Theoretical Observations on Power in Complex Organizations

Federico de  Andreis; Massimiliano  Carioni

doi:10.4236/ajibm.2019.96093

Federico de Andreis, Massimiliano Carioni

Abstract:

Power is the ability to make things happen according to one’s perspective by getting someone else to do something. In organizations, there are various sources of power. However, the primary source of power is the legitimate power, which means the power assigned based on job designation. Organizations are made up of individuals that exercise greater or lesser degrees of power. Sometimes, authority stems from a person’s title in the organization, or from specialized knowledge and expertise. Others may exercise power through interpersonal relationships or the force of their personality. And still, others gain influence through an ability to grant access to important resources. This research will examine the structure of complex organizations with a focus on power management and power relations that can be created within the organizations themselves. It presents some observations of how the distribution and exercise of power in complex organizations varies systematically as a function of environment, organizational form, and personal characteristics of organizational members. This analysis, therefore, will define the power strategies, in order to understand the basis of the power, deepening how the power could be managed by leaders.

Keywords: Power, Leadership, Authority, Power Outcomes, Organizational Productivity

Cite this paper: Andreis, F. and Carioni, M. (2019) Theoretical Observations on Power in Complex Organizations. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9, 1423-1430. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2019.96093.

References

[1] Weber, M. (1978) Basic Sociological Terms. Economy and Society. In: Roth, G. and Wittich, C., Eds., Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 3-62.

[2] Abernethy, M.A. and Vagnoni, E. (2003) Power, Organization Design and Managerial Behaviour. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 207-225.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00049-7

[3] Whimster, S. (2007) Understanding Weber. Routledge, London, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203030561

[4] Holton, R. and Turner, B.S. (1989) Max Weber on Economy and Society. Routledge, London, 10-21.

[5] Guzzini, S. (2017) Max Weber’s Power. In: Lebow, R.N., Ed., Max Weber and International Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 97-118.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108236461.005

[6] Kalberg, S. (1980) Max Weber’s Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes in History. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1145-1179.
https://doi.org/10.1086/227128

[7] Nelson, G.M. (2017) Mary Parker Follett-Creativity and Democracy. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41, 178-185.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1263073

[8] Berman, S.L. and Van Buren, H.J. (2015) Mary Parker Follett, Managerial Responsibility, and the Future of Capitalism. Futures, 68, 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.013

[9] Cocozza, A. (2005) Direzione risorse umane. Politiche e strumenti per l’organizzazione e la gestione delle relazioni di lavoro, Franco Angeli, Milan.

[10] Fiedler, F.E. (1964) A Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 149-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60051-9

[11] Hersey, P., Blancahrd, K.H. and Natemeyer, W.E. (1979) Situational Leadership, Perception, and the Impact of Power. Group & Organization Management, 4, 418-428.
https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117900400404

[12] De Andreis, F. and Petruzzo, S. (2017) Environment and Conflict Management for Research and Development Support. European Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 2, 101-107. https://doi.org/10.20534/EJEMS-17-2-101-107

[13] Vroom, V. and Yetton, P. (1973) Leadership and Decision-Making. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wrc8r