AJIBM  Vol.9 No.1 , January 2019
Stakeholders’ Pressure and CSR Engagement. A Case in the Apparel Sector
Abstract: This paper, drawing on stakeholder and legitimacy theory, addresses the issue of stakeholders’ pressure effect on a firm’s CSR behavior. It focuses on the apparel sector as these companies, characterized by consumer proximity, are under the lens of stakeholders for their direct social performance as well as for their suppliers’ actions. We analyze the Nike case in order to study how stakeholders’ pressure shapes a firm’s engagement in CSR issues. Our study points out the dynamic nature of stakeholders and legitimacy, and it underlines the influence of two actors which are rarely considered as primary and most important stakeholders, namely media and social activist groups.
Cite this paper: Lucchini, A. and Moisello, A. (2019) Stakeholders’ Pressure and CSR Engagement. A Case in the Apparel Sector. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9, 169-190. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2019.91012.

[1]   Buchholtz, A.K. and Carroll, A.B. (2012) Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. CENGAGE Learning., Canada.

[2]   Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975) Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behaviour. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122-136.

[3]   Pomering, A. and Dolnicar, S. (2009) Assessing the Prerequisite of Successful CSR Implementation: Are Consumers Aware of CSR Initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 285-301.

[4]   Brown, T.J. and Dacin, P.A. (1997) The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. The Journal of Marketing, 61, 68-84.

[5]   Morsing, M. and Schultz, M. (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 323-338.

[6]   Times (2018).

[7]   New York Times (2018).

[8]   Fastcompany (2018).

[9]   Quartz (2018).

[10]   Maquila Solidarity Network (2018).

[11]   Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.

[12]   Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997) Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.

[13]   Deegan, C. (2002) Introduction: The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures—A Theoretical Foundation. Accounting. Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15, 282-311.

[14]   Haniffa, R.M. and Cooke, T.E. (2005) The Impact of Culture and Governance on Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 391-430.

[15]   Ellerup Nielsen, A. and Thomsen, C. (2007) Reporting CSR—What and How to Say It? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12, 25-40.

[16]   Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995) Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: A Review of the Literature and a Longitudinal Study of UK Disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8, 47-77.

[17]   Suchman, M. (1995) Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.

[18]   Clarkson, M.E. (1995) A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.

[19]   Wood, D.J. (1991) Corporate Social Performance Revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.

[20]   Palazzo, G. and Scherer, A.G. (2006) Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71-88.

[21]   Ashforth, B.E. and Gibbs, B.W. (1990) The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177-194.

[22]   Husted, B.W. (1998) Organizational Justice and the Management of Stakeholder Relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 643-651.

[23]   Branco, M.C. and Lima Rodrigues, L. (2006) Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility by Portuguese Banks: A Legitimacy Theory Perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11, 232-248.

[24]   De Villiers, C. and Van Staden, C.J. (2006) Can Less Environmental Disclosure Have a Legitimising Effect? Evidence from Africa. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 763-781.

[25]   Brown, N. and Deegan, C. (1998) The Public Disclosure of Environmental Performance Information—A Dual Test of Media Agenda Setting Theory and Legitimacy Theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29, 21-41.

[26]   Sethi, S. (1975) Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework. California Management Review, 17, 58-64.

[27]   Oliver, C. (1991) Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.

[28]   Lindblom, C.K. (1994) The Implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York.

[29]   Gavana, G., Gottardo, P. And Moisello, A.M. (2017) Sustainability Reporting in Family Firms: A Panel Data Analysis. Sustainability, 9, 38.

[30]   Barkemeyer, R. (2007) Legitimacy as a Key Driver and Determinant of CSR in Developing Countries. The 2007 Marie Curie Summer School on Earth System Governance, Amsterdam, 24 May-6 June 2007.

[31]   Belkaoui, A. and Karpik, P.G. (1989) Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2, 26-31.

[32]   Branco, M.C. and Rodrigues, L.L. (2008) Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 685-701.

[33]   Cowen, S.S., Ferreri, L.B. and Parker, L.D. (1987) The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Typology and Frequency-Based Analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 111-122.

[34]   Hackston, D. and Milne, M.J. (1996) Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9, 77-108.

[35]   Patten, D.M. (1991) Exposure, Legitimacy, and Social Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10, 297-308.

[36]   Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K. and Verbeeten, F. (2011) Determinants of Voluntary CSR Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5, 233-262.

[37]   Lucchini, A. and Moisello, A.M. (2017) CSR Disclosure, Visibility and Media Pressure International Evidence from the Apparel and Textile Industry. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 93, 5-28.

[38]   Rowley, T.J. (1997) Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887-910.

[39]   Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Vol. 8, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[40]   Freeman, L.C. (1978) Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.

[41]   Frisch, A. (2008) Built for Success: The Story of Nike. Creative Education, Minnesota, 5-14.

[42]   Locke, R.M. (2003) The Promise and Perils of Globalization: The Case of Nike. Management: Inventing and Delivering Its Future, 39, 40.

[43]   Connor, T. Still Waiting for Nike to Do It: Nike’s Labour Practices in the Three Years since CEO Phil Knight’s Speech to the National Press Club.

[44]   Boje, D.M. and Khan, F.R. (2009) Story-Branding by Empire Entrepreneurs: Nike, Child Labor, and Pakistan’s Soccer Ball Industry. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 22, 9-24.

[45]   Rosenzweig, P.M. (1994) International Sourcing in Athlete Footwear: Nike and Reebok. Harvard Business School Case 9-394-189, 6.

[46]   DeTienne, K.B. and Lewis, L.W. (2005) The Pragmatic and Ethical Barriers to Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Nike Case. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 359-376.

[47]   Luce, S. (2017) Living Wages: A US Perspective. Employee Relations, 39, 863-874.

[48]   Wolf, J. (2014) The Relationship between Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Stakeholder Pressure and Corporate Sustainability Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 317-328.

[49]   Gallego-Alvarez, I., Prado-Lorenzo, J.M., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L. and García-Sánchez, I.M. (2010) Are Social and Environmental Practices a Marketing Tool? Empirical Evidence for the Biggest European Companies. Management Decision, 48, 1440-1455.

[50]   Brammer, S. and Pavelin, S. (2004) Building a Good Reputation. European Management Journal, 22, 704-713.

[51]   Toms, J.S. (2002) Firm Resources, Quality Signals and the Determinants of Corporate Environmental Reputation: Some UK Evidence. The British Accounting Review, 34, 257-282.

[52]   Fombrun, C. and Shanley, M. (1990) What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233-258.

[53]   Gavana, G., Gottardo, P. and Moisello, A.M. (2018) Do Customers Value CSR Disclosure? Evidence from Italian Family and Non-Family Firms. Sustainability, 10, 1642.

[54]   Paul, C.J. and Siegel, D.S. (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 26, 207-211.

[55]   Nekhili, M., Nagati, H., Chtioui, T. and Rebolledo, C. (2017) Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Market Value: Family versus Nonfamily Firms. Journal of Business Research, 77, 41-52.

[56]   Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995) The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.