The Chinese citrus fly, Bactrocera minax (Enderlein), is the most destructive citrus pest in many groves in south-central China. The pest can cause up to 100% fruit damage in severe situations  -  . B. minax also occurs in limited regions of Bhutan and Northwest India bordering with China  .
Interest in this pest outside of China has risen in recent years. This is primarily due to the concern that B. minax might spread to the world’s other major citrus production regions through fresh fruit trade and travelers. China has already exported a large volume of fresh citrus fruits to a number of countries in Asia, Russia, Europe, and the Americas  . Mexico just recently approved China fresh citrus fruits market access  . It appears that fresh citrus fruits from China will likely reach US markets in the near future     . To prevent this severe pest from spreading to other countries, sound knowledge of the pest is critical for pest safeguarding works.
Laboratory and field studies of the pest have been carried out in China since the early part of the last century. However, results of these works were almost exclusively published in Chinese journals, with few exceptions  -  . Several Chinese review papers on the pest were published recently     . Besides the language issue, these review papers are generally brief, falling short of a comprehensive review about the pest, especially in the safeguarding areas such as pest detection, monitoring, and phytosanitary measures. The goal of this review is to fill this gap. Specifically, this paper has two major objectives: 1) to provide readers with a comprehensive review of current understandings of this pest, focusing on the areas of pest safeguarding; and 2) to highlight some of the critical scientific and technological gaps in protecting the US citrus industry from the potential invasion of this destructive pest. Since several papers in English have good coverage on the basic biology and ecology of B. minax  -    , this paper will be brief on these areas.
2. Life Cycle and Biology
B. minax has several biological characteristics that separate this species from the vast majority of species in the genus Bactrocera. First, B. minax is univoltine; second, the species is oligophagous, exclusively feeding on citrus plants; third, the pest is large in size, larvae can be as long as 16 mm, adults can reach as long as 24 mm  ; and lastly, B. minax is among the most cold tolerant species in the genus, with larvae able to survive freezing temperatures for days   .
The life cycle of B. minax is well studied in China. Adults start to emerge in April across most occurrence regions (Table 1). Adults live from one to three months, with life cycles ending in late June to July in most regions      . After emerging, adults fly to nearby woods feeding on such items as honeydew secreted by aphids  . By the second to third week, adults reach sexual maturity and start mating  . Females lay eggs 15 days or so after mating   . The insect prefers laying eggs in young fruits with diameters of 2 to 4 cm      . The number of eggs laid per female varies from 50 to more than 200 eggs    . It appears that adults prefer laying eggs on sweet orange to other citrus fruits   . The egg stage lasts roughly one month. Larvae feed inside the fruits until maturity (3rd instar). The mature
Table 1. The life cycle of B. minax in major citrus production province of China.
larvae fall from hanging fruits or exit from fallen fruits into soil for overwintering. The larval stage lasts roughly two months. The pupal stage is the longest stage of the species, lasting from 150 to almost 200 days    . Most pupae overwinter in the soil at a depth of 4 - 6 cm    . Scientists in China generally agree that pupae go through a weak diapause    that requires some cold temperature threshold exposure to break the diapause   . Topical application of hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone can terminate the diapause process  .
3. Distribution of B. minax
B. minax occurs in nine citrus production provinces in China (Figure 1). However, the severity and economic impact of the pest can vary extremely among these provinces. Accordingly, the occurrence area of B. minax in China can be grouped into three regions (Common, Moderate, and Low). It is worth mentioning that since there is no domestic pest survey program like the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (https://caps.ceris.purdue.edu/home) in China, the pest distribution discussed here is largely based on published papers.
3.1. Common Occurrence Region
Areas in China where B. minax is widely occurring and causes significant economic damage to citrus include the following provinces and/or municipalities:
Guizhou. B. minax has been reported in all citrus production areas in the province      . Chinese scientists believe that Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau is likely the original home to this species, based on its occurrence history and pattern of spread  .
