AS  Vol.9 No.7 , July 2018
Quantification of Radiation Use Efficiency and Yield of Wheat as Influenced by Different Levels of Nitrogen and Water Stress under Semi-Arid Conditions of Faisalabad
ABSTRACT
Crop production is greatly influenced by water and nutrition stress in semi-arid areas. Nitrogen and water are two most important yield limiting factors which effect economic production of wheat. Drought initiates when large area of land suffers from absence of precipitation for temporary periods. Though, not only water scarceness but also low relative humidity and high temperature are other climate factors which induce drought condition. Whereas Effective nutrition (nitrogen) maintains crops metabolic activities and has the potential to lessen drought stress. According to study carried out to explore the influence of varying levels of potential soil moisture deficit (PSMD) and nitrogen, an experiment was planned at agronomy research area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. It was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with split plot arrangement, and replicated thrice. Two factors: potential soil moisture deficit levels (I1: irrigation at 50 mm PSMD, I2: irrigation at 75 mm PSMD and I3: irrigation at 100 mm PSMD) were randomized in main plots, while sub plot nitrogen levels {control (No nitrogen), 50, 100 and 150 kg N ha-1} were randomized. Adequate nitrogen application along with sufficient irrigation management gave highest yield. Under water deficit conditions adequate nitrogen application ameliorates the drought stress. Highest plant height (86.27 cm), number of productive tillers (320.0), grain·spike-1(49.73), test weight (50.55 g) and grain yield (6.72 t·ha-1) were observed with 75 mm PSMD and 150 kg·ha-1 application of nitrogen. While radiation use efficiency for dry matter accumulation of wheat ranged from 1.53 - 1.87 g·MJ-1 whereas, radiation use efficiency for grain yield ranged from 0.421 - 0.473 g·MJ-1. Results revealed that highest RUE obtained I3 (75 mm PSMD) and nitrogen application at 150 kg·ha-1. Judicial application of irrigation and fertilizer not only boosts the yield but also saves resource and increases former output.

1. Introduction

Wheat is a cereal crop cultivated worldwide as well as in Pakistan and is known as king of cereals. Due to its compatibility with wide-ranging climatic and soil conditions, it is being cultivated on large area around the global [1]. It has significant contribution in economic share as it accounts 1.9% share in GDP of Pakistan with 9.6% of value addition [2]. Also, it has the highest cropping area in the field crops with about 9.052 million ha grown in Pakistan.

Recent climate change is becoming a major threat for crop production due to its unprecedented behavior with more devastating effects in semi-arid tropics [3]. Climatic condition is to what extent and where wheat can be cultivated economically to feed the ever-increasing population. Water shortage is single most threatening factors for crops cultivation in most parts of world [4]. This situation is getting worse gradually and water shortage is predicted to enhance by 32% up to 2050 [5]coupled with climatic projections [6]. Pakistan is facing acute irrigation water shortage, which is very detrimental for crop production [7]. Growth, yield and quality of wheat grains are markedly influenced by climatic conditions [8]. Drought events and water scarcity reduce the area under wheat cultivation from 9.23 mha in 2016 to 9.0 mha in 2017 [2]. In Pakistan, wheat crop faces water deficit in December and January due to seasonal canal closure. This water drought requires re-scheduling of irrigation that may compensate the water stress with compromising grain yield [9].

Critical stages of wheat under water stress are booting, flowering and grain formation under Mediterranean climate [10]. Most critical stage of wheat under drought stress is grain-filling stage, water scarcity at this stage shorten rate of grain-filling, reduced the grain-filling period and ultimately results in yield reduction [11].

Different degrees of water stress affect differently to physiological and metabolic functions of plants such stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate [12]. Drought stress at stem elongation stage results in reduction of spikelet and kernel number significantly [13]. Drought stress after flowering stage negatively correlated with translocation of photosynthates from leaves to grains [10][14]. Water stress significantly reduces wheat yield [15]. The amount of irrigation influences water use efficacy and grain production [16]. Moreover, excessive application of irrigation water may not result in optimal economic output or higher yield. Thus, there is a definite demand for proper irrigation scheduling [17]. Water stress at tillering has shown linear decrease in RUE of cereal crops and deficit at lateral stages does not have significant effect on RUE [18]. Under water shortage, deficit irrigation is considered as suitable technique; it has further various practices such as potential soil moisture deficit approach (difference amongst irrigation plus rainfall and potential evapotranspiration) in which reduced amount of water is applied to crop without having any adverse impacts on crop yield [19]. Basic objective of PSMD is to enhance water productivity [20][21]. Water deficit mostly affects post-tillering phases of wheat than initial period [22]. However, this effect is devastating with lower nitrogen application in the prior stages [23].

