Application of Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova Theory (BFO Theory) and Modigliani-Miller Theory (MM Theory) in Rating

Affiliation(s)

^{1}
Department of Data Analysis, Decision Making, and Financial Technology, Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

^{2}
Department of Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance, Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

^{3}
High Business School, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.

^{4}
Department of Management, Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

ABSTRACT

The paper is devoted to application of Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova theory (BFO theory) and Modigliani-Miller theory (MM theory) in rating. A serious modification of both theories in order to use them in rating procedure has been required. The financial “ratios” (main rating parameters) were introduced into both these theories. The necessity of an appropriate use of financial flows discounting in rating methodologies is discussed. The dependence of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which plays the role of discount rate, on coverage and leverage ratios is analyzed. The use of BFO theory allows applying obtained results for real economics, for companies with finite lifetime, introduce a factor of time into theory, estimate the creditworthiness of companies of arbitrary lifetime (or arbitrary age), introduce the financial flows discounting, using the correct discount rate etc. Obtained results made possible to use the power of these theories in the rating and create a new base for rating methodologies, by other words this allows develop a new approach to methodology of rating, requiring a serious modification of existing rating methodologies. The article is organized as follows: In Section 2, we modify for the first time the Modigliani-Miller theory (perpetuity limit of BFO theory) for rating needs and introduce the financial “ratios” (a direct and inverse) into this theory. As well we analyze here the dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratios and on the leverage ones. In Section 3, we discuss the method of evaluation of the discount rate with using one or a few financial “ratios”. In Section 4, the conclusions concerning the application of perpetuity limit of the modern theory of capital structure—BFO theory (MM theory) in rating have been done. In Section 5, we modify for the first time the general version of BFO theory (for companies of arbitrary age) for rating needs and introduce the financial “ratios” (a direct and inverse) into this theory. Here we as well analyze the dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratios and on the leverage ones. We make calculations for two company ages (three and five years) in order to demonstrate that developed approach could be applied for companies of arbitrary age and to have a possibility to compare results for companies of different ages. Section 6 is devoted to conclusions made by the analysis of obtained results. Application of developed methods to rating is discussed here as well as completely new horizons which are opening in the rating industry via this investigation.

The paper is devoted to application of Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova theory (BFO theory) and Modigliani-Miller theory (MM theory) in rating. A serious modification of both theories in order to use them in rating procedure has been required. The financial “ratios” (main rating parameters) were introduced into both these theories. The necessity of an appropriate use of financial flows discounting in rating methodologies is discussed. The dependence of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which plays the role of discount rate, on coverage and leverage ratios is analyzed. The use of BFO theory allows applying obtained results for real economics, for companies with finite lifetime, introduce a factor of time into theory, estimate the creditworthiness of companies of arbitrary lifetime (or arbitrary age), introduce the financial flows discounting, using the correct discount rate etc. Obtained results made possible to use the power of these theories in the rating and create a new base for rating methodologies, by other words this allows develop a new approach to methodology of rating, requiring a serious modification of existing rating methodologies. The article is organized as follows: In Section 2, we modify for the first time the Modigliani-Miller theory (perpetuity limit of BFO theory) for rating needs and introduce the financial “ratios” (a direct and inverse) into this theory. As well we analyze here the dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratios and on the leverage ones. In Section 3, we discuss the method of evaluation of the discount rate with using one or a few financial “ratios”. In Section 4, the conclusions concerning the application of perpetuity limit of the modern theory of capital structure—BFO theory (MM theory) in rating have been done. In Section 5, we modify for the first time the general version of BFO theory (for companies of arbitrary age) for rating needs and introduce the financial “ratios” (a direct and inverse) into this theory. Here we as well analyze the dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratios and on the leverage ones. We make calculations for two company ages (three and five years) in order to demonstrate that developed approach could be applied for companies of arbitrary age and to have a possibility to compare results for companies of different ages. Section 6 is devoted to conclusions made by the analysis of obtained results. Application of developed methods to rating is discussed here as well as completely new horizons which are opening in the rating industry via this investigation.

KEYWORDS

Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova Theory, Modigliani-Miller Theory, Rating, Rating Methodology, Coverage Ratios, Leverage Ratios, Discounting of Financial Flows, Discount Rate

Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova Theory, Modigliani-Miller Theory, Rating, Rating Methodology, Coverage Ratios, Leverage Ratios, Discounting of Financial Flows, Discount Rate

1. Introduction

While the role of rating agencies in economics is very important (generated by them credit ratings of issuers help to investors make reasonable investment decision, help issuers with good enough ratings get credits on lower rates etc.) there are a lot of shortcomings in their activity.

Among them:

1) Closeness of rating agencies,

2) A failure or a very narrow use of discounting of financial flows (even in those rare cases where it is used, it is used with the incorrect discount rate),

3) The existing accounting of industry specifics of issuer is clearly insufficient,

4) Accounting of the particularities of the issuer, features of financial reports, taxation, legal and financial system is neglected in favor of achieving full comparability of financial reports,

5) Some financial ratios define ambiguously the state of the issuer,

6) Possibility of a formal hit of individual characteristics of factor/subfactor simultaneously in several categories of evaluation, particularly for qualitative factors, in this case, the score is based on expert opinion,

7) The formalization of expert opinions, which is one of the most important tasks in improving of the rating methodology, is far from its solution,

8) etc.

