Back
 AS  Vol.9 No.10 , October 2018
Measurement of Cotton Transpiration
Abstract: There are a few field methods available to directly measure water evapotranspiration (ET) along with its two components, evaporation from the soil (E) and from the crop (T). One such technique that measures T, uses sensors to calculate the sap flow (F) of water through the plant stem and is based on the conservation of mass and energy, i.e., the stem heat balance method. This instrument consists of a flexible heater that is wrapped around the plant stem with temperature sensors to measure the difference in temperature of F below and above the heater. This is a null method, where all inputs and outputs are known and the calculated F is a direct measure of T. This method has been used to measure T in a variety of crops, including cotton, grapes, olive trees, soybean, ornamental and horticultural crops. A new version of the EXO-SkinTM is the Stem Gauge Dual Channel Design (SGDCTM), which was commercially introduced and had a radically new design resulting in a different energy balance, compared to the original design, which needed experimental verification. An initial evaluation was done with potted cotton (Gossypium hirsutum, L.) plants in a greenhouse experiment showing that values of cotton-T measured with the new sensor were accurate; however, this comparison was limited to daily T < 2 mm/d. Thus, our objective was to expand the initial evaluation of the new sensor under field conditions and for daily values of cotton-T in the 2 - 7 mm/d range, representative of the semiarid Texas High Plains. For this purpose, cotton was planted on 12 June 2017 on a 1000 m2 plot in a soil classified in the Amarillo series at the facilities of the USDA-ARS, Lubbock, TX. For a period of 15 days, 2 to 16 Sep 2017, we measured hourly cotton-T with the new sensors and with portable growth chambers (0.75 m × 1 m cross-section, and 1 m height) where water vapor flux was measured at a 10 Hz frequency using an infrared gas analyzer. We used three chambers and, in each chamber, the new sensors were installed on four cotton plants. We used linear regression analysis to compare hourly and daily values of cotton-T measured with the sap flow gauges against T measured by the chambers. Using a t-test (p < 0.001) we tested if the slope of the line was significantly different than 1 and if the intercept was significantly different than 0. Pooling all data yielded an almost 1:1 relation between values for a daily transpiration range from 2 to 7 mm/d. We concluded that the new sensor provides a robust and direct measure of hourly and daily cotton-T for a wide range of environmental conditions.
Cite this paper: Lascano, R. , Baker, J. , Payton, P. , Gitz III, D. , Mahan, J. and Goebel, T. (2018) Measurement of Cotton Transpiration. Agricultural Sciences, 9, 1299-1316. doi: 10.4236/as.2018.910091.
References

[1]   Lascano, R.J. (2007) The Soil-Plant-Atmosphere System and Monitoring Technology. In: Lascano, R.J. and Sojka, R.E., Eds., Irrigation of Agricultural Crops, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Monograph No. 30, 85-115.

[2]   Lascano, R.J., Duesterhaus, J.L., Booker, J.D., Goebel, T.S. and Baker, J.T. (2014) Field Measurement of Cotton Seedling Evapotranspiration. Agricultural Sciences, 5, 1237-1252.
https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.513132

[3]   Lascano, R.J., Van Bavel, C.H.M., Hatfield, J.L. and Upchurch, D.R. (1987) Energy and Water Balance of a Sparse Crop: Simulated and Measured Soil and Crop Evaporation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51, 1113-1121.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050004x

[4]   Kool, D., Agam, N., Lazarovitch, N., Heitman, J.L., Sauer, T.J. and Ben-Gal, A. (2014) A Review of Approaches for Evapotranspiration Partitioning. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 184, 56-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.09.003

[5]   Lascano, R.J. (2000) A General System to Measure and Calculate Daily Crop Water Use. Agronomy Journal, 92, 821-832.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.925821x

[6]   Sakuratani, T. (1981) A Heat Balance Method for Measuring Water Flux in the Stem of Intact Plants. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 37, 9-17.
https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.37.9

[7]   Baker, J.M. and van Bavel, C.H.M. (1987) Measurement of Mass Flow of Water in the Stems of Herbaceous Plants. Plant, Cell and Environment, 10, 777-782.

[8]   Lascano, R.J., Goebel, T.S., Booker, J., Baker, J.T. and Gitz III, D.C. (2016) The Stem Heat Balance Methods to Measure Transpiration: Evaluation of a New Sensor. Agricultural Sciences, 7, 604-620.
https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2016.79057

[9]   Baker, J.T., Van Pelt, S., Gitz III, D.C., Payton, P., Lascano, R.J. and McMichael, B. (2009) Canopy Gas Exchange Measurements of Cotton in an Open System. Agronomy Journal, 101, 52-59.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0007x

[10]   Baker, J.T., Gitz III, D.C. and Lascano, R.J. (2014) Field Evaluation of Open System Chambers for Measuring Whole Canopy Gas Exchanges. Agronomy Journal, 106, 537-544.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0449

[11]   Baker, J.T., Gitz III, D.C., Payton, P., Broughton, K.J., Bange, M.P. and Lascano, R.J. (2014) Carbon Dioxide Control in an Open System That Measures Canopy Gas Exchanges. Agronomy Journal, 106, 789-792.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj13.0450

[12]   Marek, T., Piccinni, G., Schneider, A., Howell, T., Jett, M. and Dusek, D. (2006) Weighing Lysimeters for the Determination of Crop Water Requirements and Crop Coefficients. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 22, 851-856.
https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.22256

[13]   Wilson, K.B., Hanson, P.J., Mulholland, P.J., Baldocchi, D.D. and Wullschleger, S.D. (2001) A Comparison of Methods for Determining Forest Evapotranspiration and Its Components: Sap-Flow, Soil Water Budget, Eddy Covariance and Catchment Water Balance. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 106, 153-168.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00199-4

[14]   McInnes, K.J. and Heilman, J.L. (2005) Relaxed Eddy Accumulation. In: Hatfield, J.L., Baker, J.M. and Viney, M.K., Eds., Micrometeorology in Agricultural Systems, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. Monograph No. 47, 437-453.