Nitrogen is an important nutrient required for plant advancement [24], together with water deficit, deficiency of nitrogen can also reduce grain’s production and quality of crop [25]. Especially availability of water can influence growth and nutrient status in soil and nitrogen utilization from soil and artificial sources [26]. Increase in nitrogen levels enhances the leaf area duration and total dry matter [27][28]. At cellular level, nitrogen enhances the size and number of cells, improves the radiation absorption efficiency and enhances plant’s leaf area index [29]. In semi-arid and arid tropics wheat production greatly depends upon nitrogen application [30][31].

Nitrogen uptake and utilization by plants and wheat are determined by factors including the activity and length of the root system, the nitrate uptake intensity, nitrate reductase activity, sink of grains, N losses due to soil characteristics and leaching and carbohydrate production [32]. Nitrogen content in leaves cell governs photosynthetic capacity of leaves, determination of Carbohydrate metabolism [33]and nitrogen uptake estimation can be evaluated by chlorophyll quantity [34][35].

In semi-arid areas, mineralization of nitrogen is not adequate for cereals requirement while use of appropriate amount of nitrogen is mandatory for higher outputs [36]. Appropriate amount of application of nitrogen in dry land areas can enhance ability of plant to overcome water deficit stress [37]. Improved grain quality [38]and augmented grain yield of wheat was observed with increasing quantity of nitrogen [39]. Emam et al. [40]investigated that by increasing level of nitrogen in rainfed conditions, yield of wheat increased. Environmental protection and farm profitability can be achieved by appropriate use of nitrogen [41]. Positive effect on RUE of wheat was observed with optimum dose of nitrogen [42].

Thus, there is need to introduce new management strategies that can decrease the chance of drought and utilize the available irrigation water in efficiently [43]. It is needed to evolve new irrigation methods to enhance water use efficiency and productivity [44]. Therefore, current study was carried out to determine the suitable combination of potential soil moisture deficit and nitrogen, to obtain higher and economic wheat production.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Location and Soil

A field trial was carried out at student farm, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (31˚25' North latitude and 73˚08' East longitude, with semi-arid environment). Before sowing, soil samples from depth of 0 - 15 and 15 - 30 cm were collected randomly from experimental area for soil analysis. Report of physico-chemical properties of soil was obtained from Soil Fertility Research Institute, Lahore (Table 1). Climatic condition of the experimental site for the duration of study is represented in (Figure 1).

2.2. Plant Material and Seed Bed Preparation

Galaxy-2013 cultivar of wheat was acquired from Ayub Agriculture Research Institute, Faisalabad. Seed bed was prepared by rotavating followed by two ploughings and planking to pulverize the soil. Line sowing was done with hand drill while maintaining 22.5 cm distance between rows using seed rate of 125 kg・ha−1.

2.3. Experimental Treatments and Design

Trial was arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with split-plot arrangement and replicated thrice. There were two factors studied in the experiment. Factor which was randomized in main plot comprised of three levels of

Table 1. Results of soil analysis.

Figure 1. Meteorological data for cropping season (2015) University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.

potential soil moisture deficit (PSMD), i.e. I1 = 50 mm PSMD, I2 = 75 mm PSMD and I3 = 100 mm PSMD. While, factor randomized in sub plot consist of four levels of nitrogen, i.e. control (No nitrogen), 50, 100 and 150 kg N ha−1 Total number of experimental plots was 36, as set of 12 treatments was replicated thrice.

2.4. Irrigation and Water Management

Canal water as well as tube well water was available to irrigate the experimental unit according to treatment requirement. Soil moisture status was monitored by using tensiometers. Nitrogen fertilizer application was done according to respective treatment in each experimental unit. While recommended dose of Phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) were applied immediately at the time of sowing. The sources of fertilizers were urea, single super phosphate and murate of potash for N, P and K respectively.

2.5. Measurements and Statistical Analysis

A standard model “CROPWAT” was applied to calculate penman potential evapotranspiration (PET). it was developed by Food and Agriculture Organization [45]. It computes the total amount of irrigation water applied to crop is equal to difference between summation of irrigation and precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET).

D = E T o ( I + R )

ETo can be calculated by following formula.

E T o = E p a n × K p

Epan = mean daily pan evaporation, Kp = pan coefficient.

Water stress was imposed on crop in early, middle and terminal stages of crop development and was continued for varying degree of time. Irrigations were applied at 50, 75 and 100 mm PSMD. Calculation of amount of water per are shown as under.