In this paper, we develop a new approach to rating methodology introducing an appropriate discounting of financial flows, describing the method of evaluation of the correct discount rate when discounting financial flows, introducing the financial “ratios” (main rating parameters) into modern theory of capital cost and capital structure―BFO theory [1] - [16] ―and its perpetuity limit―MM theory [17] [18] [19] ―and using the power of these theories in the rating methodology. As well we study the dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital, WACC, on the financial ratios, which allow evaluate the correct discount rate with accounting of the financial ratios.

The account of the time factor in terms of discounting is obvious, because it is connected with the time value of money. The financial part of the rating assessment of creditworthiness of issuers is based on a comparison of generated income with the value of the debt and the interest payable. Because income and disbursement of debt and interest are separated in time, the use of discounting when comparing revenues with the value of debt and interest is absolutely necessary for assigning credit ratings for issuers.

This raises the question about the value of discount rate. This question has always been one of the major and extremely difficult in many areas of finance: corporate finance, investment, it is particularly important in business valuation, where a slight change in the discount rate leads to a significant change in the assessment of company capitalization, that is used by unscrupulous appraisers for artificial bankruptcy of the company. And the value of discount rate is extremely essential as well in rating. And there is only one theory, which allow evaluate the correct discount rates (the weighted average cost of capital WACC and equity cost of capital k_{e})―the modern theory of capital structure by Brusov-Filatova- Orekhova [1] - [16] . But we start from its perpetuity limit―Modigliani-Miller theory [17] [18] [19] for simplicity.

The main contributions of this paper is the application of Brusov-Filatova- Orekhova theory (BFO theory) [1] - [16] and Modigliani-Miller theory (MM theory) [17] [18] [19] in rating. A serious modification of both theories for rating procedure has been required. For the first time the introduction of the financial “ratios” (a direct and inverse) into these theories has been done. As well we study the dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratios and on the leverage ones. The use of BFO theory allows applying obtained results for real economics, where all companies have finite lifetime, introduce a factor of time into theory, estimate the creditworthiness of companies of arbitrary age (or arbitrary lifetime), introduce discounting of the financial flows, using the correct discount rate etc. Use of the tools of well developed theories in rating opens completely new horizons in the rating industry, which could go from the mainly use of qualitative methods of the evaluation of the creditworthiness of issuers to a predominantly quantitative evaluation methods that will certainly enhance the quality and correctness of the rating.

2. Modification of Modigliani-Miller Theory for Rating Needs

The financial “ratios”, constitute a direct and inverse ratios of various generated cash flows to debt values and interest ones, play quite significant role in quantification of the creditworthiness of the issuers. The examples of such ratios are as following: DCF/Debt, FFO/Debt, CFO/Debt, FOCF/Debt, FFO/cash interest, EBITDA/interest, Interests/EBITDA, Debt/EBITDA and some others.

We introduce these financial “ratios” into the perpetuity limit of modern theory of capital structure―BFO theory and then into the general version of BFO theory (for companies of arbitrary age). This is quite important because allows use this theory as a powerful tools when discounting of financial flows using the correct discounting rate in rating.

This has required the modification of the BFO theory and its perpetuity limit ―Modigliani-Miller theory. The needs of modification is connected to the fact that used in financial management the concept of “leverage” as the ratio of debt value to the equity value substantially differs from the concept of “leverage” in the rating, where it is understood as ratio of the debt value to the generated cash flow values (income, profit, etc.).

Modigliani-Miller theory with corporate taxes [17] [18] [19] shows that capitalization of financially dependent (leveraged) company, V_{L}, is equal to the capitalization of financially independent (unleveraged) company, V_{0} , increased by the size of the tax shield for perpetuity time, Dt,

${V}_{L}={V}_{0}+Dt$ . (1)

Substituting the expressions for both capitalizations, one has

$\frac{CF}{WACC}=\frac{CF}{{k}_{0}}+Dt$ (2)

Let us now introduce the parameters, using in ratings, into Modigliani-Miller theory, which represents a perpetuity limit of modern theory of capital structure by Brusov-Filatova-Orekhovatheory (BFO theory) [1] - [16] .

Two kind of financial ratios will be considered: coverage ratios and leverage ratios.

We will start from the coverage ratios.

2.1. Coverage Ratios

We will consider three kind of coverage ratios: coverage ratio of debt, coverage ratio of interest on the credit and coverage ratio of debt and interest on the credit.

2.1.1. Coverage Ratios of Debt

Let us consider first the coverage ratios of debt ${i}_{1}=CF/D$ .

Dividing both parts of Equation (2) by Done gets

$\begin{array}{l}\frac{{i}_{1}}{WACC}=\frac{{i}_{1}}{{k}_{0}}+t\\ WACC=\frac{{i}_{1}{k}_{0}}{{i}_{1}+t{k}_{0}}\end{array}$ (3)

The coverage ratio of debt
${i}_{1}=CF/D$ could be used for assessment of the following rating ratios: DCF/Debt, FFO/Debt, CFO/Debt, FOCF/Debt and some others. Formula (3) will be used to find a dependence WACC(i_{1}).

2.1.2. Coverage Ratios of Interest on the Credit

Consider now coverage ratio of interest on the credit ${i}_{2}=CF/{k}_{d}D$ .

