Back
 IJMPCERO  Vol.7 No.3 , August 2018
Quality Control of Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
Abstract: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a dominant technique for the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD). Quality control (QC) of DXA is very important for the accuracy of results and correct interpretation made by the physician. We have performed the quality control procedures of Lunar DPX Pro bone densitometer according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and current clinical guidelines at the Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Allied Sciences (INMAS), Khulna. The objective of this study is to maximize the performance of the technologist as well as the reliability of the equipment (Linearity, X-ray tube output, Half value layer, Kerma-area product, Radiation field size, Fan angle, Spatial resolution, Room safety). The study result shows that the mean BMD reading is 1.004 g/cm2 with a standard deviation of 0.0035 and co-efficient of variation 0.34%. It also shows that the precision of the technologist is good and there is no malfunctioning in the DXA bone densitometer.
Cite this paper: Reza, M. , Paul, A. , Khan, H. and Rahman, M. (2018) Quality Control of Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 7, 323-329. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2018.73026.
References

[1]   Zaman, M.U., et al. (2009) Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA): Basic Techniques and Clinical Facts. Pakistan Journal of Radiology, 19, 56-59.

[2]   Guglielmi, G., et al. (2014) Quality Assurance in Bone Densitometry. Current Cardiology Reports, 2, 33.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-013-0033-9

[3]   World Health Organization (2007) Assessment of Osteoporosis at the Primary Health Care Level. Summary Report of a WHO Scientific Group.

[4]   World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of Fracture Risk and Its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Technical Report Series 843. WHO, Geneva.

[5]   Lewiecki, E.M. and Lane, N.E. (2008) Common Mistakes in the Clinical Use of Bone Mineral Density Testing. Nature Clinical Practice, Rheumatology, 4, 667-674.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncprheum0928

[6]   Lewiecki, E.M., Binkley, N. and Petak, S.M. (2006) DXA Quality Matters. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 9, 388-392.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2006.07.002

[7]   Slavchev, A., et al. (2008) National Protocol for Quality Assurance in DXA-Bone Densitometry. Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering, 14, 207-215.
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10013-008-0017-x

[8]   Larkin, A., et al. (2008) Commissioning and Quality Assurance of Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) System. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. (In Press)

[9]   Sheahan, N.F., et al. (2005) Commissioning and Quality Assurance Protocols for Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Systems. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 117, 288-290.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nci741

 
 
Top