Sichuan. Sichuan is one of China’s major citrus growing provinces. Similar to Guizhou, B. minax has a long occurrence history in Sichuan province       . The earliest report of the pest was from the 1850s   and by the 1950s, B. minax was found in all major citrus production regions. Sichuan borders northward with the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau.
Chongqing. Administratively, this central government direct-controlled municipality city was a part of Sichuan province until 1997. As discussed above, B. minax has widely occurred in Sichuan since the 1950s and accordingly, the pest is common in the municipality of Chongqing as well. The pest is particularly prevalent in the citrus production area near the Three Gorges Dam     .
Hubei. Hubei is another major citrus growing province in China. B. minax occurs commonly throughout the province       .
Hunan. Hunan is China’s number one citrus growing province based on annual fruit production  . B. minax was found in all production regions, with various levels of severity     . Generally speaking, the occurrence is more severe in moderately elevated (200 to 600 m ASL) locations.
Figure 1. B. minax distribution in China.
3.2. Moderate Occurrence Region
Areas of China where B. minax is present but occurs in limited areas with moderate to low population levels and where economic damage to the citrus industry is correspondingly moderate to low, include the following provinces:
Yunnan. Although Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau is believed to be the original home of this species, B. minax is mainly found in the northeast regions bordering with Guizhou province   . A recent 2-year-study in Dali, a western region of the province, found no B. minax present (Ouyang, unpublished data), which supports the claim that the pest might have a limited distribution there.
Guangxi. Although B. minax has been reported from Guangxi province since the 1950s, the economic damage and distribution area appear moderate   . The area where occurrence is more common is in the northern citrus production area, bordering with Hunan and Guizhou.
Shaanxi. Shaanxi is the northern most citrus producing province in China. The province is at similar latitudes as Oklahoma in US B. minax can be commonly found in areas around Hanzhong, the province’s major citrus production region        . As citrus acreage expands rapidly in the province, B. minax occurrence might become more severe.
Jiangxi. Jiangxi is China’s major sweet orange production province. However, citrus production has been severely impacted by the outbreak of huanglongbing (citrus greening) in recent years. B. minax occurs in the northern region of Jiujiang   .
3.3. Low Occurrence Region
Henan and Jiangsu Provinces have reported occurrences of B. minax, however, the pest was either eradicated or disappeared itself     . These two provinces have very limited citrus production.
According to existing data, B. minax is not reported in four southern coastal citrus production provinces: Guangdong, Fujian, Zhejiang, and Hainan Island. No study has been conducted to explore why B. minax does not occur in these provinces  . Temperature might be the primary factor. B. minax appears to be a temperate tephritid species, whose biology is more closely related to Rhagoletis species than other Bactrocera. The known geographical distribution of B. minax in China is in the areas between 24 - 33 N latitude, usually 230 - 1500 m in altitude   . The warm winters and hot humid summers in Fujian, Guangdong, and Hainan may limit B. minax presence. It is not sure whether interspecific competition plays any role here or not   . Due to different food niche and host preference, it is very unlikely that any competition exists between B. minax and B. tau as well as B. curcubitae, two common tephritid fruit flies occur in southern China. The interspecific relationships between B. minax and B. dorsalis, the most destructive and predominant fruit fly in southern China, is more complex than with other tephritid species. Although both species feed on citrus fruits, B. dorsalis is a polyphagous species, prefers laying eggs on the maturing fruits, whereas B. minax feeds Citrus fruits only, prefers laying eggs on young fruits as stated earlier.