By use of the Modigliani-Miller theory for case with corporate taxes

${V}_{L}={V}_{0}+Dt$ ,

one could derive the expression for WACC(i_{2})

$\begin{array}{l}\frac{CF}{WACC}=\frac{CF}{{k}_{0}}+Dt\\ \frac{{i}_{2}}{WACC}=\frac{{i}_{2}}{{k}_{0}}+\frac{{i}_{2}}{{k}_{d}}\\ WACC=\frac{{i}_{2}{k}_{0}{k}_{d}}{{i}_{2}{k}_{d}+t{k}_{0}}\end{array}$ (4)

This ratio (i_{2}) could be used for assessment of the following parameters, used in rating, FFO/cash interest, EBITDA/interest and some others. Formula (4) will be used to find a dependence WACC(i_{2}).

2.1.3. Coverage Ratios of Debt and Interest on the Credit

Below we consider the coverage ratios of debt and interest on the credit

simultaneously ${i}_{3}=\frac{CF}{D\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)}$ . This is a new value, introduced by us here for

the first time. Using the Modigliani-Miller theory for case with corporate taxes

${V}_{L}={V}_{0}+Dt$

we get the dependence WACC(i_{3})

$\begin{array}{l}\frac{CF}{WACC}=\frac{CF}{{k}_{0}}+Dt\\ \frac{{i}_{3}}{WACC}=\frac{{i}_{3}}{{k}_{0}}+\frac{t}{1+{k}_{d}}\\ WACC=\frac{{i}_{3}{k}_{0}\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)}{{i}_{3}\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)+t{k}_{0}}\end{array}$ (5)

This ratio (i_{3}) could be used for assessment of the following rating ratios: FFO/Debt + interest, EBITDA/Debt + interest and some others. Formula (5) will be used to find a dependence WACC(i_{3}).

Let us analyze the dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratios on debt i_{1}, on interest on the credit i_{2} and on coverage ratios on debt and interest on the credit with the following data: k_{0} = 12%; k_{d} = 6%; t = 20%; i_{j} run from 0 up to 10. Results are presented at Figure 1.

The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on debt and interest on the credit i_{2} is presented at Figure 3.

The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on debt i_{1}, on interest on the credit i_{2}, and on debt and interest on the credit i_{3} is presented at Figure 4.

It is seen from the Figures 1-4 that WACC(i_{j}) is increasing function on i_{j} with saturation around i_{j} value of order 1 for ratios i_{1} and i_{3} and of order 4 or 5 for ratios i_{2}. At saturation WACC reaches the value k_{0} (equity value at zero leverage level). This means that for high values of i_{j} one can choose k_{0} as a discount rate with a good accuracy. Thus the role of parameter k_{0} increases drastically. The method of determination of parameter k_{0} has been developed by Anastasiya Brusova [14] . So, parameter k_{0} is the discount rate for limit case of high values of i_{j}.

2.2. Leverage Ratios

We will consider now the leverage ratios. Three kind of leverage ratios will be considered: leverage ratios of debt, leverage ratios of interest on the credit and leverage ratios of debt and interest on the credit.

Figure 1. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on debt i_{1}.

Figure 2. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on interest on the credit i_{2}.

Figure 3. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on debt and interest on the credit i_{3}.

Figure 4. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on debt i_{1}, on interest on the credit i_{2}, and on debt and interest on the credit i_{3}.

2.2.1. Leverage Ratios for Debt

Here ${l}_{1}=D/CF$ (6)

As above for coverage ratios we use the Modigliani-Miller theorem for case with corporate taxes

${V}_{L}={V}_{0}+Dt$ ,

we derive the expression for WACC(l_{1})

$\begin{array}{l}\frac{CF}{WACC}=\frac{CF}{{k}_{0}}+Dt\\ \frac{1}{WACC}=\frac{1}{{k}_{0}}+{l}_{1}t\\ WACC=\frac{{k}_{0}}{1+t{l}_{1}{k}_{0}}\end{array}$ (7)

This ratio (l_{1}) can be used to assess of the following parameters used in rating, Debt/EBITDA and some others. We will use last formula to build a curve of dependence WACC(l_{1}).

2.2.2. Leverage Ratios for Interest on Credit

Here ${l}_{2}={k}_{d}D/CF$ (8)

We use again the Modigliani-Miller theorem for case with corporate taxes

${V}_{L}={V}_{0}+Dt$ ,

we derive the expression for WACC(l_{2})

$\begin{array}{l}\frac{CF}{WACC}=\frac{CF}{{k}_{0}}+Dt\\ \frac{1}{WACC}=\frac{1}{{k}_{0}}+\frac{{l}_{2}t}{{k}_{d}}\\ WACC=\frac{{k}_{0}{k}_{d}}{{k}_{d}+t{l}_{2}{k}_{0}}\end{array}$ (9)

This ratio (l_{2}) can be used to assess of the following parameters used in rating, Interests/EBITDA and some others. We will use last formula to build a curve of dependence WACC (l_{2}).

