Back
 ENG  Vol.11 No.1 , January 2019
Automotive Aerodynamics Analysis Using Two Commonly Used Commercial Software
Abstract: Aerodynamics analysis has become a mindset for high performance vehicles. This is because it provides valuable insight on a vehicle motion during different phases. There are vast varieties of software available like ANSYS Workbench, Star CCM+, Autodesk Simulation, SimFlow, FeatFlow, Autodesk Inventor etc. Amongst these softwares, Star CCM+ and ANSYS Workbench are the most widely used. Normally, it is observed that considerable users are confused in choosing the right software for CFD simulation because of a large variety of commercially available softwares. The present study provides comparative results to users of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) with the driven case study. In the present case, authors chose the most commonly used CFD softwares, the ANSYS Workbench Fluent and the Star CCM+. Polyhedral meshing was applied on computer aided model of a car in both of these softwares. It has been found that coefficients of drag and lift achieved by aerodynamic analysis of a car are in a small marginal approximation between both ANSYS Workbench Fluent and Star CCM+ softwares. In the case of Star CCM+, CD was around 0.261 and CL was 0.07; however, in the case of ANSYS Workbench Fluent approximations were found to be 0.271 for CD and 0.05 for CL.
Cite this paper: Loya, A. , Iqbal, A. , Nasir, M. , Ali, H. , Khan, M. and Imran, M. (2019) Automotive Aerodynamics Analysis Using Two Commonly Used Commercial Software. Engineering, 11, 22-32. doi: 10.4236/eng.2019.111003.
References

[1]   Smith, C. (1978) Tune to Win. Aero Publishers, Fallbrook.

[2]   Hucho, W.-H. (2013) Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles: From Fluid Mechanics to Vehicle Engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

[3]   Katz, J. and Bentley, R. (2006) Aerodynamics of Race Cars. Annual View of Fluid Mechanics, 38, 27-63.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092016

[4]   Sudin, M.N., Abdullah, M.A., Ramli, F.R., Musthafah, M.T. and Shamsudin, S.A. (2014) Review of Research on Vehicles Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Methods. International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 14, 35-47.

[5]   O’Rourke, B. (1990) The Uses of Composite Materials in the Design and Manufacture of Formula 1 Racing Cars. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 204, 41-48.
https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1990_204_131_02

[6]   Howell, J. and Le Good, G. (1999) The Influence of Aerodynamic Lift on High Speed Stability. SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191.

[7]   Mason, W.H., Knill, D.L., Giunta, A.A., Grossman, B., Watson, L.T. and Haftka, R.T. (1998) Getting the Full Benefits of CFD in Conceptual Design. 16th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Albuquerque, NM, 15-18 June 1998, 2513.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-2513

[8]   Barnes, D.I. (2015) Understanding Pulverised Coal Biomass and Waste Combustion—A Brief Overview. Applied Thermal Engineering, 74, 89-95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.01.057

[9]   Anderson Jr., J.D. (2010) Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. 5th Edition, Chapter # 02, Momentum Equation, 127.

[10]   Menter, F.R. (1994) Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications. AIAA Journal, 32, 1598-1605.
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149

[11]   Motors, G. (1979) More Efficient Big Cars. Hearst Magazines, 152.

[12]   Marklund, J. (2013) Under-Body and Diffuser Flows of Passenger Vehicles. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.

 
 
Top