4. A Brief on the Region of Origin and Spread of B. minax
It is our opinion that Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau is likely the region of origin for B. minax for the following three reasons. First, B. minax appeared widely distributed in the mountainous Guizhou province long before other places in China   . Chinese literature more than 1000 years ago described citrus fruit maggots and fruit fly field occurrence in Guizhou and Hubei    . Since few damaging fruit flies are ever reported in the region other than B. minax, it seems reasonable to assume that the fruit fly described in the literature was B. minax. Second, B. minax is exclusively a citrus plant pest. Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau is believed to be one of the original places of contemporary citrus species   . Third, according to studies, before the 20th century the pest was primarily spread by the waterway systems (i.e. rivers)  . Several high mountain peaks of Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau are the source of many great rivers in Asia, including China’s two largest rivers, Yangtze and Yellow River, as well as the Mekong (also known as the Lancang) and Salween Rivers, which run into other countries in Southeast Asia (Figure 2). This might explain why neighboring provinces such as Hubei, Hunan, and Sichuan also have a long history of the pest occurrence, as well as its occurrence in the Kingdom of Bhutan and northwest India.
Further discussion of the possible region of origin of B. minax is beyond the purpose of this writing. However, knowledge of the pest’s origin can be critical in the development of a pest risk assessment and other safeguarding efforts. For example, Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau is a typical moderate climate region in spite of its low latitude location. Average high temperatures during July in Yunnan are about 25˚C, vs. 34˚C in Orlando, Florida (Figure 3), US whereas the climate of China’s southern coastal region is similar to Florida. As discussed above, China’s coastal citrus region has no B. minax reported so far. There are few restrictions on the movement of fresh fruits, either by vehicles or travelers in China. Therefore, we may speculate that B. minax might have reached its natural limit of geographical distribution within China and similarly speculate that the climate in Florida might not be a good match for this pest.
5. Field Infestation and Severity
Although B. minax has a long history of occurrence in China, the pest didn’t have widespread economic impact until recent decades. Three factors contributed to the change in pest status. First, citrus growing acreage in China has experienced dramatic expansion in recent decades. For the period of 1949 to 2008, China’s citrus production area and fresh fruit yield rose 62.2 and 103.8 fold, respectively, vs. world averages of 7.3 and 6.7 fold for the same period  . The
Figure 2. Yunnan-Guizhou plateau, china.
Figure 3. Average high/low temperature in Yunnan (right), China, in comparison to Orlando, Florida (left), US (credit: http://www.worldweatheronline.com/orlando-weather-averages/florida/us.aspx).
majority of the production expansion occurred in the south-central region such as in Hubei and Hunan, where B. minax commonly occurs. Second, changes in China’s agricultural production system occurred in the late 1970s to the early 1980s that disrupted area-wide pest management programs. The previously large collective-owned orchards were replaced with small-scale (usually less than 0.3 ha), family-owned orchards. This change made it much more challenging to coordinate and enforce pest management activities. Third, weak domestic pest quarantine and inspection efforts failed to stop the spread of this pest. There was essentially no domestic quarantine and inspection in China before 1950 and even today the system is unreliable. B. minax, has not been on China’s quarantine pest list since 2009  .
Theoretically, both trapping and fruit infestation data are good indicators of pest severity. However, due to the fact that there is no effective trap for the pest, as we will discuss later, negative trapping data for this pest can be misleading. Fruit infestation might be the only reliable indicator of pest severity in the case of B. minax. Table 2 summarizes the data from six provinces.
Guizhou. Fruit infestation by B. minax in the province varied widely, from less than 1 to 100%. The Plant Protection Station of Guizhou Province conducted a province-wide survey from 1994 to 1996. Among 6080 ha surveyed, B. minax occurred in 4180 ha, accounting for 68.8% of the surveyed area. A total of 55 counties in the province had B. minax occurrence. Zunyi region had an average of 20% - 40% fruits infested   .
Hubei. B. minax occurrence in Hubei is more severe than Guizhou, based on the data of infested fruits. Most surveys indicated 20% or higher of fruits infested.
Hunan. Hunan is another severe B. minax occurring province. A recent survey by  showed more than 50%, and up to 100% fruit infestation in some groves. Our recent field trips to the province indicated that in the well-managed groves such as most citrus orchards in Shimen County, fruit infestation usually falls under 1%.