Irrigation depth = 50 mm = 0.05 m;

Area of net plot = 4.5 m × 1.5 m = 6.75 m2;

As we know that, 1 m3 = 1000 liters;

Irrigation for 50 mm (depth) = 337.5 liters;

Diameter of fountain (d) = 0.24 m;

Radius of fountain (r) = 0.12 m;

Fountain length = 25 cm = 0.25 m;

Fountain total area (π r2) = 0.045 m2;

Fountain total volume = A × L = 0.01125 m3;

Required volume of irrigation water = 0.337 m3;

Total fountain buckets needed for 50 mm PSMD=Required volume of irrigation water/total volume of fountain = 0.337/0.01125 = 30.

To maintain 50 mm PSMD per plot 30 fountain buckets were used.

Similarly, 45 fountain buckets for 75 mm PSMD and 60 buckets for 100 mm PSMD per plot were used.

Soil water content = ( W 1 W 2 / W 2 ) × 100 where W1 = Mass of soil before drying and W2 = Mass of soil after drying.

Observation regarding productive tillers, plant height, grains・spike−1, test weight, economic yield and total biomass accumulation were recorded according to standard criterion. While radiation using efficiency for total dry matter was computed as (RUETDM): TDM/ΣSa, while, for grain yield was calculated as (RUEGY) = Grain yield/ΣSa.

Here TDM = total dry matter, Sa is equal to amount of intercepted photo synthetically active radiations (PAR) [46], as it can be calculated by multiplying Fi with Si, where “Fi” is fraction of intercepted radiations and “Si” is daily incident photosynthetically active radiation

S a = F i × S i

here “Fi” can be calculated by Beer’s law

F i = 1 e x p ( k × L A I )

K is a coefficient whose value for wheat is 0.4. Furthermore, for calculation of “Si” there is need to calculate solar radiations

S i = Total R s / 2

Rs is equal to solar radiations that can be calculated by

R s = [ a + b ( n / N ) ] × R a

where, a and b are constants and have 0.25 and 0.5 values respectively, n is equal to actual sunshine hours whereas N is maximum possible sunshine hours and Ra is extra-terrestrial radiations. All recorded data was statistically analyzed by using fisher analysis of variance technique and difference among treatment’s means was compared by least significance difference test at 5% level of probability [47].

3. Results and Discussion

The statistical analysis of the experiment representing the effect of different levels of Nitrogen and PSMD on the height of plant, productive tillers, numbers of grains・spike−1, test weight, radiation use efficiency, total dry matter accumulation and economic yield is representing in Table 2. The effect of PSMD and nitrogen levels is represented in Table 3, while, interactive effects of PSMD and nitrogen levels on these parameters is represented in Table 4.

3.1. Plant Height

The statistical data concerning about the height of plant as affected by different levels of irrigations and different levels of nitrogen is shown in (Table 3). Study has shown that plant height influenced significantly due to different irrigation timing in addition to different delta of water. Moreover, a significant interaction of irrigation levels and Nitrogen application was also observed (Table 4). The results showed that irrigation level 75 mm PSMD and 150 kg N ha−1 gave the maximum 76.27 cm and 82.27 cm plant height respectively and least plant height 68.77 cm was noted in 100 mm PSMD and control N treatments (N0) gave 59.40 cm plant height. I2 treated plots gave maximum plant height because effective rainfall was maximum and adequate moisture supply was maintained throughout the all growth stages of crop. The results of our experiment are just like with the study of [48][49][50][51]. High dose application of nitrogenous fertilizer increases the vegetative growth vigorously and our result synchronise with the finding of [52][53].

Table 2. The mean squares of moisture deficits and nitrogen treatments regarding yield and yield components of wheat during 2014-15.

Table 3. Response of yield and yield components of wheat to moisture deficits and nitrogen levels during 2014-15.

Means sharing same letters did not differ significantly at P = 0.05. I1: Irrigation at 50 mm potential soil moisture deficit; I2: Irrigation at 75 mm potential soil moisture deficit; I3: Irrigation at 100 mm potential soil moisture deficit; N0: Control (No nitrogen); N1: 50 kg N ha−1; N2: 100 kg N ha−1 and N3: 150 kg N ha−1.

Table 4. The response of yield and yield components of wheat to moisture deficits and nitrogen levels during 2014-15.

(b)The data are presented as the means ± SD; Means sharing same letters did not differ significantly at P = 0.05.

