Back
 ENG  Vol.10 No.3 , March 2018
Numerical Feasibility Study of a Wax Cold Flow Approach for Subsea Tie-In Flowlines Using a 1D Mechanistic Multiphase Flow Simulator
Abstract: This work is a thermo-fluid numerical case study to investigate the size and performance of a system that eliminates needs for insulating, heating and inhibiting chemically the deposition of wax in subsea tie-in flowlines. For short, we call this type of systems “Cold Flow”. The particular system analyzed in this study consists of a reactor unit at the inlet to the flowline, where the thermal solubility of the wax-creating molecules is reduced by cooling. Subsequently, solid wax is deposited in the reactor piping and wax free crude is entering the flowline. The reactor is regenerated periodically. The reactor-pipeline system was modelled using a commercial flowline simulator, with transient, thermal, multiphase and deposition capabilities. The basic layout used was a transportation pipeline of 8 km and 6.69 in ID with a mass flow rate of 17.51 kg/s, a water cut (WC) of zero and an inlet temperature of 70°C. The wax appearance temperature (cloud point) of the crude is 22°C and the seabed temperature is 4°C. Three types of reactors have been simulated: a non-insulated pipe section, a passive cooler with a bundle of parallel pipes and an active cooler. Sensitivity analyses have been performed for all three cases varying the external convective coefficient, the reactor pipeline diameter and the WC. For a non-insulated pipeline section cooler, the required length is of the same order of magnitude as the main flowline, implying that such a solution is impractical for short flowline distances or when a compact deployment is desired. For the passive cooler case, the required length was half of that in the previous case; thus it is still significant. For the active cooler reactor, the required cooling duty was 2.2 MW. In all three cases, the pipe-flow dynamics were analyzed, and the pigging arrangement complexity has been qualitatively addressed. However, the detailed design falls out of the scope of this study.
Cite this paper: González, D. , Stanko, M. and Golan, M. (2018) Numerical Feasibility Study of a Wax Cold Flow Approach for Subsea Tie-In Flowlines Using a 1D Mechanistic Multiphase Flow Simulator. Engineering, 10, 109-123. doi: 10.4236/eng.2018.103008.
References

[1]   Coberly, C. (1942) Method of Preventing Wax Deposits in Tubing. US Patent No. 2303823 A.

[2]   Merino-Garcia, D. and Correra, S. (2008) Cold Flow: A Review of a Technology to Avoid Wax Deposition. Taylor & Francis Group, Ed, 26, 446-459.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10916460600809741

[3]   Al-Yaari, M. (2011) Paraffin Wax Deposition: Mitigation & Removal Techniques. SPE Saudi Arabia Section Young Professionals Technical Symposium, Dhahran, 14-16 March 2011, SPE-155412-MS.

[4]   Berson, R.A. (2000) Method for Making Slurry. US Patent No. 6070417 A.

[5]   Fung, G., Amin, R., Fleyfel, F. and O’Sullivan, J. (2003) Method for Reducing Solids Buildup in Hydrocarbon Steams Produced from Wells. US Patent No. 6656366 B1.

[6]   Nenniger, J. (1991) Process for Inhibiting Formation of Wax Deposits. CA Patent No. 1289497 C.

[7]   Knowles, W.T. (1987) Choke Cooling Waxy Oil. US Patent No. 4697426 A.

[8]   Watson, M.J., Speranza, A. and LaCombe, M. (2015) Rigorous Integrated Production Modelling of Cold Flow Technology. Offshore Technology Conference Brazil. Rio de Janeiro, 27-29 Ctober 2015, OTC-26291-MS.

[9]   Larsen, R., Lund, A. and Argo, C.B. (2003) Cold Flow—A Practical Solution. 11th International Conference on Multhiphase Flow “Multiphase 03” BHR Group, San Remo, 11-13 June 2003.

[10]   Gudmundsson, J.S. (2002) Cold Flow Hydrate Technology. 4th International Conference on Gas Hydrates, Yokohama, 19-23 May 2002, 5 p.

[11]   Azarinezhad, R., Chapoy, R., Anderson, R. and Tohidi, B. (2008) HYDRAFLOW: A Multiphase Cold Flow Technology for Offshore Flow Assurance Challenges. 2008 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 5-8 May 2008, OTC-19485-MS.
https://doi.org/10.4043/19485-MS

[12]   Akpabio, M.G. (2013) Cold Flow in Long Distance Subsea Pipelines. Master Thesis, NTNU, Trondheim.

[13]   Vinatovskaja, E. (2015) Cold Flow in the Arctic: A Feasibility Study. Master Thesis, University of Stavanger, Stavanger.

[14]   Kondapi, P. and Moe, R. (2013) Today’s Top 30 Flow Assurance Technologies: Where Do They Stand? Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 6-9 May 2013, OTC-24250-MS.

[15]   Olga (2012) User Manual.

[16]   Rosvol, K. (2008) Wax Deposition Model. Master Thesis, NTNU, Trondheim.

[17]   Burger, E.D., Perkins, T.K. and Striegler, J.H. (1981) Studies of Wax Deposition in the Trans Alaska Pipeline. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 33, 1075-1086.
https://doi.org/10.2118/8788-PA

[18]   Bern, P.A., Withers, V.R. and Cairns, J.R. (1980) Wax Deposition in Crude Oil Pipelines. European Offshore Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, London, UK, 21-24 October 1980, SPE-206-1980-MS.
https://doi.org/10.2118/206-1980-MS

[19]   Brown, T.S., Niessen, V.G. and Erickson, D. (1993) Measurement and Prediction of the Kinetics of Paraffin Deposition. 68th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, 3-6 October 1993, SPE-26548-MS.
https://doi.org/10.2118/26548-MS

[20]   Empig (2017).
http://empig.no/technology/

[21]   Bergman, T., Lavine, A., Incropera, F. and Dewitt, D. (2011) Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. 7th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Jefferson City.

[22]   NOV (2017).
http://www.nov.com/Segments/Completion_and_Production_Solutions/ Subsea_Production_Systems/Subsea_Cooling.aspx

 
 
Top