AJIBM  Vol.9 No.4 , April 2019
Research on Technology Spillover’s Bridge Effect between Bidirectional FDI and GVC Position—A Case of Chinese Manufacturing Industry
Focusing on technology spillover’s bridge effect between bidirectional Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Global Value Chain (GVC) position of manufacturing industry, this paper first analyzes theoretical mechanism of bidirectional FDI’s influence on GVC position, by taking into account technology spillover perspective, and then it verifies the theoretical framework by using 15 Chinese manufacturing sub-industries data in the latest ten years. The Generalized Least Squares regression results prove that technology spillover plays as a core channel of both Inward FDI’s and Outward FDI’s GVC position promotion effect, and the interactive development of bidirectional FDI can further significantly enhance this bridge effect.
Cite this paper: Yu, P. and Peng, G. (2019) Research on Technology Spillover’s Bridge Effect between Bidirectional FDI and GVC Position—A Case of Chinese Manufacturing Industry. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9, 845-853. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2019.94057.

[1]   Blomstrom, M. and Kokko, A. (1998) Multinational Corporations and Spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, 247-277.

[2]   Ge, S.Q. and Luo, W. (2015) Multinational Enterprises Entry and Industrial Structural of Manufacturing Sector in China: Based on Global Value Chain Perspective. Economic Research Journal, 11, 34-48.

[3]   Brach, J. and Kappel, R. (2009) Global Value Chains, Technology Transfer and Local Firm Upgrading in non-OECD Countries. GIGA Working Papers.

[4]   Yang, L.X. and Luo, Y.H. (2017) Outward Foreign Direct Investment and Global Value Chain Upgrading Effect. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 34, 54-70.

[5]   Humphrey, J. (2004) Upgrading in Global Value Chains. Social Science Electronic Publishing.

[6]   Yao, S.J., Wang, P., Zhang, J. and Ou, J.H. (2016) Dynamic Relationship between China’s Inward and Outward Foreign Direct Investments. China Economic Review, 40, 54-70.

[7]   Wang, S.Q. and Wang, S.L. (2017) Productivity Effects of Bidirectional FDI in Manufacturing Industry: Industry Differences and Estimation of Human Capital Threshold. Economic Review, 2, 102-114.

[8]   Li, L., Liu, B. and Wang, X.X. (2017) Spillover Effect of Foreign Investment and Global Value Chain Participation of China. World Economy Studies, 4, 43-58.

[9]   Li, Y. and Li, P. (2018) A Study on Heterogeneity Impacts of FDI on China Industries’ Value Chain Upgrading. World Economy Studies, 5, 37-50.

[10]   Zhang, H. and Wang, J. (2013) China’s Foreign Direct Investment and Global Value Chain Upgrade. China Renmin University Press, Beijing.

[11]   Li, H.B. and Wen, L. (2016) Does Two-Way Investment in Service Industry Improve Chinese Enterprises’ Innovation Competence? International Economics and Trade Research, 32, 18-33.

[12]   Wang, J.Y. and Blomstrom, M. (1992) Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer: A Simple Model. European Economic Review, 36, 137-155.

[13]   Koopman, R., Powers, W., Wang, Z. and Wei, S.J. (2010) Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains. National Bureau of Economic Research.

[14]   Liu, H.Y. and Nie, F. (2015) Study on the Manufacturing Industrial Hollowing-Out Effect of China’s OFDI. China Industrial Economics, 4, 83-96.

[15]   Huang, L.Y., Liu, D.D. and Xie, H.Q. (2018) Research on the Harmonious Development of Outward Foreign Direct Investment and Inward Foreign Direct Investment. China Industrial Economics, 3, 80-97.

[16]   Li, P., Jiang, Q. and Lin, Y. (2018) FDI and “Trap of International Division of Labor”—Based on View of GVC Embeddedness in Developing Host Countries. Journal of International Trade, 6, 119-132.

[17]   Li, F. (2015) The Status of International Division of Labor under Global Value Chain: An Analysis Based on Added Value. International Economics and Trade Research, 31, 31-42.

[18]   Wang, Y.Y. and Lin, H.C. (2015) Effects of Global Value Chain Embeddedness on Industrial Transformation and Upgrading: An Empirical Study on China’s Industrial Panel Data. Journal of International Trade, 11, 51-61.