PSYCH  Vol.2 No.9 , December 2011
The Survival Processing Memory Effect Should Generalise to Source Memory, but It Doesn’t
ABSTRACT
Numerous studies have shown that words judged for their relvance to a scenario of survival are remembered better than words from lists processed differently. Survival processing is even more effective than many mnemonic techniques. This has been interpreted as an evolutionary design feature of memory. It is argued that such a survival effect should be even more pronounced in remembering the context or source of the information. Two experiments used a source monitoring paradigm. Both studies did not find any evidence for enhanced context memory, thus questioning the evolutionary account of the survival processing effect. An alternative interpretation is discussed.

Cite this paper
nullBröder, A. , Krüger, N. & Schütte, S. (2011). The Survival Processing Memory Effect Should Generalise to Source Memory, but It Doesn’t. Psychology, 2, 896-901. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.29135.
References
[1]   Anderson, J. R. (1991). Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 471-517. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00070801

[2]   Barrett, L., Dunbar, R., & Lycett, J. (2002). Human evolutionary psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[3]   Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.197

[4]   Br?der, A., & Meiser, T. (2007). Measuring source memory. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215, 52-60.

[5]   Buss, D. M. (1992). Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Hrsg.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. (pp. 249-266). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

[6]   Buss, D. M. (2003). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

[7]   Butler, A. C., Kang, S. H. K., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Congruity effects between materials and processing tasks in the survival processing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1477-1486. doi:10.1037/a0017024

[8]   Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

[9]   Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187-276. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1

[10]   De Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). Impression formation and cooperative behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 305-328. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<305::AID-EJSP929>3.0.CO;2-R

[11]   Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408

[12]   Flexser, A. J., & Tulving, E. (1978). Retrieval independence in recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 85, 153-171. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.153

[13]   Godden, D., & Baddeley, A. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 325-331. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x

[14]   Howe, M. L., & Derbish, M. H. (2010). On the susceptibility of adaptive memory to false memory illusions. Cognition, 115, 252-267. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.016

[15]   Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3

[16]   Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Cohen, S. M. (2008). The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1151-1156. doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1151

[17]   Kroneisen, M. (2010). On the nature of the survival processing effect. Unpublished Dissertation, Mannheim: University of Mannheim.

[18]   Kroneisen, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2011). On the plasticity of the survival processing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37, 1553-1562. doi:10.1037/a0024493

[19]   Meiser, T., & Br?der, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116-137. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.116

[20]   Murnane, K., & Bayen, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 417-428. doi:10.3758/BF03200931

[21]   Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. (2008). Adaptive memory: Remembering with a stone-age brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 239-243. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00582.x

[22]   Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2011). Congruity effects in the survival processing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 539-549. doi:10.1037/a0021960

[23]   Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N., & Thompson, S. R. (2008). Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176-180. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02064.x

[24]   Nairne, J. S., Thompson, S. R., & Pandeirada, J. N. (2007). Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 263-273. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.263

[25]   Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N., Smith, M. A., Grimaldi, P. J., & Bauernschmidt, A. (2010). Adaptive memory: Does survival processing enhance nenory for source? 51st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St Louis, 18-21 November 2010.

[26]   Otgaar, H., & Smeets, T. (2010). Adaptive memory: Survival processing increases both true and false memory in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1010-1016. doi:10.1037/a0019402

[27]   Otgaar, H., Smeets, T., & Van Bergen, S. (2010). Picturing survival memories: Enhanced memory after fitness-relevant processing occurs for verbal and visual stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 38, 23-28. doi:10.3758/MC.38.1.23

[28]   Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 45, 255-287.

[29]   Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positivenegative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology. (Vol. 1, pp. 33-60). Chichester: Wiley.

[30]   Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton & Co.

[31]   Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1987). A neuropsychological study of fact memory and source amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 464-473. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.464

[32]   Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34

[33]   Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174

[34]   Soderstrom, N. C., & McCabe, D. P. (2011). Are survival processing memory advantages based on ancestral priorities? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 564-569. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0060-6

[35]   Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.10.4.527

[36]   Weinstein, Y., Bugg, J. M., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory process? Memory & Cognition, 36, 913-919. doi:10.3758/MC.36.5.913

[37]   Wilkinson, L. & The Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594

 
 
Top