2.2.3. Leverage Ratios for Debt and Interest on Credit

Here ${l}_{3}=D\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)/CF$ (10)

Using the Modigliani-Miller theorem for case with corporate taxes

${V}_{L}={V}_{0}+Dt$ ,

we derive the expression for WACC(l_{3})

$\begin{array}{l}\frac{CF}{WACC}=\frac{CF}{{k}_{0}}+Dt\\ \frac{1}{WACC}=\frac{1}{{k}_{0}}+\frac{{l}_{3}t}{1+{k}_{d}}\\ WACC=\frac{{k}_{0}\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)}{1+{k}_{d}+t{l}_{3}{k}_{0}}\end{array}$ (11)

This ratio (l_{3}) can be used to assess of the following parameters used in rating, Debt + interest/FFO, Debt + interest/EBIT, Debt + interest/EBITDA (R), and some others. We will use last formula to build a curve of dependence WACC(l_{3}).

Let us analyze the dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the leverage ratios with the following data: k_{0} = 12%; k_{d} = 6%; t = 20%; l_{i} runs from 0 up to 10. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the leverage ratio on debt l_{1} is presented at Figure 5.

The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the leverage ratio on interest on credit l_{2}is presented at Figure 6.

The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the leverage ratio on debt and interest on credit l_{3} is presented at Figure 7.

Figure 5. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the leverage ratio on debt l_{1}.

Figure 6. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the leverage ratio on interest on credit l_{2}.

Figure 7. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the leverage ratio on debt and interest on credit l_{3}.

The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the leverage ratio on debt, l_{1}, on interest on credit, l_{2}, and on debt and interest on credit, l_{3} simultaneously is presented at Figure 8.

Figure 8. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the leverage ratio on debt, l_{1}, on interest on credit, l_{2}, and on debt and on interest on credit, l_{3} simultaneously.

Analysis of the dependences of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the leverage ratio on debt, l_{1}, on interest on credit, l_{2}, and on debt and interest on credit, l_{3} shows the following: for all leverage ratios weighted average cost of capital (WACC) decreases with leverage ratios. For leverage ratio on debt l_{1} and leverage ratio on debt and interest on credit l_{3} WACC decreases very similar and practically linearly from k_{0} = 12% at l_{1,3} = 0 up to 9.7% at l_{1,3} = 10. For leverage ratio on interest on credit l_{2} WACC decreases nonlinearly and much faster from k_{0} = 12% at l_{2} = 0 up to 2.4% at l_{2} = 10.

3. Method of Evaluation of the Discount Rate

Let us discuss now the algorithm of valuation of the discount rate, if we know one or a few ratios (coverage or leverage ones). The developed above method allow estimate discount rate with the best accuracy characteristic for used theory of capital structure (perpetuity limit).

3.1. Using One Ratio

If one know one ratio (coverage or leverage one) the algorithm of valuation of the discount rate is as following:

1) Determination of the parameter k_{0};

2) Knowing k_{0}, k_{d} and t, one builds the curve of dependence WACC(i) or WACC(l);

3) Then, using the known value of coverage ratio (i_{0}) or leverage ratio (l_{0}) one finds the value WACC(i_{0}) or WACC(l_{0}), which represents the discount rate.

3.2. Using a Few Ratios

If we know say m values of coverage ratios (i_{j}) and n values of leverage ratios (l_{k}):

1) We find by the above algorithm m values of WACC(i_{j}) and n values of WACC(l_{k}) first;

2) Then we find the average value of WACC by the following formula:

$WAC{C}_{av}=\frac{1}{m+n}\left[{\displaystyle \underset{j=1}{\overset{m}{\sum}}WACC\left({i}_{j}\right)+{\displaystyle \underset{k=1}{\overset{n}{\sum}}WACC\left({l}_{k}\right)}}\right]$ .

This found value $WAC{C}_{av}$ should be used when discounting the financial flows in rating.

4. Conclusion

In a first part of paper a new approach to rating methodology has been developed, using the perpetuity limit of the modern theory of capital structure―BFO theory-MM theory [1] - [16] . A new approach is based on two key factors: 1) The adequate use of discounting of financial flows virtually not used in existing rating methodologies, 2) The introduction of financial “ratios” into Modigliani-Miller theory [17] [18] [19] . This allows use the powerful tool of this theory in the rating. Below we’ll consider the application of the modern theory of capital structure―BFO theory (general case of arbitrary age companies) in rating.

5. Modification of the BFO Theory (for Companies of Arbitrary Age) for Rating Needs

We will conduct below the modification of the BFO theory for companies of arbitrary age for rating needs, which proved much more difficult than modification of its (BFO theory) perpetuity limit.

As it turned out, use of the famous BFO formula

$\frac{\left[1-{\left(1+WACC\right)}^{-n}\right]}{WACC}=\frac{\left[1-{\left(1+{k}_{0}\right)}^{-n}\right]}{{k}_{0}\left[1-{\omega}_{d}T\left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)}^{-n}\right)\right]}$ (12)

not possible, since it no longer includes cash flows CF and debt value D, and the leverage level L = D/S (in the same sense as it is used in financial management) is included only through the share of leveraged w_{d} = L/(L + 1).

To modify the general BFO theory for rating needs, one should return to the initial assumptions under the derivation of the BFO formula.