Sichuan. As discussed above, Sichuan has a long history of B. minax occurrence. The most notorious outbreak of B. minax in recent China’s history occurred in Guangyuan region of the province. The severity of the outbreak was unprecedented; few fruits in the entire region were saved from B. minax infestation   . Unfortunately, few data are publically available, but limited survey data indicated 20% - 30% of fruits were infested with B. minax (Table 2).
Henan and Shaanxi. These two provinces have very limited citrus production areas. B. minax was reported to cause various degrees of fruit damages.
6. Host & Host Preference
Table 3 lists the citrus host plants reported in Chinese literature. It appears that all Citrus cultivated species and cultivars in China are hosts of B. minax. Other documented hosts of B. minax in family Rutaceae include trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata), a common rootstock used in citrus grafting, and kumquat, Fortunella margarita.
Strong scientific evidence suggests that B. minax prefers navel oranges and/or other sweet orange cultivars     . Table 4 lists field survey data, comparing B. minax fruit infestation rates on citrus species/varieties. Navel orange and other sweet oranges consistently showed the highest fruit infestation rates. However, one field survey indicated that B. minax preferred pomelo,
Table 2. Field fruit infestations by B. minax.
Table 3. Reported hosts of B. minax in China.
Table 4. B. minax fruit infestations by citrus species/cultivars.
* reference cited.
Citrus maxima, to a Chinese sweet orange cultivar Jincheng orange judging by fruit infestation rates  .
No study has ever been undertaken to investigate the roles of chemical and visual cues on host selection, although the color and shape of trapping devices have been studied for attracting the pest in China and Bhutan  . We speculate that plant phenology as well as the thickness of citrus fruit skin may play a key role in the pest’s host selection. B. minax appears to prefer laying eggs on fruits of 2 - 4 cm diameter      . Fruit sizes of naval orange and other early ripening cultivars usually fall within this size range during the period of B. minax oviposition. Because of the energy cost of penetrating through the thick fruit skin, B. minax may choose to oviposit in the thin skinned fruits. This mechanism of host selection has been proved in other tephritid fruit flies  . Although pomelo, which have thick skins and are typically 15 - 25 cm in size, are also a preferred host of B. minax, they are attacked as young green fruits  .
7. Pest Management and Domestic Quarantine Measures
Area-wide pest management or integrated pest management is not commonly adopted in China, with the exception of few large cooperative orchards in the major export citrus production counties such as Shimen in Hunan and Pinghe in Fujian. Instead, growers use one or more of the options discussed below for management of B. minax. There is no report of using biological control against the pest. Two studies indicated that natural enemies such as spiders and wasps had few impacts on the population of B. minax   .
Fruit bagging is not a common practice in citrus groves. Exceptions can be found in those high value groves such as pomelo and lime. Few studies have ever been conducted using this approach for managing B. minax  . Rather, bagging is done for cosmetic reasons, as it gives the fruit a highly prized uniform golden color.
7.2. Grove Sanitation and Fall/Winter Soil Treatment
This practice is common in well-managed citrus groves. The fallen and hanging infested fruits are collected in large bags. These bags with the infested fruits are subjected to various treatments, ranging from heat treatment (by exposing the bags under the sun), boiling, deep bury, to burning      . Studies have indicated that good sanitation practices can significantly reduce B. minax infestation rates from 50% - 100% to less than 1%    .
As stated earlier, the majority of the overwintering B. minax pupae stay in soil at depths of 4 - 6 cm. Raking and/or shallow plowing in fall/winter can expose the pupae to the cold winter temperature, and natural enemies such as birds    . Soil treatment with insecticides before adult emergence can further reduce the number of emerging population    .
