JWARP  Vol.10 No.8 , August 2018
Effects of Influential Parameters on Long-Term Channel Evolution Following Low-Head Dam Construction and Removal
Abstract: The long-term existence of dam structures significantly modified the river channel. In accordance with a drastic increase of low-head dams under consideration for removal in recent years, it is important to predict the effects of low-head dam removal from the modified river channel by the low-head dam construction. This study intends to investigate the long-term channel evolution process following low-head construction and removal and to find out the influential parameters (sediment diameter, river bed slope, dam height) for those channel evolution by two-dimensional numerical simulation model. Following the low-head dam construction, sediment deposition rates in upstream of the low-head dam are varied with the influential parameters. The sediment deposition rates and sandbar formation with riparian vegetation settlement on sandbars have significantly affected for channel evolution following low-head dam removal. Especially the knickpoint formation and the types of vegetation (grass type and tree type) on the sandbars are critical factors for channel evolution following low-head dam removal. Through the numerical simulation results of low-head dam construction (50 years) and low-head dam removal (50 years), it is identified that the modified river channel by low-head dam may not be easily restored to pre-dam conditions following its removal especially in river geomorphology and riparian vegetation. Consequently, this study found that the reversibility following low-head dam construction and removal depends on the sediment deposition rates in upstream of the low-head dam.
Cite this paper: Kim, S. and Toda, Y. (2018) Effects of Influential Parameters on Long-Term Channel Evolution Following Low-Head Dam Construction and Removal. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 10, 780-793. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2018.108044.

[1]   Hart, D.D., Johnson, T.E., Bushaw-Newton, K.L., Horwitz, R.J., Bednarek, A.T., Charles, D.F., Kreeger, D.A. and Velinsky, D.J. (2002) Dam Removal: Challenges and Opportunities for Ecological Research and River Restoration. BioScience, 52, 669-682.[0669:DRCAOF]2.0.CO;2

[2]   Doyle, M.W., Stanley, E.H. and Harbor, J.M. (2003) Channel Adjustments Following Two Dam Removals in Wisconsin. Water Resources Research, 39, 1011-1025.

[3]   Hupp, C.R. and Simon, A. (1991) Bank Accretion and the Development of Vegetated Depositional Surfaces along Modified Alluvial Channels. Geomorphology, 4, 111-124.

[4]   Osterkamp, W.R. and Hupp, C.R. (2010) Fluvial Process and Vegetation—Glimpses of the Past, the Present, and Perhaps the Future. Geomorphology, 116, 274-285.

[5]   Kim, S.N., Toda, Y. and Tsujimoto, T. (2014) Effects of Low-Head Dam Removal on River Morphology and Riparian Vegetation: A Case Study of Gongreung River. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 6, 1682-1690.

[6]   Meyer-Peter, E. and Muller, R. (1948) Formulas for Bed Load Transport. Proceedings of 2nd meeting of the International Association for Hydraulic Structures Research, Delft, 7 June 1948, 39-64.

[7]   Hasegawa, K. (1981) Bank-Erosion Discharge Based on a Non-Equilibrium Theory. Transactions of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 316, 37-52.

[8]   Toda, T., Kim, S.N. and Tsujimoto, T. (2014) Relation between Sandbar Mode and Vegetation Expansion in Sand-Bed River. Proceedings of River Flow 2014, Lausanne, 3-5 September, 429.

[9]   Jensen, P.B. (1932) Die Stoffproduktion der Pflanzen. Fischer.

[10]   Yagisawa, J. and Tanaka, N. (2009) Dynamic Growth Model of River Vegetation Considering the Destruction by Floods and Regeneration Process of Trees. Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 53, 1171-1176.

[11]   Lajczak, A. (1996) Modelling the Long-Term Course of Non-Flushed Reservoir Sedimentation and Estimating the Life of Dams. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 21, 1091-1107.<1091::AID-ESP653>3.0.CO;2-2

[12]   Cantelli, A., Paola, C. and Parker, G. (2004) Experiments on Upstream-Migrating Erosional Narrowing and Widening of an Incisional Channel Caused by Dam Removal. Water Resources Research, 40, W03304.

[13]   Toniolo, H., Parker, G. and Voller, V. (2007) Role of Ponded Turbidity Currents in Reservoir Trap Efficiency. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133, 579-595.

[14]   Csiki, S. and Rhoads, B.L. (2010) Hydraulic and Geomorphological Effects of Run-of-River Dams. Progress in Physical Geography, 34, 755-780.

[15]   Robinson, K.M., Bennett, S.J., Casali, J. and Hanson, G.J. (2000) Processes of Headcut Growth and Migration in Rills and Gullies. International Journal of Sediment Research, 15, 69-82.

[16]   Pizzuto, J. (2002) Effects of Dam Removal on River form and Process. BioScience, 52, 683-691.[0683:EODROR]2.0.CO;2

[17]   Doyle, M.W., Stanley, E.H., Orr, C.H., Selle, A.R., Sethi, S.A. and Harbor, J.M. (2005) Stream Ecosystem Response to Small Dam Removal: Lessons from the Heartland. Geomorphology, 71, 227-244.

[18]   Sawaske, S.R. and Freyberg, D.L. (2012) A Comparison of Past Small Dam Removals in Highly Sediment-Impacted Systems in the US. Geomorphology, 151-152, 50-58.

[19]   Kim, S., Toda, Y. and Tsujimoto, T. (2015) Geomorphological and Riparian Vegetation Responses Following a Low-Head Dam Removal: A Study Based on Literature Review. International Journal of River Basin Management, 13, 315-324.