Back
 AJIBM  Vol.9 No.6 , June 2019
Comparison and Validation of Distance on the Balanced Assignments of Group Having Entities with Multiple Attributes
Abstract:
In this paper, the balanced assignment is studied in classification of a group with multiple attribute into many subgroups without losing its similarity. The similarity or closeness in clustering is often measured as a distance. The Mahalanob distance is considered as one of the tools for measuring its closeness. The comparison between the distance criterion is shown by changing a specific assignment standard, and finally comparing it against the MTS method.
Cite this paper: Rhee, Y. (2019) Comparison and Validation of Distance on the Balanced Assignments of Group Having Entities with Multiple Attributes. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9, 1464-1474. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2019.96096.
References

[1]   Rhee, Y. (2018) A Study on the Balanced Assignment of Allocating Large Group with Multiple Attributes into Subgroups. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 8, 1418-1432.

[2]   Barron, H. and Schmidt, C. (1988) Sensitivity Analysis of Additive Multi-Attributes Value Models. Operations Research, 36, 122-127. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.36.1.122

[3]   Taguchi, G., Chowdhury, S. and Wu, Y. (2000) The Mahalanobis-Taguchi System. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken.

[4]   Taguchi, G. and Jugulum, R. (2002) The Mahalanobis-Taguchi Strategy: A Pattern Technology System. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172247

[5]   Kim, H. (2010) A Study of Clustering Analysis to Guarantee the Equality of Attributes among Small Group. Master Thesis, Keimyung University, Daegu.

[6]   Louise, G. and Menger, K. (1990) Taxicap Geometry. Mathematics, 63, 213-232.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2690903

[7]   Anton, H. (1994) Elementary Linear Algebra. 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 170-171.

[8]   De Maesschalck, R., Jouan-Rimbaud, D. and Massart, D.L. (2000) The Mahalanobis Distance. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 50, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(99)00047-7

[9]   Su, C.T. and Li, T.S. (2002) Neural and MTS Algorithms for Feature Selection. The Asian Journal on Quality, 3, 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/15982688200200023

[10]   Woodall, M., et al. (2003) A Review and Analysis of the Mahalanobis Taguchi System. Technometrics, 45, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017002188618626

 
 
Top