Back
 AJIBM  Vol.9 No.2 , February 2019
Evolution Analysis of Synthetic Biotechnology from the Perspective of Multiple Knowledge Network
Abstract: Science and technology that function as knowledge resources have shown a complex relation in the process of innovation, especially in the synthetic biotechnology industry, an industry bridging biology and engineering where its standardized, decoupled and modularized innovation mode has reconstructed rather than simply spanned the institutions of academic and industrial worlds. Multiple knowledge networks open a new avenue for studying the evolution of synthetic biotechnology. This paper first proposes a framework of integrating scientific and technological knowledge networks, then utilizes WOS’s Cross Search function to construct the cross-reference between DII and SCI and SSCI, finally employs the indicators of network structures and nodes to analyze the multiple knowledge networks in the evolution of synthetic biotechnology. Results show that at the emergence stage (2000-2003), scientific and technological knowledge are difficult to integrate with each other; at the exploration stage (2004-2007), there exist significant intersection and symbiosis between scientific and technological knowledge; and at the growth stage (2008-2014), scientific and technological knowledge give rise to independent logics of growth.
Cite this paper: Liu, R. (2019) Evolution Analysis of Synthetic Biotechnology from the Perspective of Multiple Knowledge Network. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9, 366-384. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2019.92025.
References

[1]   Cameron, D.E., Bashor, C.J. and Collins, J.J. (2014) A Brief History of Synthetic Biology. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 12, 381-390.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3239

[2]   Si, T. and Zhao, H. (2016) A Brief Overview of Synthetic Biology Research Programs and Roadmap Studies in the United States. Synthetic & Systems Biotechnology, 1, 258-264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2016.08.003

[3]   Clarke, L.J. and Kitney, R.I. (2016) Synthetic Biology in the UK—An Outline of Plans and Progress. Synthetic & Systems Biotechnology, 1, 243-257.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2016.09.003

[4]   Shapira, P., Kwon, S. and Youtie, J. (2017) Tracking the Emergence of Synthetic Biology. Scientometrics, 112, 1439-1469.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2452-5

[5]   Endy, D. (2005) Foundations for Engineering Biology. Nature, 438, 449-453.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04342

[6]   Phelps, C., Heidl, R. and Wadhwa, A. (2012) Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 1115-1166.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311432640

[7]   Brennecke, J. and Rank, O.N. (2017) The Firm’s Knowledge Network and the Transfer of Advice among Corporate Inventors. Research Policy, 46, 768-783.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.002

[8]   Guan, J. and Liu, N. (2015) Exploitative and Exploratory Innovations in Knowledge Network and Collaboration Network: A Patent Analysis in the Technological Field of Nano-Energy. Research Policy, 45, 97-112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.08.002

[9]   Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2013) Discipline Building in Synthetic Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 122-129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.03.007

[10]   Ahuja, G., Soda, G. and Zaheer, A. (2012) The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks. Organization Science, 23, 434–448.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0695

[11]   Cannella, A.A. and McFadyen, M.A. (2016) Changing the Exchange: The Dynamics of Knowledge Worker Ego Networks. Journal of Management, 42, 1005-1029.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313511114

[12]   Demirkan, I., Deeds, D.L. and Demirkan, S. (2013) Exploring the Role of Network Characteristics, Knowledge Quality, and Inertia on the Evolution of Scientific Networks. Journal of Management, 39, 1462-1489.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312453739

[13]   Guan, J., Zhang, J. and Yan, Y. (2015) The Impact of Multilevel Networks on Innovation. Research Policy, 44, 545-559.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.007

[14]   Schiffauerova, A. and Beaudry, C. (2012) Collaboration Spaces in Canadian Biotechnology: A Search for Gatekeepers. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, 29, 281-306.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.004

[15]   Yayavaram, S. and Ahuja, G. (2008) Decomposability in Knowledge Structures and Its Impact on the Usefulness of Inventions and Knowledge-Base Malleability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 333-362.
https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.2.333

[16]   Yan, Y. and Guan, J. (2018) How Multiple Networks Help in Creating Knowledge: Evidence from Alternative Energy Patents. Scientometrics, No. 4, 1-27.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2638-5

[17]   Chen, Z. and Guan, J. (2015) The Core-Peripheral Structure of International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citation Data. R & D Management, 46, 62–79.
https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12119

[18]   Guan, J., Yan, Y. and Zhang, J.J. (2017) The Impact of Collaboration and Knowledge Networks on Citations. Journal of Informetrics, 11, 407-422.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.007

[19]   Fan, X., Liu, W. and Zhu, G. (2017) Scientific Linkage and Technological Innovation Capabilities: International Comparisons of Patenting in the Solar Energy Industry. Scientometrics, 111, 117-138.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2274-5

[20]   Wu, C.Y. and Mathews, J.A. (2012) Knowledge Flows in the Solar Photovoltaic Industry: Insights from Patenting by Taiwan, Korea and China. Research Policy, 41, 524-540.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.007

[21]   No, H.J., An, Y. and Park, Y. (2015) A Structured Approach to Explore Knowledge Flows through Technology-Based Business Methods by Integrating Patent Citation Analysis and Text Mining. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 97, 181-192.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.007

 
 
Top