AM  Vol.10 No.7 , July 2019
Wrong Use of Averages Implies Wrong Results from Many Heuristic Models
Abstract: In a linear world, averages make perfect sense. Something too big is compensated by something too small. We show, however that the underlying differential equations (e.g. unlimited growth) rather than the equations themselves (e.g. exponential growth) need to be linear. Especially in finance and economics non-linear differential equations are used although the input parameters are average quantities (e.g. average spending). It leads to the sad conclusion that almost all results are at least doubtful. Within one model (diffusion model of marketing) we show that the error is tremendous. We also compare chaotic results to random ones. Though these data are hardly distinguishable, certain limits prove to be very different. Implications for finance can be important because e.g. stock prices vary generally, chaotically, though the evaluation assumes quite often randomness.
Cite this paper: Grabinski, M. and Klinkova, G. (2019) Wrong Use of Averages Implies Wrong Results from Many Heuristic Models. Applied Mathematics, 10, 605-618. doi: 10.4236/am.2019.107043.

[1]   Rose, T. (2017) The End of Average. Penguin Books, London.

[2]   Weiber, R. (1993) Chaos: Das Ende der klassischen Diffusionsmodellierung. Marketing ZFP, 1, 35-46.

[3]   Klinkova, G. (2018) The Effects of Chaos on Business Operations, PhD Thesis, Neu-Ulm.

[4]   Grabinski, M. (2004) Is There Chaos in Management or Just Chaotic Management? Complex Systems, Intelligence and Modern Technology Applications, Paris.

[5]   Appel, D. and Grabinski, M. (2011) The Origin of Financial Crisis: A Wrong Definition of Value, PJQM, 2, 33-51.

[6]   Klinkova, G. and Grabinski, M. (2017) Conservation Laws Derived from Systemic Approach and Symmetry. The International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance and Economic Sciences, 7, 1307-1312.

[7]   Bronshtein, I.N., Semenddyayev, K.A., Musiol, G. and Muehlig, H. (2007) Handbook of Mathematics. 5th English Edition, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.

[8]   Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973) The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal Political Economy, 81, 637-654.

[9]   Sato, R. and Ramaschandran, R.V. (2014) Symmetry and Economic Invariance. Springer, New York.

[10]   Appel, D., Dziergwa, K. and Grabinski, M. (2012) Momentum and Reversal: An Alternative Explanation by Non-Conserved Quantities. The International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance and Economic Sciences, 2, 8-16.

[11]   Saunders, E.M. (1993) Stock Prices and Wall Street Weather. American Economic Review, 83, 1337-1345.

[12]   Klinkova, G. and Grabinski, M. (2017) Due to Instability Gambling Is the Best Model FOR Most Financial Products. Archives of Business Research, 5, 255-261.

[13]   Klinkova, G. and Grabinski, M. (2012) Learning Curves with Two Frequencies for Analyzing All Kinds of Operations. Yasar University Publication, Bornova.

[14]   Schuster, H.G. (1984) Deterministic Chaos. Physik Verlag, Weinheim.

[15]   Filipe, J.A., Ferreira, M.A.M., Coelho, M. and Pedro, M.I. (2010) Chaos, Anti-Chaos and Resources: Dealing with Complexity. Aplimat-Journal of Applied Mathematics, 3, 83-90.

[16]   Ferreira, M.A.M., Filipe, J.A., Coelho, M. and Pedro, M.I. (2010) Chaos Effect in Fisheries Management. Journal of Economics and Engineering, 2, 36-43.

[17]   Filipe, J.A. and Ferreira, M.A.M. (2013) Social and Political Events and Chaos Theory—The “Drop of Honey Effect”. Emerging Issues in the Natural and Applied Sciences, 3, 126-137.

[18]   Grabinski, M. (2018) Calculations of Lyapunov Exponent and Hausdorff Dimension. (Unpublished)