Modigliani-Miller theorem in case of existing of corporate taxes, generalized by us for the case of finite company age, states [17] [18] [19] that capitalization of leveraged company (using the debt financing), V_{L}, is equal to the capitalization of non-leveraged company (which does not use the debt financing), V_{0}, increased by the amount of the tax shield for the finite period of time,
$T{S}_{n}$ ,

${V}_{L}={V}_{0}+T{S}_{n}$ . (13)

where

the capitalization of leveraged company ${V}_{L}=\frac{CF}{WACC}\left(1-{\left(1+WACC\right)}^{-n}\right)$ ; (14)

the capitalization of non-leveraged company

${V}_{0}=\frac{CF}{{k}_{0}}\left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{0}\right)}^{-n}\right)$ ; (15)

and the tax shield for the period of n years

$T{S}_{n}=tD\left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)}^{-n}\right)$ . (16)

Substituting Equations (14)-(16) into Equation (13), we obtain the Equation (17), which will be used by us in the future to modify the BFO theory for the rating needs.

$\frac{CF\ast \left(1-{\left(1+WACC\right)}^{-n}\right)}{WACC}=\frac{CF}{{K}_{0}}\ast \left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{0}\right)}^{-n}\right)+t\ast D\ast \left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)}^{-n}\right)$ (17)

Below we fulfill the introduction of financial “ratios” into the modern theory of capital structure (Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova (BFO) theory).

As in case of Modigliani-Miller theory above let us consider two kind of rating ratios: coverage ratios and leverage ratios.

5.1. Coverage Ratios

We start from the coverage ratios and will consider three kind of coverage ratios: coverage ratios of debt, coverage ratios of interest on the credit and coverage ratios of debt and interest on the credit. Note, that last type of ratios has been introduced by us for the first time for a more complete valuation of the issuer’s ability to repay debts and to pay interest thereon.

5.1.1. Coverage Ratios of Debt

Let us consider the coverage ratios of debt first.

Dividing the both parts of the Formula (17) by the value of the debt D, we enter the debt coverage ratio into the general BFO theory

${i}_{1}=CF/D$ (18)

$\frac{{i}_{1}\ast \left(1-{\left(1+WACC\right)}^{-n}\right)}{WACC}=\frac{{i}_{1}\ast \left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{0}\right)}^{-n}\right)}{{k}_{0}}+t\ast \left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)}^{-n}\right)$ (19)

${i}_{1}\ast A={i}_{1}\ast B+t\ast C$ (20)

$A=\frac{1-{\left(1+WACC\right)}^{-n}}{WACC}$ ; (21)

$B=\frac{1-{\left(1+{k}_{0}\right)}^{-n}}{{k}_{0}}$ ; (22)

$C=\left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)}^{-n}\right)$ ; (23)

This ratio (i_{1}) can be used to assess of the following parameters used in rating, DCF/Debt, FFO/Debt, CFO/Debt, FOCF/Debt and some others. We will use Formula (19) to study the dependence WACC(i_{1}) and to build a curve of this dependence.

As example, we will analyze the dependence of the weighted average cost of capital, WACC, on debt coverage ratio i_{1}. We consider the case k_{0} = 8%; k_{d} = 4%; t = 20%; i_{1} is changed from 1 up to 10, for two company ages n = 3 and n = 5.

The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on debt i_{1} is shown at Figure 9 and Figure 10.

5.1.2. The Coverage Ratio on Interest on the Credit

Let us analyze now the dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on interest on the credit i_{2}.

Dividing the both parts of the Formula (17) by the value of the interest on the credit k_{d} D, enter the coverage ratio on interest on the crediti_{2}into the general BFO theory

$\frac{{i}_{2}\ast \left(1-{\left(1+WACC\right)}^{-n}\right)}{WACC}=\frac{{i}_{2}\ast \left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{0}\right)}^{-n}\right)}{{k}_{0}}+\frac{t\ast \left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)}^{-n}\right)}{{k}_{d}}$ (24)

Here

$\frac{CF}{D\ast {k}_{d}}={i}_{2}$ (25)

${i}_{2}\ast A={i}_{2}\ast B+\frac{t\ast C}{{k}_{d}}$ (26)

Figure 9. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on debt i_{1} at n = 3.

Figure 10. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on debt i_{1} at n = 5.

The dependences of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on interest on the crediti_{2} at company ages n = 3 and n = 5 are shown at Figure 11 and Figure 12.

This ratio (i_{2}) can be used to assess of the following parameters, used in rating, FFO/cash interest, EBITDA/interest and some others. We will use last formula to build a curve of dependence WACC(i_{2}).

5.1.3. Coverage Ratios of Debt and Interest on the Credit

Let us now study the dependence of the company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratios of debt and interest on the credit simultaneously i_{3}: this is new ratio, introduced by us for the first time here for a more complete description of the issuer’s ability to repay debts and to pay interest thereon.

Dividing the both parts of the Formula (17) by the value of the debt and interest on the credit (1 + k_{d})D, enter the coverage ratio on debt and interest on

Figure 11. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on interest on the credit i_{2} at company age n = 3.