3.2. Productive Tillers m−2

Final economic yield is directly influenced by numbers of spike bearing tillers per unit area and its expresses the importance of productive tillers. In Table 3 data indicate that the PSMD and nitrogen levels and in Table 4 interaction of PSMD and nitrogen levels has significant impact (P > 0.05) on the total number of tillers (productive) per unit area. Maximum productive tillers (320.0) were recorded under 75 mm PSMD and 150 kg N ha−1 (I2 × N3) treatment while, least (184.59) productive tillers were noted in 100 mm PSMD × control (0 N) (I3 × N0) treated plots. Results of our experiment are analogous to those of Nisar et al., [51](2016). Khaliq, [52](1999) reported that productive tillers in a unit area increased significantly with the rising application of nitrogen.

3.3. Grains per Spike and 1000 Grain Weight

Grain per spike were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected by PSMD and nitrogen level (Table 3) while their interactive effect was non-significant (Table 4). Maximum (P ≤ 0.05) grains per spike (44.45) were recorded under 75 mm PSMD irrigation treatments (I2), while, (44.79) when 150 kg N ha−1 treatments (N3) was applied. Least no of grains per spike (40.29) and (39.23) were recorded in I1 (50 mm PSMD) and N0 (0 nitrogen) treated plots. Low level of nitrogen and low PSMD reduced the grains per spike significantly.

In case of 1000 grain test weight PSMD levels and nitrogen level influenced significantly (P ≤ 0.05) (Table 3) but interaction of PSMD levels and nitrogen treatments didn’t affect significantly (Table 4). Highest (45.52 g) 1000 grain weight was recorded under 75 mm PSMD (I2) treatment, while, I3 (100 mm PSMD) produced least test weight (37.39 g). Increasing water application increased grain weight [53][54], but our result contradicts with these studies, judicial application of irrigation increases the total grain weight. This study has shown the same trend as of [51]. More nitrogen application also increased grain weight significantly and highest test weight (45.67 g) was recorded in N3 (150 kg N ha−1) and least (36.63 g) was noted in N0 (control) treatment. These findings are in line with those of [48]. Similar research carried out by Lin et al. [55]and Shao et al. [56]shown that not more than three or four irrigations are necessary for gaining desired outcomes in case of wheat.

3.4. Biological Yield and Economic Yield

Biological yield is defined as “total biomass production per unit area by a crop”. Biological yield depends upon characteristic like plant population in a unit area, height of the plants, total number of grains・spike−1 and test weight of grains. Alteration in any cultural practice, climatic factors or any other factor (fertilization, irrigation and pesticides) reflects alteration in biological produce of crop. The statistical data regarding the influence of irrigation (PSMD) and nitrogen levels on biological yield are presented in Table 3. Data shows that nitrogen levels significantly variate the biological yield as well as irrigation levels also produce significant difference among different treatments, while their interactive effect is non-significant (P ≤ 0.05). Maximum (13.18 t・ha−1) biological yield was attained in the case of I2 (75 mm PSMD) followed by 9.88 t・ha−1 in case of I1 (50 mm PSMD) while, minimum (9.15 t・ha−1) biological yield was recorded under I3 (Irrigation at 100 mm PSMD) treatments. Reasons behind the maximum Biological yield in (I2) was judicial use of irrigation resulted in better germination, proper stand establishment, maximum numbers of tillers per unit area, more plant height, less water stress to crop and higher water use efficiency [57]. Warraich et al. [50]reported that under water stress plants required more energy to extract water low soil moisture status.

The statistical data regarding impact of different nitrogen levels at total dry matter production of wheat are shown in Table 3. Highest biological yield (13.48 t・ha−1) attained from N3 (150 kg N per hectare) after that (11.77 tons per hectare) under N2 (100 kg N per hectare), and least (7.13 t per hectare) biological yield was found in N0 (control) treatments. Hussain, [49](2006) and Ali, [58](2009) observed that total biomass production will increase with increasing nitrogen application. The interaction of two factors was non-significant (P ≤ 0.05) on total biomass production (Table 4).

The pivot point of the research is to maximize the per unit economic yield (grain in case of wheat) to fulfill the human dietary requirement and to ensure food security. That’s why different package of technologies is used to boost the profitability and economics of producers. Economic yield (grain in case of wheat) is product of collective response of yield component (total number of productive tillers unit area−1 × total number of grains・spike−1 × 1000 grain weight). Data about economic yield affected by various PSMD and nitrogen treatments is presented in Table 3. Statistical analysis for grain yield shows that PSMD levels and nitrogen treatment have significant impact. Maximum (5.01 t・ha−1) grain yield was achieved from I2 (75 mm PSMD) followed by grain yield (3.67 t・ha−1) and least (3.26 t・ha−1) from I1 (50 mm PSMD) and I3 (100 mm PSMD), respectively. Appropriate amount and at specific time, application of water increased the yield while un-judicial use or lower use of irrigation both reduced the wheat yield. Excessive irrigation application leads to lodging which ultimately reduced the grain yield. Zhang et al. [59]also declared that judicial application of water is necessary for maximum yield. Bunyolo, [60]stated that wheat yield will increase with increasing irrigation application while Lin, [57]reported that only 4 irrigations at critical growth stages is enough for obtaining economic wheat yield. Mubeen et al. [61]and Zarien et al. [62]findings revealed that judicial application of 4 irrigation at proper time gave maximum yield.

