Phillip B. Williams¹, Ahmad Khalilian¹, Michael W. Marshall², Joe Mari Maja², Haibo Liu³, Dara Park³, Ali Mirzakhani Nafchi⁴

Show more
¹ Department of Agricultural Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, USA.
² Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Blackville, USA.
³ Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, USA.
⁴ Cooperative Extension Service, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.
Show less

Abstract: Recent increases in irrigated hectares in the Southeastern US have enabled growers to obtain higher yields through applying nutrients through irrigation water. Therefore, many growers apply nutrients through irrigation systems, known as fertigation. Currently, there are no practical decision-making tools available for variable-rate application of nitrogen (N) through overhead sprinkler irrigation systems. Therefore, field tests were conducted on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) during the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons to 1) adapt the Clemson sensor-based N recommendation algorithms from a single side-dress application to multiple applications through an overhead irrigation system; and 2) to compare sensor-based VRFS with conventional nutrient management methods in terms of N use efficiency (NUE) and crop responses on three soil types. Two seasons of testing Clemson N prediction algorithms to apply multiple applications of N were very promising. The multiple applications of N compared to the grower’s conventional methods (even though less N was applied) had no impact on yields in either growing season. There was no difference in cotton yields between 101 and 135 kg/ha N applications in either management zone. Also, there were no differences in yield between sensor-based, multiple N applications and conventional N management techniques. In relation to comparisons of the sensor methods only applying N in three or four applications, statistically increased yields compared to single or split applications in 2016. Applying N in four applications, statistically increased yields compared to single, split or triple applications in 2017. When the sensor-based methods were compared to the grower’s conventional methods averaged over four treatments, the sensor-based N applications reduced fertilizer requirement by 69% in 2016 and 57% in 2017 compared to grower’s conventional methods. When comparing N rates among the four sensor-based methods (three or four) applications, increased N rates by 22 kg/ha in 2016 and 26 kg/ha in 2017 compared to single or split applications but increased the cotton lint yields by 272 and 139 kg/ha, for 2016 and 2017, respectively.

Keywords: Cotton, Nitrogen, Fertility, Fertigation, Irrigation, Variable Rate, Sensor, Nutrient Management, Precision Agriculture, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)

Cite this paper: Williams, P. , Khalilian, A. , Marshall, M. , Maja, J. , Liu, H. , Park, D. and Nafchi, A. (2019) Cotton Response to Variable Nitrogen Rate Fertigation through an Overhead Irrigation System. Agricultural Sciences, 10, 66-80. doi: 10.4236/as.2019.101006.

References

[1]   Khalilian, A., Han, Y.J. and Farahani, H.J. (2008) Site-Specific Irrigation Management in Coastal Plain Soils. Proceedings of the 2008 South Carolina Water Resources Conference, 14-15 October 2008.
https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1239&context=scwrc

[2]   Miller, G.A. (2012) Sensor Based Irrigation Effects on Root Distribution and Growth of Grafted and Non-Grafted Watermelons. All Dissertations, 911.
https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/911

[3]   United States Department of Agriculture (2017) National Agricultural Statistics Service, Crop Production Summary.
http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/CropProdSu/CropProdSu-01-12-2018.pdf

[4]   Oosterhuis, D. (2009) Foliar Fertilization: Mechanisms and Magnitude of Nutrient uptake. Proceedings of the Fluid Forum, Phoenix, AZ, 15-17 February 2009.
http://www.fluidfertilizer.com/Forum%20Presentations/2009/2009%20Forum%20Proceedings/
Derrick%20Oosterhuis.pdf

[5]   Duffera, M., White, J. and Weisz, R. (2007) Spatial Variability of Southeastern U.S. Coastal Plain Soil Physical Properties: Implications for Site-Specific Management. Geoderma, 137, 327-339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.08.018

[6]   Scharf, P., Lorry, J., Kitchen, N., Sudduth, K. and Davis, J. (2002) Spatial Variability of Optimum N Rate for Corn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

[7]   EPA (2017) Goose Creek Reassessment and Reconsideration, Prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-05/documents/goose_creek_pa_
reassessment_reconsideration.pdf

[8]   American Public Health Association (APHA) (1992) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th Edition, American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF), Washington DC.

[9]   Nafchi, A.M., Maja, J.M., Khalilian, A., Han, Y., Rogers, N., Payero, J.O., Marshall, M.W., Williams, P.B. and Fox, J. (2017) An Electro-Mechanical Controller for Adjusting Piston Pump Stroke On-the-Go for Site-Specific Application of Crop Nutrients. Agricultural Sciences, 8, 949-959.
https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2017.89069

[10]   Khalilian, A., Henderson, W., Han, Y. and Wiatrak, P.J. (2008) Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Cotton through Optical Sensing. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, TN, 8-11 January 2008, 583-587.

[11]   Khalilian, A., Porter, W., Henderson, W., Han, Y. and Barnes, E. (2011) Sensor Based Nitrogen Management for Cotton Production in Coastal Plain Soils. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, TN, 4-7 January 2011, 531-537.

[12]   Khalilian, A., Rogers, N., Williams, P., Han, Y., Nafchi, A., Maja, J., Marshall, M.W. and Payero, J. (2017) Sensor-Based Algorithm for Mid-Season Nitrogen Application in Corn. Open Journal of Soil Science, 7, 278-287.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2017.710020

[13]   Wiatrak, P., Khalilian, A., Wallace, D., Henderson, W. and Hallman, R. (2008) Incorporating Soil Electric Conductivity and Optical Sensing Technology to Develop a Site-Specific Nitrogen Application for Corn in South Carolina. Proceedings of the 30th Southern Conservation Agricultural Systems Conference, Tifton, GA, 29-31 July 2008, 107-112.
http://www.ag.auburn.edu/auxiliary/nsdl/scasc/

[14]   Porter, W. M., Khalilian, A., Henderson, W. and Han, Y. (2010) Sensor-Based Site-Specific Nitrogen Management in Cotton. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, TN, 4-7 January 2010, 518-523.

[15]   Verbree, D., McClure, A. and Leib, B. (2013) Fertigation of Row Crops Using Overhead Irrigation. University of Tennessee Extension Publication, W303.
https://extension.tennessee.edu/publications/Documents/W303.pdf

[16]   USDA (1977) Soil Conservation Service, Barnwell County, South Carolina.
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_MANUSCRIPTS/south_carolina/barnwellSC1977/
barnwell.pdf

[17]   Williams, P., Khalilian, A., Marshall, M.W., Maja, J., Liu, H., Park, D. and Nafchi, A. (2018) Development and Testing of a Variable Rate Nitrogen Application System through an Overhead Irrigation System. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 10, 994-1011.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2018.1010058