[15]   Fritschen, L.J. and Fritschen, C.L. (2005) Bowen Ratio Energy Balance Method. In: Hatfield, J.L., Baker, J.M. and Viney, M.K., Eds., Micrometeorology in Agricultural Systems, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. Monograph No. 47, 397-405.

[16]   Irmak, S., Skaggs, K.E. and Chatterjee, S. (2014) A Review of the Bowen Ratio Surface Energy Balance Method for Quantifying Evapotranspiration and Other Energy Fluxes. Transactions of the ASABE, 57, 1657-1674.

[17]   Lascano, R.J., Baumhardt, R.L. and Lipe, W.N. (1992) Measurement of Water Flow in Young Grapevines Using the Stem Heat Balance Method. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 43, 159-165.

[18]   Cammalleri, C., Rallo, G., Agnese, C., Ciraolo, G., Minacapilli, M. and Provenzano, G. (2013) Combined Use of Eddy Covariance and Sap Flow Techniques for Partition of ET Fluxes and Water Stress Assessment in an Irrigated Olive Orchard. Agricultural Water Management, 120, 89-97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.003

[19]   Steinberg, S., Van Bavel, C.H.M. and McFarland, M.J. (1989) A Gauge to Measure Mass Flow Rate of Sap in Stem and Trunks of Woody Plants. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 114, 466-472.

[20]   Ham, J.L., Heilman, J.L. and Lascano, R.J. (1990) Determination of Soil Water Evaporation and Transpiration from Energy Balance and Stem Flow Measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 52, 287-301.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(90)90087-M

[21]   Tan, C.S. and Buttery, B.R. (1995) Determination of the Water Use of Two Pair of Soybean Isolines Differing in Stomatal Frequency Using a Stem Heat Balance Stem Flow Gauge. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences, 75, 99-103.
https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps95-016

[22]   Sauer, T.J., Singer, J.W., Prueger, T.J.H., DeSutter, M. and Hatfield, J.L. (2007) Radiation Balance and Evaporation Partitioning in a Narrow-Row Soybean Canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 145, 206-214.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.015

[23]   Van Bavel, C.H.M. and Van Bavel, M.G. (1993) Apparatus for Measuring Sap Flow. US Patent No. 5269183.

[24]   Van Bavel, C.H.M. and Van Bavel, M.G. (1994) Apparatus for Measuring Sap Flow. US Patent No. 5337604.

[25]   Van Bavel, M.G. (2013) Sap Flow Sensor Apparatus. US Patent 8590373 B1.

[26]   Howell, T.A., Schneider, A.D. and Jensen, M.E. (1991) History of Lysimeters Design and Use for Evapotranspiration Measurements. In: Allen, R.A., Howell, T.A., Pruitt, W.O., Walter, I.A. and Jensen, M.E., Eds., Lysimeters for Evapotranspiration and Environmental Measurements, American Society of Civil Engineers, Honolulu, 9 p.

[27]   Howell, T.A., Schneider, A.D., Dusek, D.A., Marek, T.H. and Steiner, J.L. (1995) Calibration and Scale Performance of Bushland Weighing Lysimeters. Transactions of the ASAE, 38, 1019-1024.
https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27918

[28]   Marek, T.H., Schneider, A.D., Howell, T.A. and Ebeling, L.L. (1988) Design and Construction of Large Weighing Monolithic Lysimeters. Transactions of the ASAE, 31, 477-484.
https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30734

[29]   Long, S.P., Farage, P.K. and Garcia, R.L. (1996) Measurement of Leaf and Canopy Photosynthetic CO2 Exchange in the Field. Journal of Experimental Botany, 47, 1629-1642.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.11.1629

[30]   Baumhardt, R.L., Lascano, R.J. and Krieg, D.R. (1995) Physical and Hydraulic Properties of a Pullman and Amarillo Soil on the Texas South Plains. Technical Report No. 95-1, TAES/TAMU, College Station, 17 p.

[31]   Grime, V.L., Morison, J.I.L. and Simmonds, L.P. (1995) Including the Heat Storage Term in Sap Flow Measurements with the Stem Heat Balance Method. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 74, 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(94)02187-O

[32]   LI-COR (2011) Using the LI-6400/LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System. Version 6, Li-Cor Biosciences, Inc., Lincoln, 1324 p.

[33]   Kobayashi, K. and Salam, M.Y. (2000) Comparing Simulated and Measured Values Using Mean Squared Deviation and Its Components. Agronomy Journal, 92, 345-352.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.922345x

 
 
Top