Figure 12. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on interest on the credit i_{2} at company age n = 5.

the credit i_{3} into the general BFO theory

$\frac{CF}{D\ast \left(1+{k}_{d}\right)}={i}_{3}$ (27)

${i}_{3}\ast A={i}_{3}\ast B+\frac{t\ast C}{1+{k}_{d}}\ast {i}_{3}$ (28)

$\frac{{i}_{3}\ast \left(1-{\left(1+WACC\right)}^{-n}\right)}{WACC}=\frac{{i}_{3}\ast \left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{0}\right)}^{-n}\right)}{{k}_{0}}+\frac{t\ast \left(1-{\left(1+{k}_{d}\right)}^{-n}\right)}{1+{k}_{d}}$ (29)

The dependences of company weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on debt and interest on the credit i_{3} at company age n = 3 and n = 3 are shown at Figure 13 and Figure 14.

5.1.4. All Three Coverage Ratios Together

Consolidated data of dependence of WACC on i_{1}, i_{2}, i_{3}, at company age n = 3 and n = 5 are shown at Figure 15 and Figure 16.

Below we analyze the Figures 1-16.

Figure 13. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on debt and interest on the crediti_{3} at company age n = 3.

Figure 14. The dependence of company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on the coverage ratio on debt and interest on the crediti_{2} at company age n = 5.

Figure 15. Consolidated data of dependence of WACC on i_{1}, i_{2}, i_{3}, at company age n = 3.

Figure 16. Consolidated data of dependence of WACC on i_{1}, i_{2}, i_{3}, at company age n = 5.

5.1.5. Analysis and Conclusions

It is seen from the Figures 1-16 that WACC(i_{j}) is increasing function on i_{j} with saturation WACC = k_{0} at high values of i_{j}. Note, that this saturation for companies of finite age is a little bit more gradual than in case of perpetuity companies: in latter case the saturation takes place around i_{j} value of order 1 for ratios i_{1} and i_{3} and of order 4 or 5 for ratios i_{2}. In perpetuity case as well as in case of companies of finite age at saturation WACC reaches the value k_{0} (equity value at zero leverage level). This means that for high values of i_{j} one can choose k_{0} as a discount rate with a very good accuracy in perpetuity case and with a little bit less accuracy in general case (companies of arbitrary ages). Thus the role of parameter k_{0} increases drastically. The method of determination of parameter k_{0} has been developed by Anastasiya Brusova [14] . So, parameter k_{0} is the discount rate for case of high values of i_{j}. In case of ratio i_{2} in general case as well as in perpetuity case the saturation of WACC(i_{2}) takes place at higher values of i_{2}.

In opposite to perpetuity case within BFO theory one could make calculations for companies of arbitrary age because a factor of time presents in this theory. Our calculations show that curve WACC(i_{j}) for company of higher age lies above this curve for younger company. And with increase of i_{j} value the WACC values for different company ages n become closer each other.

Note that curves WACC(i_{1}) and WACC(i_{3}) are very close each other at small enough credit rates, but difference between them will become bigger at higher values of credit rates.

Curve WACC(i_{2}) turns out to be enough different from WACC(i_{1}) and curves WACC(i_{3}).

5.2. Leverage Ratios

5.2.1. Leverage Ratios for Debt

Dividing the both parts of the Formula (17) by the income value for one period CF, we enter the leverage ratiosl_{1}for debt into the general BFO theory

$\frac{1-{\left(1+WACC\right)}^{-n}}{WACC}-\frac{1-{\left(1+{K}_{0}\right)}^{-n}}{{K}_{0}}-t\ast \left[1-{\left(1+{K}_{d}\right)}^{-n}\right]\ast {l}_{1}=0,$ (30)

Here ${l}_{1}=\frac{D}{CF}$ .

Remind, that here WACC is the weighted average cost of capital of the company, l_{1}―the leverage ratios l_{1} for debt, t is the tax on profit rate for organizations (t = 20%), k_{0}―equity cost of financially-independent company, k_{d} is the debt capital cost; n is the company age, CF―income value for one period; D― debt capital value.

The ratio (l_{2}) can be used to assess of the following parameters used in rating, Interests/EBITDA and some others.

By use the above equation we get the following results, representing in Figure 17 for company age n = 3 and in Figure 18 for company age n = 5.

5.2.2. Leverage Ratios for Interest on Credit

The dependence of company weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on leverage ratios on interests on credit l_{2} is described within BFO theory by the following formula:

$\frac{1-{\left(1+WACC\right)}^{-n}}{WACC}-\frac{1-{\left(1+{K}_{0}\right)}^{-n}}{{K}_{0}}-\frac{t\ast {l}_{2}\ast \left[1-{\left(1+{K}_{d}\right)}^{-n}\right]}{{K}_{d}}=0,$ (31)

Figure 17. The dependence of company weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on debt leverage ratio at n = 3.

Here ${l}_{2}=\frac{{K}_{d}\ast D}{CF}$ .

Using it, we find the dependence WACC(l_{2}) at company ages n = 3 and n = 5.

This ratio l_{2} can be used to assess of the following parameters used in rating, Interests/EBITDA and some others (Figure 19, Figure 20).

5.2.3. Leverage Ratios on Debt and Interests on Credit

The dependence of company weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on leverage ratios on debt and interests on credit l_{3} is described within BFO theory by the following formula:

Figure 18. The dependence of company weighted average cost of capital WACC on debt leverage ratios at n = 5.

Figure 19. The dependence of company weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on leverage ratio of interests on credit at company age n = 3.

Figure 20. The dependence of company weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on leverage ratio of interests on credit at company age n = 5.