In case of nitrogen application uppermost grain yield (5.50 t・ha−1) was gained from N3 (150 kg N per hectare), followed by 4.53 t per hectare, 3.50 t per hectare and 2.39 t per hectare from treatments N2 (100 kg N per hectare), N1 (50 kg N per hectare) and N0 (control), in that order (Table 3). Interactive effect of these factors did not affect the economic yield (Table 4). Hussain et al. [49]and Ali et al. [58]noticed that rising nitrogen level increases economic yield significantly.

Agarwal and Sinha, [63]stated the harmful effects of water scarcity on the seed yield of wheat. Drought stress before pollination is negatively correlated with seed yield. Demir and Shaw, [64]described that drought stress at pollination stage of maize plant reduced the seed yield up to half. The economic yield of wheat like other crops has constructive responses as chemical fertilizer application increased. Climatic and management practices (crop rotation, watering and drainage) factors are primarily significance in response of field crops to chemical fertilizers [32].

3.5. Radiation Use Efficiency (RUE)

RUE for total dry matter was found to be significantly changed with irrigation and nitrogen levels (Table 3), while their interaction found to be non-significant (Table 4). Regarding PSMD levels, RUE for TDM ranged from 1.68 - 1.86 g・MJ−1 and maximum RUE was found in I2 (50 mm PSMD). Whereas, for nitrogen, it was highest (1. 88 g・MJ−1) in N3 (150 kg N ha−1) and least (1. 62 g・MJ−1) RUE eas observed in N0 (control treatmnet). RUE for grain yield was maximum (0.47 g・MJ−1) in case of I2 (75 mm PSMD) among irrigation regimes and in nitrogen application, RUEGY found be highest (0.47 g・MJ−1) with 150 kg・ha−1 application of nitrogen, while interaction of irrigation and nitrogen levels effect RUE non-significantly. Whitfield, [65]stated RUE of wheat was reduced due to water stress. Calviglia et al. [42]found that RUE can be increased with higher levels of nitrogen but not significantly (P ≤ 0.05).

4. Conclusion

Inadequate irrigation and precipitation limitation during the growth period of wheat hampered the yield and growth, so it is concluded that judicial fertilizer application under adequate PSMD condition can mitigate the yield losses. In case of drought inadequate N application diminishes the produce significantly. At early grain filling stage drought stress and low soil N contents lead to reduced N uptake and diminish the yield. Under such scenario, following yield response curve we can get maximum economic yield.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Cite this paper
Ishfaq, M. , Zulfiqar, U. , Ahmad, M. , Mustafa, C. , Hamed, A. , Aslam, M. and Anjum, M. (2018) Quantification of Radiation Use Efficiency and Yield of Wheat as Influenced by Different Levels of Nitrogen and Water Stress under Semi-Arid Conditions of Faisalabad. Agricultural Sciences, 9, 873-887. doi: 10.4236/as.2018.97060.
References
[1]   Philips, S. and Norton, R. (2012) Global Wheat Production and Fertilizer Use. Journal of Better Crops, 96, 4-6.

[2]   Government of Pakistan (2017) Economic Survey of Pakistan. Economic Advisor`s Wing, Finance Division, Islamabad.

[3]   Beck, E.H., Fettig, S., Knake, C., Hartig, K. and Bhattarai, T. (2007) Specific and Unspecific Responses of Plants to Cold and Drought Stress. Journal of Biosciences, 32, 501-510.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-007-0049-5

[4]   Schiermeier, Q. (2014) The Parched Planet: Water on Tap. Nature, 510, 326-328.
https://doi.org/10.1038/510326a

[5]   Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J.F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S.M. and Toulmin, C. (2010) Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People. Science, 327, 812-818.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383

[6]   De-Wit, M. and Stankiewicz, J. (2006) Changes in Surface Water Supply across Africa with Predicted Climate Change. Science, 31, 1917-1921
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1119929

[7]   Mangan, B.N., Tunio, S.D., Sial, M.A., Abro, S.A. and Rajper, S. (2008) Effect of Drought on Yield and Yield Components of Wheat. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Veterinary Sciences, 24, 14-19.

