C. (2007) Next-Generation Sequencing Transforms Today’s Biology. Nature Methods, 5, 16-18.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1156

[9]   Mardis, E.R. (2008) The Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing Technology on Genetics. Trends in Genetics, 24, 142-149.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.12.007

[10]   Choudhary, M., Cho, H., Bavishi, A., Trahan, C. and Myagmarjav, B. (2012) Evolution of Multipartite Genomes in Prokaryotes. In: Pontarotti, P., Ed., Evolutionary Biology: Mechanisms and Trends, Springer, New York, 301-323.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30425-5_17

[11]   Choudhary, M., Zanhua, X., Fu, Y.X. and Kaplan, S. (2007) Genome Analyses of Three Strains of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Evidence of Rapid Evolution of Chromosome II. Journal of Bacteriology, 189, 1914-1921.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01498-06

[12]   Bavishi, A., Abhishek, A., Lin, L. and Choudhary, M. (2010) Complex Prokaryotic Genome Structure: Rapid Evolution of Chromosome II. Genome, 53, 675-687.
https://doi.org/10.1139/G10-046

[13]   Darling, A.C.E., Mau, B., Blattner, F.R. and Perna, N.T. (2004) Mauve: Multiple Alignment of Conserved Genomic Sequence with Rearrangements. Genome Research, 14, 1394-1403.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2289704

[14]   Langille, M.G. and Brinkman, F.S. (2009) Island Viewer: An Integrated Interface for Computational Identification and Visualization of Genomic Islands. Bioinformatics, 25, 664-665.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp030

[15]   Azad, R.K., Jani, M. and Mathee, K. (2016) Identification of Novel Genomic Islands in Liverpool Epidemic Strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Segmentation and Clustering. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1210.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01210

[16]   Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. and Lipman, D.J. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A New Generation of Protein Database Search Programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 3389-3402.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389

[17]   Zhou, Y. and Landweber, L.F. (2007) BLASTO: A Tool for Searching Orthologous Groups. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, W678-W682.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm278

[18]   Zhang, Z., Li, J., Zhao, X., Wang, J., Ka-ShuWong, G. and Yu, J. (2006) KaKs Calculator: Calculating Ka and Ks through Model Selection and Model Averaging. Genomics, Proteomics, & Bioinformatics, 4, 259-263.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-0229(07)60007-2

[19]   Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: Multiple Sequence Alignment with High Accuracy and High Throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 1792-1797.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340

[20]   Suyama, M., Torrents, D. and Bork, P. (2006) PAL2NAL: Robust Conversion of Protein Sequence Alignments into the Corresponding Codon Alignments. Nucleic Acids Research, 34, W609-W612.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl315

[21]   Jain, R., Rivera, M.C., Moore, J.E. and Lake, J.A. (2003) Horizontal Gene Transfer Accelerates Genome Innovation and Evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20, 1598-1602.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3801

[22]   Caro-Quintero, A. and Konstantinidis, K.T. (2014) Inter-Phylum HGT Has Shaped the Metabolism of Many Mesophilic and Anaerobic Bacteria. The ISME Journal, 9, 958-967.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.193

[23]   Price, M.N., Dehal, P.S. and Arkin, A.P. (2008) Horizontal Gene Transfer and the Evolution of Transcriptional Regulation in Escherichia coli. Genome Biology, 9, R4.
https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r4

[24]   Nei, M. (1988) Relative Roles of Mutation and Selection in the Maintenance of Genetic Variability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 319, 615-629.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1988.0069

[25]   Pál, C., Papp, B. and Lercher, M.J. (2006) An Integrated View of Protein Evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7, 337-348.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1838

[26]   Cooper, V.S., Vohr, S.H., Wrocklage, S.C. and Hatcher, P.J. (2010) Why Genes Evolve Faster on Secondary Chromosomes in Bacteria. PLOS Computational Biology, 6, e1000732.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000732

[27]   Robinson, M., Lilley, R., Little, S., Emtage, J.S., Yarranton, G., Stephens, P., Millican, A., Eaton, M. and Humphreys, G. (1984) Codon Usage Can Affect Efficiency of Translation of Genes in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Research, 12, 6663-6671.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/14.19.7737

 
 
Top