ABSTRACT It has been proposed that imitation in children is strongly affected by goals extracted from others’ movements. More specifically, imitation-specific goal selection, or a tendency that movement outcomes, rather than means, are more likely to be selected as goals, has been proposed. Conversely, research on imitation in adults has proposed the generalist hypothesis, or the hypothesis that relatively dominant characteristics in movements are simply selected as goals, in the recent years. The present study tested the validity of imitation-specific goal selection with 64 children (M age = 5.2, age range: 4.1 - 6.0) using tasks that were similar to those used in research on imitation in adults. Movements composed of four elements were presented, and errors were analyzed by component. In this process, coloring emphasized one of the four elements, and presentation order of the elements was changed. Results suggested that relatively accentuating a specific element by coloring reduced the errors on the element. In the control condition in which coloring was not applied, the fewest errors were for means. Overall, the results did not support validity of imitation-specific goal selection in children, indicative of the validity the generalist hypothesis.
Cite this paper
nullMizuguchi, T. , Sugimura, R. , Suzuki, R. & Deguchi, T. (2011). Children’s Imitation is Affected by Goals, but the Goals are Outstanding Action Characteristics rather than Action Outcomes. Psychology, 2, 869-874. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.28132.
 Bekkering, H., Wohlschl?ger, A., & Gattis, M. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 153-164.
 Bird, G., Brindley, R., Leighton, J., & Heyes, C. (2007). General processes, rather than “Goals”, explain imitation errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 33, 1158-1169. doi:10.1037/0096-1522.214.171.1248
 Gattis, M., Bekkering, H., & Wohlschl?ger, A. (2002). Goal-directed imitation. In A. N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 183-205
 Gleissner, B., Meltzoff, A. N., & Bekkering, H. (2000). Children’s coding of human action: Cognitive factors influencing imitation in 3- year-olds. Developmental Science, 3, 405-414.
 Leighton, J., Bird, G., & Heyes, C. (2010). ‘Goals’ are not an integral component of imitation. Cognition, 114, 423-435.
 Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179-192.
 Meltzoff, A. N. (2002). Elements of a developmental theory of imitation. In A. N. Meltzoff and W. Prinz (Eds), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 19-41.
 Mizuguchi, T., Sugimura, R., & Deguchi, T. (2009). Children’s imitations of movements are goal-directed and context-specific. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108, 513-523. doi:10.2466/pms.108.2.513-523
 Mizuguchi, T., Suzuki, R., Sugimura, R., & Deguchi, T. (2010). Imitation of modeled manipulation of objects by children and adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110, 603-612.
 Perra, O., Gattis, M. (2008). Reducing the mapping between perception and action facilitates imitation. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 133-144. doi:10.1348/026151007X224442
 Rumiati, R. I., & Bekkering, H. (2003). To imitate or not to imitate? How the brain can do it, that is the question! Brain and Cognition, 53, 479-482. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00208-2
 Rumiati, R. I., & Tessari, A., (2002). Imitation of novel and well- known actions: the role of short-term memory. Experimental Brain Ressearch, 142, 425-433. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1070-4
 Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., & Ratner, H. H. (1993). Cultural Learning. Behavioral and Brain Science, 16, 495-552.
 Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
 Williamson, R. A., & Markman, E. M. (2006). Precision of imitation as a function of preschoolers’ understanding of the goal of the demonstaration. Developmental Psychology, 42, 723-731.
 Williamson, R. A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Markman, E. M. (2008). Prior experiences and perceived efficacy influence 3-year-olds’ imitation. Developmental Psychology, 44, 275-285.
 Wohlschl?ger, A., Garris, M., & Bekkering, H. (2003). Action generation and action perception in imitation: An instance of the ideomotor principle. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 358, 501- 515. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1257