[8]   Çetin, Ö. and Ögretir, K. (2000) The Effects of Rainfall Distribution and Temperature Changes under Different Irrigation and Nitrogen Levels on Winter Wheat. International Conference: Present and Future Requirements for Agrometeorological Information, Poznan, 11-15 September 2000, 55-68.

[9]   Balasubramaniyan, P. and Palaniappan, S.P. (2001) Principles and Practices of Agronomy. Agrobios Newsletter, Jodhpur.

[10]   García-Del Moral, L.F., Rharrabti, Y., Villegas, D. and Royo, C. (2003) Evaluation of Grain Yield and Its Components in Durum Wheat under Mediterranean Conditions. Agronomy Journal, 95, 266-274.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.0266

[11]   Mohammadi, H. and Moradi, F. (2013) Effects of Plant Growth Regulators on Endogenous Hormones in Two Wheat Cultivars Differing in Kernel Size under Control and Water Stress Conditions. Agriculture & Forestry, 59, 81-94.

[12]   Hongbo, S., Zongsuo, L., Mingan, S., Shimeng, S. and Zanmin, H. (2005) Investigation on Dynamic Changes of Photosynthetic Characteristics of 10 Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes during Two Vegetative Growth Stages at Water Deficits. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 43, 221-227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.05.005

[13]   Shpiler, L. and Blum, A. (1991) Heat Tolerance for Yield and Its Components in Different Wheat Cultivars. Euphytica, 51, 257-263.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039727

[14]   Ilker, E., Tatar, Ö., Tonk, F. and Tosun, A.M. (2011) Determination of Tolerance Level of Some Wheat Genotypes to Post-Anthesis Drought. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 16, 59-63.

[15]   Ma, J., Huang, G.B., Yang, D.L. and Chai, Q. (2014) Dry Matter Remobilization and Compensatory Effects in Various Internodes of Spring Wheat under Water Stress. Crop Sciences, 54, 331-339.
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0141

[16]   Kirda, C., Topcu, S., Cetin, D., Dasgan, H.Y., Kaman, H., Topaloglu, F., Derici, M.R. and Ekici, B. (2007) Prospects of Partial Root Zone Irrigation for Increasing Irrigation Water Use Efficiency of Major Crops in the Mediterranean Region. Annals of Applied Biology, 150, 281-291.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00141.x

[17]   Sun, H.Y., Liu, C.M., Zhang, X.Y., Shen, Y.J. and Zhang, Y.Q. (2006) Effects of Irrigation on Water Balance, Yield and WUE of Winter Wheat in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management Journal, 8, 211-218.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.04.008

[18]   Liu, C.M., Zhang, X.Y. and Zhang, Y.Q. (2002) Determination of Daily Evaporation and Evapotranspiration of Winter Wheat and Maize by Large-Scale Weighting Lysimeter and Microlysimeter. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 111, 109-120.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00015-1

[19]   Bashir, M.U., Wajid, S.A., Ahmad, A. and Iqbal, M. (2016) Potential Soil Moisture Deficit: An Alternative Approach for Irrigation Scheduling in Wheat. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 18, 16-22.
https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0046

[20]   Hou, X., Li, R., Jia, Z., Han, O., Wang, W. and Yang, B. (2012) Effects of Rotational Tillage Practices on Soil Properties, Winter Wheat Yields and Water-Use Efficiency in Semi-Arid Areas of North-West China. Field Crops Research, 129, 7-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.021

[21]   Ahmadi, S.H., Agharezaee, M., Kamgar-Haghighi, A.A. and Sepaskhah, A.R. (2014) Effects of Dynamic and Static Deficit and Partial Root Zone Drying Irrigation Strategies on Yield, Tuber Sizes Distribution, and Water Productivity of Two Field Grown Potato Cultivars. Agricultural Water Management, 134, 126-136.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.11.015

[22]   Kang, Y.H., Wang, R.S., Wan, S.Q., Hu, W., Jiang, S.F. and Liu, S.P. (2012) Effects of Different Water Levels on Cotton Growth and Water Use through Drip Irrigation in an Arid Region with Saline Ground Water of Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 109, 117-126.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.02.013

[23]   Gevrek, M.N. and Atasoy, G.D. (2012) Effects of Post Anthesis Drought on Certain Agronomical Characteristics of Wheat under Two Different Nitrogen Application Conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 17, 19-23.

