Back
 AJIBM  Vol.9 No.6 , June 2019
An Available-to-Promise Allocation Decision Model Based on Assemble-to-Order Supply Chain
Abstract:
The main content of this research is about the ATP (Available to promise) allocation problem based on Assemble-to-Order Supply Chain. In the case of Multiple-Suppliers, the synchronous planning method is selected to discuss the supply plan and demand plan and an ATP allocation decision model adapted to ATO supply chain production environment is established. Based on the equal-weight combination forecasting method, the forecast demand was input into the ATP distribution model. The mixed integer linear programming method was adopted to solve the calculation and analyze the cost and benefit. Finally, the optimal ATP distribution scheme was obtained.
Cite this paper: Xu, M. and Chen, H. (2019) An Available-to-Promise Allocation Decision Model Based on Assemble-to-Order Supply Chain. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9, 1475-1485. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2019.96097.
References

[1]   Zheng, D., Chen, H. and Huang, Y. (2013) Supply Chain Commitment Allocation Decision Model. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 3, 1-4.

[2]   Raghavan, N.R.S. and Dulluri, S. (2017) Revenue Management via Multi-Product Available to Promise. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 3, 457-479.
https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2007.3.457

[3]   Chen, J., Chen, H. and Ni, Y. (2014) Order Allocation Model Based on Flexible Combination Strategy. Industrial Engineering and Management, 16, 84-89.

[4]   Gao, L., Xu, S.H. and Ball, M.O. (2015) Managing an Available-to-Promise Assembly System with Dynamic Short-Term Pseudo-Order Forecast. Management Science, 58, 770-790.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1442

[5]   Ding, S. and Chen, H. (2015) Supply Chain Commitment Allocation Decision Based on Customer Classification. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 25, 334-338.

[6]   Jung, H. (2016) An Available-to-Promise Model Considering Customer Priority and Variance of Penalty Costs. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 49, 369-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2389-9

[7]   Gössinger, R.K. (2014) How to Increase Robustness of Capable-to-Promise. In: Lübbecke, M., Koster, A., Eds., Operations Research Proceedings 2014, Springer International Publishing, Berlin, 213-219.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28697-6_30

[8]   Zhang, J., Qin, W. and Wang, W. (2014) An Available-to-Promise Model for Periodical Order Promising. In: LISS 2014, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 167-171.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43871-8_26

[9]   Cheng, C.B. and Wu, M.T. (2014) Customer Order Fulfillment Based on a Rolling Horizon Available-to-Promise Mechanism: Solution by Fuzzy Approach and Genetic Algorithm. In: Filev, D., et al., Eds., Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 477-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11310-4_41

[10]   Lin J.T., Hong I.H., Wu C.H., et al. (2013) A Model for Batch Available-To-Promise in Order Fulfillment Processes for TFT-LCD Production Chains. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59, 720-729.

[11]   Alemany, M.M.E., Lario, F.C., Ortiz, A., et al. (2013) Available-to-Promise Modeling for Multi-Plant Manufacturing Characterized by Lack of Homogeneity in the Product: An Illustration of a Ceramic Case. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 3380-3398.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.022

[12]   Chen-Ritzo, C.H., Ervolina, T., Harrison, T.P., et al. (2014) Component Rationing for Available-to-Promise Scheduling in Configure-to-Order Systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 211, 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.006

[13]   Grillo, H., Alemany, M. and Ortiz, A. (2016) Modelling Pricing Policy Based on Shelf-Life of Non-Homogeneous Available-to-Promise in Fruit Supply Chains. In: Afsarmanesh, H., Camarinha-Matos, L. and Lucas-Soares, A., Eds., IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Springer, Cham, 608-617. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45390-3_52

[14]   Rabbani, M., Sadri, S., Manavizadeh, N., et al. (2015) A Novel Bi-Level Hierarchy towards Available-to-Promise in Mixed-Model Assembly Line Sequencing Problems. Engineering Optimization, 47, 947-962. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2014.933823

 
 
Top