OJBIPHY  Vol.9 No.3 , July 2019
Evaluation of the Knowledge of CT Scan Prescribers on Patients’ Radioprotection in Senegal
Abstract: Medical imaging has enabled major improvements in the medical care of the patient. However, some of these tests have the disadvantage of using ionizing radiation at low doses. Although the CT scan is a powerful diagnostic tool, it remains a highly radiant imaging modality. In addition, the risk of radiation-induced cancer associated with low X-ray doses is established by the American Phase 2 study BEIR VII, and preventive measures require a good level of knowledge on radioprotection by imaging test prescribers. In our study, we evaluated the knowledge of CT scan prescribers in Senegal regarding patient radioprotection. These prescribers consisted of physicians and surgeons without distinction of specialty. Our objective was to have the required data for optimizing CT prescriptions in compliance with the principles of radioprotection. Our work focused on a descriptive analytical study of 107 doctors who prescribed CT scan in public health institutions in Senegal. Our results revealed poor knowledge of doctors prescribing CT scan on induced radio risks, even though the majority of them stated that they took those risks into account. Our data were not isolated, they were applicable to similar studies conducted outside Senegal. In summary, our study led on the one hand to recommendations on initial and continuing training and on the other hand on organizational and regulatory considerations.
Cite this paper: Badiane, S. , Sane, P. , Ndiaye, C. , Gueye, K. , Ndoye, O. , Amoussou-Guenou, K. and Mbodji, M. (2019) Evaluation of the Knowledge of CT Scan Prescribers on Patients’ Radioprotection in Senegal. Open Journal of Biophysics, 9, 204-217. doi: 10.4236/ojbiphy.2019.93015.

[1]   National Research Council, et al. (2006) Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. National Academies Press, Washington DC.

[2]   Gervaise, A., Esperabe-Vignau, F., Pernin, M., et al. (2011) Evaluation des connaissances des prescripteurs de scanner en matière de radioprotection des patients. Journal de Radiologie, 92, 681-687.

[3]   (2000) en ligne paris France. Société Française de Radiologie.

[4] en ligne Paris (France) (2012) Haute autorité de santé.

[5]   Azria, E., Bétrémieux, P., Caeymaex, L., et al. (2007) L’information dans le contexte du soin périnatal: Aspects éthiques. Archives de Pédiatrie, 14, 1231-1239.

[6]   Krille, L., Hammer, G.P., Merzenich, H. and Zeeb, H. (2010) Systematic Review on Physician’s Knowledge about Radiation Doses and Radiation Risks of Computed Tomography. European Journal of Radiology, 76, 36-41.

[7]   Wong, C.S., et al. (2012) A Questionnaire Study Assessing Local Physicians, Radiologists and Interns’ Knowledge and Practice Pertaining to Radiation Exposure Related to Radiological Imaging. European Journal of Radiology, 81, 264-268.

[8]   Lefebvre, G., Smeesters, P. and Van Bladel, L. (2006) Contrôle et évaluation de la radioprotection des patients en Belgique: Organisation, bilan et perspectives. Contrôle, 172, 12-16.

[9] en ligne Paris (France): Autorité de Sureté Nucléaire 2016.

[10]   Smeesters, P., Firket, H., Smeesters, P., Frühling, J., Smeesters, P., Behar, A., Vanderhaeghen, J.-J., et al. (2008) Radioprotection et pratique médicale: Progrès, défis et menaces. Bulletin et mémoires de l’Académie Royale de Médecine de Belgique, 163, 145-160.

[11]   la Rapport de la commission VROUSOS. Priorites en radioprotection en ligne Paris (France): La Documentation française 2004.