[24]   Vitousek, P.M. (1994) Beyond Global Warming: Ecology and Global Change. Ecology, 75, 1861-1876.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1941591

[25]   Passioura, J.B. (2002) Review: Environmental Biology and Crop Improvement. Functional Plant Biology, 29, 537-546.
https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02020

[26]   Rezadost, S. and Roshdi, M. (2006) New Cultivar Wheat Reactions towards Insufficient Irrigation Systems. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12, 123-131.

[27]   Yang, J., Zahang, J., Huang, Z., Zhu, Q. and Wang, W. (2001) Remobilization of Carbon Reserves in Response to Water Deficit during Grain Filling of Rice. Field Crops Research, 71, 47-55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00147-2

[28]   Basso, B. and Ritchie, J.T. (2005) Impact of Compost, Manure, and Inorganic Fertilizer on Nitrate Leaching and Yield for a 6-Year Maize-Alfalfa Rotation in Michigan. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Journal, 108, 329-341.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.01.011

[29]   Marbet, R. (2000) Differential Response of Wheat to Tillage Management Systems in a Semi-Arid Area of Morocco. Field Crops Research, 66, 165-174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00074-5

[30]   Ghani, A., Ahmad, A.N. and Sarwar (2000) Interactive Effect of Nitrogen and Water Stress on Nitrogen Content and Grain Yield of Two Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 37, 3-4.

[31]   Semenov, M.A., Jamieson, P.D. and Martre, P. (2007) Deconvoluting Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wheat: A Simulation Study. European Journal of Agronomy, 26, 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.10.009

[32]   Fathi, G., Mcdonald, G. and Lance, R.C.M. (1997) Effects of Post-Anthesis Water Stress on the Yield and Grain Protein Concentration of Barley Grown at the Two Level of Nitrogen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 48, 67-80.
https://doi.org/10.1071/A96046

[33]   Tranaviciene, T., Siksnianiene, J., Urbonaviciute, A., Vaguseviciene, I., Samuoliene, G., Duckovskis, P. and Sliesaravicius, A. (2007) Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizers on Wheat Photosynthetic Pigment and Carbohydrate Contents. Biologia, 53, 80-84.

[34]   Brown, B. (2000) Nitrogen Management for Hard Wheat Protein Enhancement. University of Idaho. Winter Commodity Schools Proceeding, 70-76.
http://www.extension.uidaho.edu/swidaho/Nutrient%20Management/increasing_wheat_protein.htm

[35]   Shangguan, Z.P., Shao, M.A. and Dyckmans, J. (2000) Nitrogen Nutrition and Water Stress Effects on Leaf Photosynthetic Gas Exchange and Water Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 44, 141-149.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(00)00064-2

[36]   Ryan, J., Pala, M., Masri, S., Singh, M. and Harris, H. (2008) Rainfed Wheat-Based Rotations under Mediterranean Conditions: Crop Sequences, Nitrogen Fertilization, and Stubble Grazing in Relation to Grain and Straw Quality. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 112-118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.05.008

[37]   Gwal, H.B., Tiwari, R.J., Jain, R.C. and Prajapati, F.S. (1999) Effect of Different Levels of Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Late Sown Wheat. Rachis Newsletter, 18, 42-44.

[38]   Dandan, L. and Shi, Y. (2013) Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer on Quality and Yield in Winter Wheat. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, 5, 646-649.
https://doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.5.3141

[39]   Asadi, G., Ghorbani, R., Khorramdel, S. and Azizi, G. (2013) Effects of Wheat Straw and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Yield Components of Garlic (Allium sativum L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 4, 157-168.

[40]   Emam, Y. (2011) Cereal Production. 4th Edition, Shiraz Univ. Press, Shiraz, 190 p.

[41]   Makowski, D., Wallach, D. and Meynard, J.M. (1999) Model of Yield, Grain Protein and Residual Mineral Nitrogen Response to Applied Nitrogen for Winter Wheat. Agronomy Journal, 91, 337-385.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1999.00021962009100030005x

[42]   Calviglia, O.P. and Sadras, V.O. (2001) Effect of Nitrogen Supply on Crop Conductance, Water and Radiation Use Efficiency of Wheat. Field Crops Research, 69, 249-266.

[43]   Hamzei, J. and Soltani, J. (2012) Deficit Irrigation of Rapeseed for Water-Saving: Effects on Biomass Accumulation, Light Interception and Radiation Use Efficiency under Different N Rates. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 155, 153-160.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.04.003

[44]   Bodner, G., Nakhforoosh, A. and Kaul, H.P. (2015) Management of Crop Water under Drought: A Review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35, 401-442.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0283-4

[45]   FAO (1993) CLIMWAT for CROPWAT: A Climatic Database for Irrigation Planning and Management. Irrigation and Drainage Developed by: Martin Smith. Food and Agric. Organization of the U.N. Rome.