$\frac{1-{\left(1+WACC\right)}^{-n}}{WACC}-\frac{1-{\left(1+{K}_{0}\right)}^{-n}}{{K}_{0}}-\frac{t\ast {l}_{3}\ast \left[1-{\left(1+{K}_{d}\right)}^{-n}\right]}{{K}_{d}+1}=0,$ (32)

Here ${l}_{3}=\frac{\left({K}_{d}+1\right)\ast D}{CF}$ .

The ratio l_{3} can be used to assess of the following parameters used in rating, Debt + interest/FFO, Debt + interest/EBIT, Debt + interest/EBITDA (R), and some others.

Using it, we find the dependence WACC(l_{3}) at company ages n = 3 and n = 5 (Figure 21, Figure 22).

Below we represent the consolidated data of dependence of WACC on l_{1}, l_{2}, l_{3}, at company age n = 3 and n = 5 (Figure 23, Figure 24).

5.2.4. Analysis and Conclusions

It is seen from the Figures 17-24 that WACC(l_{j}) is decreasing function on l_{j}. WACC decreases from value of k_{0} (equity value at zero leverage level) practically linearly for WACC(l_{1}) and WACC(l_{3}) and with higher speed for WACC(l_{2}). In opposite to perpetuity case within BFO theory one could make calculations for companies of arbitrary age because a factor of time presents in this theory. Our calculations show that curve WACC(l_{i}) for company of higher age lies above this curve for younger company.

Figure 21. The dependence of company weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on leverage ratio on debt and interests on credit at company age n = 3.

Figure 22. The dependence of company weighted average cost of capital (WACC) on leverage ratio of debt and interests on credit at company age n = 5.

Figure 23. Consolidated data of dependence of WACC on l_{1}, l_{2}, l_{3}, at company age n = 3.

Figure 24. Consolidated data of dependence of WACC on l_{1}, l_{2}, l_{3}, at company age n = 5.

Note that curves WACC(l_{1}) and WACC(l_{3}) are very close each other at small enough credit rates, but difference between them will become bigger at higher values of credit rates.

Curve WACC(l_{2}) turns out to be enough different from WACC(l_{1}) and curves WACC(l_{3}).

6. Conclusions

The paper is devoted to application of Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova theory (BFO theory) [1] - [16] and Modigliani-Miller theory (MM theory) [17] [18] [19] in rating. A serious modification of both theories in order to use them in rating procedure has been required. The use of BFO theory allows applying obtained results for real economics, where all companies have finite lifetime, introduce a factor of time into theory, estimate the creditworthiness of companies of arbitrary age (or arbitrary lifetime), introduce discounting of the financial flows, using the correct discount rate etc. Use of the tools of well developed theories in rating opens completely new horizons in the rating industry, which could go from the mainly use of qualitative methods of the evaluation of the creditworthiness of issuers to a predominantly quantitative evaluation methods that will certainly enhance the quality and correctness of the rating.

Currently, rating agencies use financial ratios just directly, while the new methodology will allow (knowing the values of these “ratios” (and parameter k_{0})) determine the correct values of discount rates (WACC and k_{e}) that should be used when discounting the various financial flows, both in terms of their timing and forecasting.

All these create a new base for rating methodologies.

Acknowledgements

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project No. 17-06-00251A.

Cite this paper

Brusov, P. , Filatova, T. , Orekhova, N. and Kulik, V. (2018) Application of Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova Theory (BFO Theory) and Modigliani-Miller Theory (MM Theory) in Rating.*Theoretical Economics Letters*, **8**, 866-887. doi: 10.4236/tel.2018.85062.

Brusov, P. , Filatova, T. , Orekhova, N. and Kulik, V. (2018) Application of Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova Theory (BFO Theory) and Modigliani-Miller Theory (MM Theory) in Rating.

References

[1] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orehova, N. and Eskindarov, M. (2015) Modern Corporate Finance, Investment and Taxation. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, 1-368.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14732-1

[2] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orehova, N. and Brusova, A. (2011) Weighted Average Cost of Capital in the Theory of Modigliani-Miller, Modified for a Finite Life-Time Company. Applied Financial Economics, 21, 815-824.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2010.537635

[3] Brusov, P., Filatova, P. and Orekhova, N. (2013) Absence of an Optimal Capital Structure in the Famous Tradeoff Theory! Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 2, 94-116.

[4] Brusov, P., Filatova, P. and Orekhova, N. (2014) Mechanism of Formation of the Company Optimal Capital Structure, Different from Suggested by Trade off Theory. Cogent Economics & Finance, 2, 1-13.

https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2014.946150

[5] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orehova, N., et al. (2011) From Modigliani-Miller to General Theory of Capital Cost and Capital Structure of the Company. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 2, 16-21.

[6] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Eskindarov, M. and Orehova, N. (2012) Influence of Debt Financing on the Effectiveness of the Finite Duration Investment Project. Applied Financial Economics, 22, 1043-1052.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2011.637893

[7] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orehova, N., et al (2011) Influence of Debt Financing on the Effectiveness of the Investment Project within the Modigliani-Miller Theory. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 2, 11-15.

[8] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Eskindarov, M. and Orehova, N. (2012) Hidden Global Causes of the Global Financial Crisis. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 1, 106-111.

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2012.01.9

[9] Brusov, P., Filatova, T. and Orekhova, N. (2013) Absence of an Optimal Capital Structure in the Famous Tradeoff Theory! Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 2, 94-116.

