JILSA  Vol.10 No.3 , August 2018
Identifying Brain Characteristics of Bright Students
Abstract: Gifted students have different ways of learning. They are characterized by a fitful level of attention and intuitive reasoning. In order to distinguish gifted students from normal students, we conducted an experiment with 17 pupils, willing participants in this study. We collected different types of data (gender, age, performance, initial average in math and EEG mental states) in a web platform called NetMath intending for the learning of mathematics. We selected ten tasks divided into three difficulty levels (easy, medium and hard). Participants were invited to respond to top-level exercises on the four basic operations in decimals. Our first results confirmed that the student’s performance has no relation with age. A younger 9-year-old student achieved a higher score than the group with an average of 68.18%. This student can be considered as a gifted one. The gifted students can be also characterized by a mean value of attention (around 60%). They also can be defined by slightly weaker values of their mental states of attention and workload in comparison with the weak pupils.
Cite this paper: Ghali, R. , Abdessalem, H. , Frasson, C. and Nkambou, R. (2018) Identifying Brain Characteristics of Bright Students. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 10, 93-103. doi: 10.4236/jilsa.2018.103006.

[1]   Zettel, J. (1997) State Provisions for Educating the Gifted and Talented. In: Passow, A.H., Ed., The Gifted and The Talented: Their Education and Development, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 63-74.

[2]   Gigerenzer, G. (2007) Gut Feeling: The Intelligence of Unconsciousness. Penguin.

[3]   Torrance, E.P. (1965) Gifted Children in Classroom. MacMillan, New York,

[4]   Feldhusen, J.F., Treffinger, D.J. and Elias, R.M. (1969) The Right Kind of Programmed Instructions for the Gifted and Talented. National Society for Programmed Instruction Journal, 8, 6-11.

[5]   Wechsler, D. (1949) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.

[6]   Wechsler, D. (1999) Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.

[7]   Raven, J.C. (1941) Standardization of Progressive Matrices, 1938. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 19, 137-150.

[8]   Marland, S.P. (1972) Education of the Gifted and Talented, Volume I—Report to the Congress of the United States. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.

[9]   Terman, L.M. (1925) Genetic Studies of Genius. Vol. 1. Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

[10]   Renzulli, J.S. (1986) The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness: A Developmental Model for Creative Productivity. In: Sternberg, R.J. and Davidson, J.E., Eds., Conceptions of Giftedness, Cambridge University Press, New York, 53-92.

[11]   Sternberg, R.J. (2000) Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, New York.

[12]   Sternberg, R.J., Jarvin, L. and Grigorenko, E.L. (2010) Explorations in Giftedness. Cambridge University Press, New York.

[13]   Flanagan, D.P. and Alfonso, V.C. (2017) Essentials of WISC-V Assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.

[14]   Vaivre-Douret, L. (2011) Developmental and Cognitive Characteristics of “High-Level Potentialities” (Highly Gifted) Children. International Journal of Pediatrics, 2011, Article ID: 420297.

[15]   Doucet, C. (2017) Douance. Dépister, comprendre et accompagner.

[16]   Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G. and Cohen, L. (1998) Abstract Representation of Numbers in the Animal and Human Brain. Trends in Neuroscience, 21, 355-361.

[17]   Benbow, C.P. (1988) Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Intellectually Talented Preadolescents. Brain and Behavioural Sciences, 11, 169-232.

[18]   Dehaene, S. (1997) The Number Sense. Oxford University Press, London.

[19]   O’Boyle, M. (2005) Some Current Findings on Brain Characteristics of the Mathematically Gifted Adolescent. International Education Journal, 6, 247-251.

[20]   Lui, T., Shi, J., Zhao, D. and Yang, J. (2008) The Relationship between EEG Band Power, Cognitive Processing and Intelligence in School Aged Children. Psychology Science Quaterly, 50, 259-268.