[46]   Khaliq, T., Ahmad, A., Hussain, A., Ranjha, A.M. and Ali, M.A. (2008) Impact of Nitrogen Rates on Growth, Yield, and Radiation Use Efficiency of Maize under Varying Environments. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 45, 1-7.

[47]   Steel, R., Torrie, J.H. and Dickey, D. (1997) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill, New York.

[48]   Ali, H., Randhawa, S.A. and Yousaf, M. (2003) Quantitative and Qualitative Traits of Wheat as Influenced by Planting Dates and Nitrogen Application. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 6, 410-412.

[49]   Hussain, I., Khan, M.A. and Khan, E.A. (2006) Bread Wheat Varieties as Influenced by Different Nitrogen Levels. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 7, 70-78.
https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2006.B0070

[50]   Warraich, E.A., Ahmed, R. and Ashraf, M.Y. (2011) Role of Mineral Nutrition in Alleviation of Drought Stress in Plants. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 764-777.

[51]   Nisar, A.S., Soomro, A.F., Samo, H.A. and Depar, M.S. (2016) Growth and Yield Comparisons of Four Commercial Wheat Varieties to Irrigation Frequencies. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 29, 212-217.

[52]   Khaliq, A., Iqbal, M. and Basra, S.M.A. (1999) Optimization of Seeding Density and Nitrogen Application in Wheat cv. Inqlab-91 under Faisalabad Conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 1, 241-243.

[53]   Maqsood, M., Ali, A., Aslam, Z., Saeed, M. and Ahmad, S. (2002) Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen Levels on Grain Yield and Quality of Wheat. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 4, 164-165.

[54]   Zhang, B., Li, F. and Cheng, Z. (2004) Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Soil Moisture in Intercropped Maize under Deficit Irrigation with Rainfall Harvesting. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 23, 49-51.

[55]   Lin, L., Xu, B.C. and Li, F.M. (2007) Effects of Limited Irrigation on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Two Sequence-Replaced Winter Wheat in Loess Plateau, China. African Journal of Biotechnology, 6, 1493-1497.

[56]   Shao, L., Zhang, X., Chen, S., Sun, H. and Wang, Z. (2009) Effects of Irrigation Frequency under Limited Irrigation on Root Water Uptake, Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 58, 393-405.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.442

[57]   Kilic, H. (2010) The Effect of Planting Methods on Yield and Yield Components of Irrigated Spring Durum Wheat Varieties. Science Research, 5, 3063-3069.

[58]   Ali, M.A., Aslam, M., Hammad, H.M., Abbas, G., Akram, M. and Ali, Z. (2009) Effect of Nitrogen Application Timings on Wheat Yield under Thal Environment. Journal of Agricultural Research, 47, 31-35.

[59]   Zhang, X., Han, H., Ning, L.T., Shan, Y. and Bai, M. (2008) Radiation Use Efficiency and Yield of Winter Wheat under Deficit Irrigation in North China. Journal of Plant Soil and Environment, 54, 313-319.
https://doi.org/10.17221/421-PSE

[60]   Bunyolo, K.M. (2000) The Effect of Water and Nitrogen on Wheat Yield on a Zambian Soil II. Evaluation of Irrigation Schedules. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 16, 43-53.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628509367586

[61]   Mubeen, M., Ahmad, A., Khaliq, T., Sultana, S., Hussain, S., Ali, A., Ali, H. and Nasim, W. (2013) Effect of Growth Stage Based Irrigation Schedules on Biomass Accumulation and Resource Use Efficiency of Wheat Cultivars. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 4, 1435-1442.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.47175

[62]   Zarien, A., Abad, H.H.S. and Hamidi, A. (2014) Yield, Yield Components and Some Physiological Traits of Three Wheat Cultivars under Drought Stress and Potassium Foliar Application Treatments. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 4, 168-175.

[63]   Agarwal, P.K. and Sinha, S.K. (1984) Effect of Water Stress on Grain Growth and Assimilate Partitioning in Two Cultivars of Wheat Contrasting in Their Yield Ability in a Drought Environment. Annals of Botany, 53, 329-340.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086697

[64]   Demir, O.T. and Shaw, R.H. (1990) The Effect of Soil Moisture at Different Stage of Growth on the Development and Yield of Corn. Agronomy Journal, 59, 272-277.

[65]   Whitfield, D.M. and Smith, C.J. (1989) Effects of Irrigation and Nitrogen on Growth, Light Interception and Efficiency of Light Conversion in Wheat. Field Crops Research, 20, 279-295.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(89)90071-3

 
 
Top