JMP  Vol.10 No.6 , May 2019
Interval Based Analysis of Bell’s Theorem
Abstract: This paper introduces the concept and motivates the use of finite-interval based measures for physically realizable and measurable quantities, which we call D-measures. We demonstrate the utility and power of D-measures by illustrating their use in an interval-based analysis of a prototypical Bell’s inequality in the measurement of the polarization states of an entangled pair of photons. We show that the use of finite intervals in place of real-numbered values in the Bell inequality leads to reduced violations. We demonstrate that, under some conditions, an interval-based but otherwise classically calculated probability measure can be made to arbitrarily closely approximate its quantal counterpart. More generally, we claim by heuristic arguments and by formal analogy with finite-state machines that  D-measures can provide a more accurate model of both classical and quantal physical property values than point-like, real numbers—as originally proposed by Tuero Sunaga in 1958.
Cite this paper: Eblen, F. and Barghouty, A. (2019) Interval Based Analysis of Bell’s Theorem. Journal of Modern Physics, 10, 585-600. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2019.106041.

[1]   Gisin, N. (2018) Why Bohmian Mechanics? One- and Two-Time Position Measurements, Bell Inequalities, Philosophy, and Physics. Entropy, 20, 105.

[2]   Schlosshauer, M. (2014) The Quantum-to-Classical Transition and Decoherence.

[3]   Shannon, C.E. (1948) A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.

[4]   Bekenstein, J.D. (1981) A Universal Upper Bound on the Entropy to Energy Ratio for Bounded Systems. Physical Review D, 23, 287.

[5]   Sunoj, S.M., Sankara, P.G. and Maya, S.S. (2009) Characterization of Life Distributions Using Conditional Expectations of Doubly (Interval) Truncated Random Variables. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 38, 1441-1452.

[6]   Misagh, F. and Yari, G. (2012) Interval Entropy and Informative Distance. Entropy, 14, 480-490.

[7]   Warmus, M. (1956) Calculus of Approximations. Bulletin de l’Academie Polonaise de Sciences, 4, 253-257.

[8]   Sunaga, T. (2009, Original Publication 1958) Theory of an Interval Algebra and Its Application to Numerical Analysis. Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 26, 125-143.

[9]   Moore, R.E. (1966) Interval Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs.

[10]   Kulisch, U. (1969) Grundzüge der Intervallrechnung. in Jahrbuch überblicke Mathematik 2. Bibliographisches Institute, Mannheim.

[11]   Markov, S. and Okumura, K. (1999) The Contribution of T. Sunaga to Interval Analysis and Reliable Computing. In: Csendes, T., Ed., Developments in Reliable Computing, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 163.

[12]   Alefeld, G. and Mayer, G. (2000) Interval Analysis: Theory and Applications. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 121, 421-464.

[13]   Moore, R.E., Kearfoot, R.B. and Cloud, M.J. (2009) Introduction to Interval Analysis. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.

[14]   Markov, S. (2016) On the Algebra of Intervals. Reliable Computing, 21, 80-108.

[15]   Koshelva, O. and Kreinovich, V. (2016) Towards an Algebraic Description of Set Arithmetic. Technical Report UTEP-CS-16-90, University of Texas, El Paso.

[16]   Kaucher, E. (1980) Interval Analysis in the Extended Interval Space IR. In: Alefeld, G. and Grigorieff, R.D., Eds., Fundamentals of Numerical Computation (Computer-Oriented Numerical Analysis), Computing Supplementum Vol. 2, Springer, Berlin, 33.

[17]   Bell, J.S. (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics, 1, 195-200.

[18]   Piaget, A. and Landowski, M. (2012) Is the Coventional Interval Arithmetic Correct? Journal of Theoretical and Applied Computer Science, 6, 27-44.

[19]   Clauser, J., Horne, M., Shimony, A. and Holt, R. (1969) Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories. Physical Review Letters, 23, 880-884.

[20]   Aspect, A., Grangier, G. and Roger, G. (1982) Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell’s Inequalities. Physical Review Letters, 49, 91-94.

[21]   Bell, J.S. (1966) On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 447-452.

[22]   Bohm, D. (1952) A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden Variables” Parts I and II. Physical Review, 85, 166-193.

[23]   Mermin, N.D. (1993) Hidden Variables and the Two Theories of John Bell. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65, 803-815.

[24]   Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935) Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47, 77-80.

[25]   Mattuck, R.D. (1981) Non-Locality in Bohm-Bub’s Hidden Variable Theory of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physics Letters A, 81, 331-332.

[26]   de Muynck, W.M. (1986) The Bell Inequalities and Their Irrelevance to the Problem of Locality in Quantum Mechanics. Physics Letters A, 114, 65-67.

[27]   Zukowski, M. and Brukner, C. (2014) Quantum Non-Locality. Journal of Physics A, 47, Article ID: 424009.

[28]   Aharonov, Y., Botero, A. and Scully, M. (2014) Locality or Non-Locality in Quantum Mechanics: Hidden Variables without “Spooky Action-at-a-Distance”. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, 56, 5-15.

[29]   Dehlinger, D. and Mitchell, M.W. (2002) Entangled Photons, Nonlocality, and Bell Inequalities in the Undergraduate Laboratory. American Journal of Physics, 70, 903-910.

[30]   Maccone, L. (2013) A Simple Proof of Bell’s Inequality. American Journal of Physics, 81, 854-859.