Back
 Health  Vol.10 No.5 , May 2018
Risk of Hearing Loss Caused by Multiple Acoustic Impulses in the Framework of Biovariability
Abstract: We consider the hearing loss injury among subjects in a crowd with a wide spectrum of individual intrinsic injury probabilities due to biovariability. For multiple acoustic impulses, the observed injury risk of a crowd vs the effective combined dose follows the logistic dose-response relation. The injury risk of a crowd is the average fraction of injured. The injury risk was measured in experiments as follows: each subject is individually exposed to a sequence of acoustic impulses of a given intensity and the injury is recorded; results of multiple individual subjects were assembled into data sets to mimic the response of a crowd. The effective combined dose was adjusted by varying the number of impulses in the sequence. The most prominent feature observed in experiments is that the injury risk of the crowd caused by multiple impulses is significantly less than the value predicted based on assumption that all impulses act independently in causing injury and all subjects in the crowd are statistically identical. Previously, in the case where all subjects are statistically identical (i.e., no biovariability), we interpreted the observed injury risk caused by multiple impulses in terms of the immunity effects of preceding impulses on subsequent impulses. In this study, we focus on the case where all sound exposure events act independently in causing injury regardless of whether one is preceded by another (i.e., no immunity effect). Instead, we explore the possibility of interpreting the observed logistic dose-response relation in the framework of biovariability of the crowd. Here biovariability means that subjects in the crowd have their own individual injury probabilities. That is, some subjects are biologically less or more susceptible to hearing loss injury than others. We derive analytically the distribution of individual injury probability that produces the observed logistic dose-response relation. For several parameter values, we prove that the derived distribution is mathematically a proper density function. We further study the asymptotic approximations for the density function and discuss their significance in practical numerical computation with finite precision arithmetic. Our mathematical analysis implies that the observed logistic dose-response relation can be theoretically explained in the framework of biovariability in the absence of immunity effect.
Cite this paper: Wang, H. , A. Burgei, W. and Zhou, H. (2018) Risk of Hearing Loss Caused by Multiple Acoustic Impulses in the Framework of Biovariability. Health, 10, 604-628. doi: 10.4236/health.2018.105048.
References

[1]   Glodsmith, W. (2015) Sound: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198708445.001.0001

[2]   Kramer, S. and Brown, D.K. (2018) Audiology: Science to Practice. 3rd Edition, Plural Publishing, San Diego.

[3]   Chan, P., Ho, K. and Ryan, A.F. (2016) Impulse Noise Injury Model. Military Medicine, 181, 59-69.
https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00139

[4]   Hamernik, R.P., Patterson, J.H., Ahroon, W.A. and Stuhmiller, J.H. (1998) A Health Hazard Assessment for Blast Overpressure Exposures Subtitle-Use of Animal Test Data in the Development of a Human Auditory Hazard Criterion for Impulse Noise (Part 1). Auditory Research Laboratory, State University of New York at Plattsburgh, Fort Detrick. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a393522.pdf

[5]   Hamernik, R.P., Patterson, J.H., Ahroon, W.A. and Stuhmiller, J.H. (1998) A Health Hazard Assessment for Blast Overpressure Exposures Subtitle-Use of Animal Test Data in the Development of a Human Auditory Hazard Criterion for Impulse Noise (Part 2). Auditory Research Laboratory, State University of New York at Plattsburgh, Fort Detrick. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a392410.pdf

[6]   Wang, H., Burgei, W.A. and Zhou, H. (2017) Interpreting Dose-Response Relation for Exposure to Multiple Sound Impulses in the Framework of Immunity. Health, 9, 1817-1842. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2017.913132

[7]   https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/biological+variability

[8]   Murphy, W.J., Khan, A. and Shaw, P.B. (2011) Analysis of Chinchilla Temporary and Permanent Threshold Shifts Following Impulsive Noise Exposure. EPHB Report 338-05c, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati.
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/surveyreports/pdfs/338-05c.pdf

[9]   Weightman, F.L., Flamme, G., Campenella, A.J. and Luz, G.A. (2010) American Institute of Biological Sciences Peer Review of Injury Prevention and Reduction Research Task Area-Impulse Noise Injury Models.
http://www.arl.army.mil/www/pages/343/AHAAH_AIBS_revew_Public_Release_11Aug14.pdf

[10]   Bush, A.W. (1992) Perturbation Methods for Engineers and Scientists. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

[11]   Hinch, E.J. (1991) Perturbation Methods. Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172189

 
 
Top