Back
 GEP  Vol.6 No.5 , May 2018
Origins of the Problematic Substances in Fines, for Their Acceptance at Inert Landfills
Abstract: Integrated solid waste management (ISWM) involves approaching solid waste in a comprehensive manner with careful selection of appropriate technology. The aim of good waste management is to push waste up the hierarchy with landfill as a last resort. However given the current sorting technology, heterogeneous residues called Fines are created, they are considered at the present time as non-sortable and non-recoverable sent to second class landfills. A previous conducted study has revealed that fines contain several problematic substances for an inert classification. This article summarizes the most important problematic substances in fines for their acceptance inert landfills. These substances were identified by analyzing several samples collected from a siting of non-hazardous solid waste in the region of Rh&#244ne-Alpes in France. Eluate Analysis and fines analysis were conducted in order to identify the presence of any component that could prevent the classification of fines in an inert landfill. The obtained results were compared with the limit values for waste acceptance in an inert landfill. The study concluded that the six top-ranking problematic substances are Copper, Mercury, Antimony, Chloride, Fluoride and Sulfates, this study gives additional information on the origins of these substances that deserves particular attention to better limit their presence in the input of fines stream.
Cite this paper: Oujana, S. and Sanchez, D. (2018) Origins of the Problematic Substances in Fines, for Their Acceptance at Inert Landfills. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 6, 237-246. doi: 10.4236/gep.2018.65020.
References

[1]   Landfill Waste—Environment—European Commission.
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/landfill_index.htm

[2]   Oluwapelumi and Ojuri, O. (2015) Geotechnical Characterization of Some Clayey Soils for Use as Landfill Liner.
http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/en/Legislation1/Regulations/Waste-Regulations/Chapter-9/

[3]   M&K Group (2015) The Costs of Sending Waste to Landfill. M&K, 28-Sep-2015.

[4]   Eva, B. and Elin, L. (2017) Plug the Marine Litter Tap: A Pilot Study on Potential Marine Litter Sources in Urban Areas. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen.

[5]   Irem, S., Adrian, M.L., Agron, H., Ahmet, C.K., Boban, B., Danijela, D., Desislava, S., Dragan, L., Gani, B., Irina, L. and Miodrag, G. (2014) Report: Benchmarking on Solid Waste Management in South-East Europe 2015. NALAS.

[6]   Hjelmar, O. and Nordic Council of Ministers (2009) Treatment Methods for Waste to be Landfilled. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen.

[7]   Schumacher, B.A. (2002) Methods for the Determination of Total Organic, Carbon(TOC) in Soils and Sediments.

[8]   https://www.dictionnaire-environnement.com/carbone_organique_total_cot_ID719.html

[9]   Michel, L (2010) Arrêté du 28 octobre 2010 relatif aux installations de stockage de déchets inertes.

[10]   Dawson, A. (2008) Water in Road Structures: Movement, Drainage & Effects. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin.

[11]   Science Applications International Corporation Washington State Department of General Administration (2003) An Assessment of Laboratory Leaching Tests for Predicting the Impacts of Fill Material on Ground Water and Surface Water Quality. Washington State Department of Ecology.

[12]   Filella, M., Belzile, N. and Chen, Y.-W. (2002) Antimony in the Environment: A Review Focused on Natural Waters: I. Occurrence. Earth-Science Reviews, 57, 125-176.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(01)00070-8

[13]   Penque, A. (2007) Examination of Chlorides in Municipal Solid Waste to Energy Combustion Residue: Origins, Fate and Potential for Treatment. Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering Fu Foundation of Engineering and Applied Science, Columbia.

[14]   Coruh, S., Ergun, O.N. and Cheng, T.-W. (2006) Treatment of Copper Industry Waste and Production of Sintered Glass-Ceramic. Waste Manag. Res. J. Int. Solid Wastes Public Clean. Assoc. ISWA, 24, 234-241.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X06062600

[15]   Cheng, H. and Hu, Y. (2012) Mercury in Municipal Solid Waste in China and Its Control: A Review. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 593-605.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es2026517

[16]   (2018) Mercury Retort and Processing Waste Management.
https://www.wmsolutions.com/solutions/mercury-processing/

[17]   Mukherjee, A.B., Zevenhoven, R., Brodersen, J., Hylander, L.D. and Bhattacharya, P. (2004) Mercury in Waste in the European Union: Sources, Disposal Methods and Risks. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 42, 155-182.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.02.009

[18]   Lehmphul, K. (2014) Waste Containing Mercury. Umweltbundesamt.
http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/topics/waste-resources/waste-management/
waste-types/hazardous-waste/waste-containing-mercury


 
 
Top