[10] Brusov, P.N. and Filatova, Т.V. (2011) From Modigliani-Miller to General Theory of Capital Cost and Capital Structure of the Company. Finance and Credit, 435, 2-8.

[11] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orekhova, N., Brusov, P. and Brusova, A. (2012) Modern Approach to Dividend Policy of Company. Finance and Credit, 18.

[12] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orehova, N., Brusov, P.P. and Brusova, N. (2011) From Modigliani-Miller to General Theory of Capital Cost and Capital Structure of the Company. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 2, 16-21.

[13] Brusov, P., Filatova, T. and Orehova, N. (2014) Inflation in Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova Theory and in Its Perpetuity Limit-Modigliani-Miller Theory. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 3, 175-185.

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2014.03.13

[14] Brusova, A. (2011) А Comparison of the Three Methods of Estimation of Weighted Average Cost of Capital and Equity Cost of Company. Financial Analysis: Problems and Solutions, 34, 36-42.

[15] Brusov, P., Filatova, T. and Orehova, N. (2013) A Qualitatively New Effect in Corporative Finance: Abnormal Dependence of Cost of Equity of Company on Leverage. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 2, 183-193.

[16] Filatova, Т., Orehova, N. and Brusova, А. (2008) Weighted Average Cost of Capital in the Theory of Modigliani-Miller, Modified for a Finite Life-Time Company. Bulletin of the FU, 48, 68-77.

[17] Мodigliani, F. and Мiller, M. (1958) The Cost of Capital, Corporate Finance, and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261-297.

[18] Мodigliani, F. and Мiller, M. (1963) Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. American Economic Review, 53, 147-175.

[19] Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1966) Some Estimates of the Cost of Capital to the Electric Utility Industry 1954-1957. American Economic Review, 56, 333-391.

[1] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orehova, N. and Eskindarov, M. (2015) Modern Corporate Finance, Investment and Taxation. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, 1-368.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14732-1

[2] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orehova, N. and Brusova, A. (2011) Weighted Average Cost of Capital in the Theory of Modigliani-Miller, Modified for a Finite Life-Time Company. Applied Financial Economics, 21, 815-824.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2010.537635

[3] Brusov, P., Filatova, P. and Orekhova, N. (2013) Absence of an Optimal Capital Structure in the Famous Tradeoff Theory! Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 2, 94-116.

[4] Brusov, P., Filatova, P. and Orekhova, N. (2014) Mechanism of Formation of the Company Optimal Capital Structure, Different from Suggested by Trade off Theory. Cogent Economics & Finance, 2, 1-13.

https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2014.946150

[5] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orehova, N., et al. (2011) From Modigliani-Miller to General Theory of Capital Cost and Capital Structure of the Company. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 2, 16-21.

[6] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Eskindarov, M. and Orehova, N. (2012) Influence of Debt Financing on the Effectiveness of the Finite Duration Investment Project. Applied Financial Economics, 22, 1043-1052.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2011.637893

[7] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orehova, N., et al (2011) Influence of Debt Financing on the Effectiveness of the Investment Project within the Modigliani-Miller Theory. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 2, 11-15.

[8] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Eskindarov, M. and Orehova, N. (2012) Hidden Global Causes of the Global Financial Crisis. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 1, 106-111.

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2012.01.9

[9] Brusov, P., Filatova, T. and Orekhova, N. (2013) Absence of an Optimal Capital Structure in the Famous Tradeoff Theory! Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 2, 94-116.

[10] Brusov, P.N. and Filatova, Т.V. (2011) From Modigliani-Miller to General Theory of Capital Cost and Capital Structure of the Company. Finance and Credit, 435, 2-8.

[11] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orekhova, N., Brusov, P. and Brusova, A. (2012) Modern Approach to Dividend Policy of Company. Finance and Credit, 18.

[12] Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orehova, N., Brusov, P.P. and Brusova, N. (2011) From Modigliani-Miller to General Theory of Capital Cost and Capital Structure of the Company. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 2, 16-21.

[13] Brusov, P., Filatova, T. and Orehova, N. (2014) Inflation in Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova Theory and in Its Perpetuity Limit-Modigliani-Miller Theory. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 3, 175-185.

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2014.03.13

[14] Brusova, A. (2011) А Comparison of the Three Methods of Estimation of Weighted Average Cost of Capital and Equity Cost of Company. Financial Analysis: Problems and Solutions, 34, 36-42.

[15] Brusov, P., Filatova, T. and Orehova, N. (2013) A Qualitatively New Effect in Corporative Finance: Abnormal Dependence of Cost of Equity of Company on Leverage. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 2, 183-193.

[16] Filatova, Т., Orehova, N. and Brusova, А. (2008) Weighted Average Cost of Capital in the Theory of Modigliani-Miller, Modified for a Finite Life-Time Company. Bulletin of the FU, 48, 68-77.

[17] Мodigliani, F. and Мiller, M. (1958) The Cost of Capital, Corporate Finance, and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261-297.

[18] Мodigliani, F. and Мiller, M. (1963) Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. American Economic Review, 53, 147-175.

[19] Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1966) Some Estimates of the Cost of Capital to the Electric Utility Industry 1954-1957. American Economic Review, 56, 333-391.