Back
 JWARP  Vol.11 No.2 , February 2019
Evaluation and Impact of a Polluted Stream on the Integrated Management of a Drinking Water Resource: A Case Study of the Middle Vaal River, South Africa
Abstract: The Koekemoerspruit is a possible pollution source of the Middle Vaal River, an important drinking water source in South Africa. This case study aimed to establish the water quality of the Koekemoerspruit, to evaluate the impact of the Koekemoerspruit on the Vaal River, and to use this information to identify shortcomings in the monitoring program. Monthly and weekly samples from both the Vaal River and the Koekemoerspruit were analyzed at an accredited testing laboratory based on ISO 17025 for 20 chemical methods. A dataset from 2002 to 2015 was statistically analyzed by means of Statistica software, the Mann-Kendall test and the Sens’s slope to determine descriptive statistics and significant trends respectively. The sites’ water quality was evaluated by comparison with both national drinking water standards and environmental target water quality objectives. Results indicated that the target water quality objectives for orthophosphate, nitrate and nitrite, and ammonia concentrations were considerably exceeded in the Koekemoerspruit. The drinking water quality of the Koekemoerspruit and the Middle Vaal was noncompliant with South African standards. Color, electrical conductivity, turbidity, sulfate, recoverable cyanide and arsenic at one site posed aesthetic, operational, acute and chronic health risks. Color, mean ammonia and total chlorophyll concentrations displayed significant trends of increase over time and increased drastically after 2012 at the site where water enters the Middle Vaal River. However, the Koekemoerspruit did not seem to have a significant impact on the overall water quality of the Middle Vaal River, except for total chlorophyll concentrations. Moreover, the review and recommendations for optimizing the water quality monitoring program proved that original monitoring objectives have been achieved. The reviewed monitoring program has consequently been adopted in the water safety plan to address the shortcomings that were identified during this case study.
Cite this paper: Rensburg, S. and Barnard, S. (2019) Evaluation and Impact of a Polluted Stream on the Integrated Management of a Drinking Water Resource: A Case Study of the Middle Vaal River, South Africa. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 11, 148-165. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2019.112009.
References

[1]   Bartram, J. and Ballance, R. (1996) Water Quality Monitoring: A Practical Guide to the Design and Implementation of Freshwater Quality Studies and Monitoring Programmes. Taylor & Francis, London and New York, 383 p.

[2]   Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2015) Guidance Manual for optimizing Water Quality Monitoring Programme Design, PN.

[3]   Claassen, M. (2013) Integrated Water Resource Management in South Africa. International Journal of Water Governance, 1, 323-338.
https://doi.org/10.7564/13-IJWG12

[4]   Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) (1997) Water Services Act (Act No. 108 of 1997): Regulations Relating to the Compulsory National Standards and Measures to Conserve Water, as published by Government Notice No. 509 (Government Gazette No. 22355) of 8 June 2001.

[5]   Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) (2016) Government Gazette 39943 No. 469, Classes and Resource Quality Objectives for the Middle Vaal Catchment, 22 April 2016.

[6]   Eldridge, S.L.C., Wherry, S.A. and Wood, T.M. (2014) Statistical Analysis of the Water-Quality Monitoring Programme, Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, and Optimization of the Programme for 2013 and Beyond, U.S. Geological Survey.
https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141009

[7]   Hallett, C. S., Valesini, F., Scanes, P., Crawford, C., Gillanders, B.M., Pope, A., Udy, J., Fortune, J., Townsend, S., Barton, J., Ye, Q., Ross, D.J., Martin, K., Glasby, T. and Maxwell, P. (2016) A Review of Australian Approaches for Monitoring, Assessing and Reporting Estuarine Condition: II. State and Territory Programmes. Environmental Science & Policy, 66, 270-281.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.013

[8]   Housing Development Agency (HAD) (2015) City of Matlosana—North West, Housing Market Overview, Human Settlements Mining Town Intervention, 2008-2013.
http://thehda.co.za/pdf/uploads/multimedia/City_of_Motlosana___Nort_West.pdf

[9]   Igbinosa, E.O. and Okho, A.I. (2009) Impact of Discharge Wastewater Effluents on the Physico-Chemical Qualities of a Receiving Watershed in a Typical Rural Community. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 6, 175-182.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327619

[10]   Janse van Rensburg, S., Barnard, S. and Krüger, M. (2016) Challenges in the Potable Water Industry Due to Changes in Source Water Quality: Case Study of Midvaal Water Company, South Africa. Water SA, 42, 633-640.
https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v42i4.14

[11]   Lovett, G.M., Burns, D.A., Driscoll, C.T., Jenkins, J.C., Mitchell, M.J., Rustad, L., Shanley, J.B., Likens, G.E. and Haeube, R. (2007) Who Needs Environmental Monitoring? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 253-260.
https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[253:WNEM]2.0.CO;2

[12]   Mema, V. (2010) Impact of Poorly Maintained Wastewater Sewage Treatment Plants—Lessons From South Africa Wastewater Management. ReSource, 12, 60-65

[13]   Rivett, U., Champanis, M. and Wilson-Jones, T. (2013) Monitoring Drinking Water Quality in South Africa: Designing Information Systems for Local Needs. Water SA, 39, 409-414.
https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v39i3.10

[14]   Salmi, T., Määttä, A., Anttila, P., Ruoho-Airola, T. and Amnell, T. (2002) Detecting Trends of Annual Values of Atmospheric Pollutants by the Mann-Kendall Test and Sen’s Slope Estimates—The Excel Template Application MAKESENS. Finnish Meteorological Institute, Publications on Air Quality No. 31 Report code FMI-AQ-31.

[15]   South African National Accreditation System (SANAS) (2017).
https://www.sanas.co.za/schedules/testing/T0132-05-2018.pdf

[16]   South African National Standard (SANS). 241-1: 2015 Drinking Water, Part 1: Microbiological, Physical, Aesthetic and Chemical Determinants. 241-2: 2015 Drinking Water, Part 2: Application of SANS 241-1.

[17]   Swanepoel, A., Du Preez, H., Schoeman, C., Janse van Vuuren, S. and Sundrama, A. (2008) Condensed Laboratory Methods for Monitoring Phytoplankton, Including Cyanobacteria, in South African Freshwaters. Water Research Commission Report No.TT 323/08. South African Water Research Commission, Pretoria.

[18]   United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2009) IWRM Guidelines at River Basin Level. Part 1: Principles.
https://en.unesco.org/themes/water-security/hydrology/programmes/iwrm/resources

 
 
Top