AJIBM  Vol.9 No.6 , June 2019
Research on Retailer’s Dual Channel Multi-Product Bundle Sales Pricing
From the perspective of consumers, a monopolistic retailer is considered to sell two differentiated products in different sales modes: physical channel and online channel. In the case of separate sales, considering consumers’ channel and product preference, the same price of the same product is set in different channels to reduce channel conflicts caused by price differences among consumers. In the case of bundling, product bundling should be considered in network channels, and two products should be sold separately in physical channels. The analysis shows that the bundling strategy is better than the separate selling strategy. It can be seen from the numerical analysis that with the increase of the substitution degree of the bundled products, the demand and profit of the bundled sales strategy will gradually increase with the increase of the substitution degree. In addition, it is also found that the marginal cost of sales in the channel has a great impact on the two sales modes. Since the marginal cost of sales in the physical channel is greater than the marginal cost of sales in the network channel, it is only in the network channel that bundling is adopted, and the separate sales in the physical channel will enable the retailer to obtain more profits.
Cite this paper: Li, R. and Chen, H. (2019) Research on Retailer’s Dual Channel Multi-Product Bundle Sales Pricing. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9, 1506-1523. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2019.96100.

[1]   Guo, C. and Chen, G. (2009) Price Competition and Equilibrium Analysis of Dual Mixed Channel Distribution in Supply Chain. Chinese Management Science, 17, 65-71.

[2]   Xu, N. (2013) Double-Line Same Price: Redemption of Physical Retail. Sales and Marketing (Management Edition), No. 8, 83-85.

[3]   Zheng, W., Xu, L. and Li, B. (2014) Analysis of the Effect of Strong Retailers Opening up Network Channels under the Background of Online and Offline Prices. System Engineering, 32, 105-109.

[4]   Guo, L. (2012) Inequity Aversion and Fair Selling. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 77-89.

[5]   Tsay, A. and Agrawal, N. (2004) Channel Conflict and Coordination in the e-Commerce Age. Production and Operation Management, 13, 93-110.

[6]   Chen, G. and Xiang, C. (2016) Research on Pricing Strategy of Dual Channel Retailers under the Environment of “Internet +”. Price Theory and Practice, No. 5, 152-155.

[7]   Liu, H. (2016) Study on the Same-Price Strategy of Traditional Retailers’ Online and Offline Products—Taking Suning as an Example. China’s Circulation Economy, 30, 59-66.

[8]   Yuan, C., Yan, L. and Chai, G. (2014) The Oligarch Dual Channel Cournot Game Model—Also on Suning’s Dual Channel Same Price Strategy. Prediction, 33, 65-70.

[9]   Gaeth, G.J., Levin, I.P., Chakraborry, G. and Levin, A.M. (1991) Consumer Evaluations of Multi-Product Bundles: An Information Integration Analysis. Marketing Letters, 2, 47-57.

[10]   Adams, W.J. and Yellen, J.L. (1976) Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 475-498.

[11]   Eppen, G.D., Hanson, W.A. and Martin, R.K. (1991) Bundling New Products, New Markets, Low Risk. Sloan Management Review, 32, 14-26.

[12]   Pan, L. and Zhou, S. (2016) Multi-Product Supply Chain Pricing Strategy Considering Bundling. Operations and Management, 25, 11-17.

[13]   Yan, F., Sun, L. and Gao, Y. (2017) Bundle-Pricing Decision Model for Multiple Products. Procedia Computer Science, 112, 2147-2154.

[14]   Wang, H. (2018) Research on Retailer Bundling Strategy under Dual-Channel Supply Chain. Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin.