AD  Vol.6 No.4 , October 2018
Hemiunu Used Numerically Tagged Surface Ratios to Mark Ceilings inside the Great Pyramid Hinting at Designed Spaces Still Hidden Within
Abstract: In 1883, W. M. Flinders Petrie noticed that the vertical thickness and height of certain stone courses of the Great Pyramid2 of Khufu/Cheops at Giza, Egypt markedly increase compared to those immediately lower periodically and conspicuously interrupting a general trend of progressive course thinning towards the summit. Having calculated the surface area of each course, Petrie further noted that the courses immediately below such discrete stone thickness peaks tended to mark integer multiples of 1/25th of the surface area at ground level. Here I show that the probable architect of the Great Pyramid, Khufu’s vizier Hemiunu, conceptualized its vertical construction design using surface areas based on the same numerical principles used to design his own mastaba in Giza’s western cemetery and conspicuously used this numerical theme to mark the location of known spaces inside the Great Pyramid. The theme is not only consistent with some spaces proposed still awaiting proof but also suggests there are some still undiscovered.
Cite this paper: Seyfzadeh, M. (2018) Hemiunu Used Numerically Tagged Surface Ratios to Mark Ceilings inside the Great Pyramid Hinting at Designed Spaces Still Hidden Within. Archaeological Discovery, 6, 319-337. doi: 10.4236/ad.2018.64016.

[1]   Allen, J. P. (2005). The Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.

[2]   Brier, B., & Houdin, J.-P. (2008). The Secret of the Great Pyramid. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.

[3]   Dash, G. (2012). New Angles on the Great Pyramid. AERAGRAM, 13, 10-19.

[4]   Gantenbrink, R. (1997). Ascertaining and Evaluating Relevant Structural Points Using the Cheops Pyramid as an Example. ORDO ET MENSURA CONGRESS VI-1997/DEUTSCHES MUSEUM MüNCHEN.

[5]   Heritage Innovation Preservation Institute (HIP), ScanPyramids (2016). Results from the First Measurements Campaign in the Bent Pyramid.

[6]   Junker, H. (1929). Giza I. Die Mastabas der IV. Dynastie auf dem Westfriedhof. Hölder-Wien und Leipzig: Pichler-Tempsky A.-G.

[7]   Krauss, R. (1997). Astronomische Konzept e und Jenseitsvorstellungen in den Pyramidentexten. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.

[8]   Lightbody, D. I. (2018). Is the Great Pyramid’s ‘Big Void’ in Fact Caused by Two Construction Space Zones Flanking the Grand Gallery? Looking for Plausible Interpretations of the ScanPyramids Data Set. Working Paper.

[9]   Maragioglio, V., & Rinaldi, C. A. (1965). L’Architetturadelle Piramidi Menfite 4. Le Grande Piramide di Cheope. Tavole. Tipografia Canessa: Rapallo.

[10]   Morishima, K., Kuno1, M., Nishio, A., Kitagawa, N., Manabe1, Y., Moto, M., Takasaki, F., Fujii, H., Satoh, K., Kodama, H., Hayashi, K., Odaka, S., Procureur, S., Attié, D., Bouteille, S., Calvet, D., Filosa, C., Magnier, P., Mandjavidze, I., Riallot, M., Marini, B., Gable, P., Date, Y., Sugiura, M., Elshayeb, Y., Elnady, T., Ezzy, M., Guerriero, E., Steiger, V., Serikoff, N., Mouret, J.-P., Charlès, B., Helal, H., & Tayoubi, M. (2017). Discovery of a Big Void in Khufu’s Pyramid by Observation of Cosmic-Ray Muons. Nature, 552, 386-390.

[11]   Petrie, W. M. F. (1883). The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh. London: Field & Tuer, Ye Leadenhalle Presse; Simpkin Marshall & Co., Stationers Hall Court; Hamilton, Adams, and Co., Paternoster Row. New York: Scribner & Welford.

[12]   Seyfzadeh, M. (2018). Essential Design of the Great Pyramid Encoded in Hemiunu’s Mastaba at Giza. Archaeological Discovery, 6, 162-172.

[13]   Seyfzadeh, M., & Schoch, R. M. (2018). The Inventory Stele: More Fact than Fiction. Archaeological Discovery, 6, 103-161.