7.3. Complete Removal of Food Sources of B. minax
B. minax feeds on citrus fruits only, so theoretically, making citrus fruits unavailable during the egg-laying season can disrupt the entire population in the area. Of course, this option can be valid only under certain special circumstances such as:
1) Replanting or re-grafting citrus plants for the entire grove or area. Growers may replant the entire grove for disease management or changing to a market favorite variety  .
2) Spraying plant growth regulators to end fruiting season before B. minax oviposition. Ethrel spraying is a common way to force citrus fruit falling prematurely  . This approach is valid only in the groves where B. minax occurs severely.
3) Seasonable avoidance by planting late ripening cultivars  . B. minax egg laying season usually falls between June and July. Certain late ripening cultivars which start fruiting in or after July should avoid the infestation.
7.4. Control of Adult Flies by Mass-Trapping and Foliar Insecticide Application
Mass-trapping and foliar insecticide spraying are the predominant approach to managing B. minax in China.
Food based lures are extensively used in citrus groves in China. These lures are primarily for mass-trapping efforts only, often used together with insecticide application. Color sticky spheres are being used in recent years in limited groves only. Preliminary studies have been conducted to discover sex pheromones and citrus plant volatiles for attraction of B. minax.
Food-based lures. Food-based lures are the only type of lures used in the field. The most common food-based lures are hydrolyzed proteins, waste brewer's yeasts, and sugar + vinegar mix     . Many of these lures are home and/or local-made. Field surveys and literature reviews indicated that the efficacy of these products were inconsistent, often conflicting each other. Zhou et al.  compared the efficacy of four lures, i.e. hydrolyzed protein (H-protein bait), a homemade bait from beer yeast, torula yeast, sugar-vinegar-wine (SVW), and Jufengâ (a commercial protein-based fruit fly bait made in China) in 2010. The results suggested that H-protein bait was the most effective lure, followed by SVW. Both torula yeast and Jufengâ showed poor efficacies. Our collaborators conducted a similar study using nine lures, including all four lures mentioned above, in China in 2015 and 2016. H-protein didn’t show better attraction to B. minax than other lures (Ouyang, unpublished data). Gong et al.  conducted another field study using five lures, i.e. 20% hydrolyzed protein (20% H-protein lure), Greatâ #1 fruit fly lure (a common commercial protein based product in China), Jufengâ fruit fly lure, conventional sugar-vinegar-Chinese liquor (Conventional SVL), and improved sugar-vinegar-Chinese liquor (improved SVL, sugar + acetic acid + ethanol). Great #1, 20% H-protein, Jufengâ, and Improvement SVL showed no statistical difference in the attractive efficacy, although 20% H-protein had the highest trapping number of B. minax. The conventional SVL lure had the lowest trapping number, but was only statistically different from the 20% H-protein bait. Results from the study conducted by Zhang  added more inconsistencies regarding the performance of these food-based lures. Efficacy of 5% H-protein alone was not statistically different from 5% sugar alone (Table 5). Sugar solution or sugar vinegar mixture is a commonly used B. minax lure in China, usually mixed with insecticides. However, field experience and scientific studies indicated that the lure performed poorly in the field  .
As mentioned above, Jufengâ fruit fly lure is a commonly used fruit fly lure in China. The efficacy of this product is disputable, based on grower’s experience and the results from the studies cited above. However, one study claimed that 1:2 (Jufengâ lure solution: water) diluted solution of the product had the best B. minax attraction, compared to 2:1 solution, 100% Jufengâ solution, or sugar-vinegar-Chinese liquor mixture  . The product label recommends using 100% Jufengâ solution.
We conducted a two-year study comparing the performance of nine common tephritid fruit fly lures for B. minax attraction. The study was conducted in four groves across China’s major citrus production region. The preliminary results suggested that two most common parapheromone lures―cuelure and methyl eugenol had no effect on B. minax, and that other food-based lures, ranging from H-protein, and yeast, to sugar-vinegar mixture performed poorly in attracting B. minax (Xia, unpublished data).
Table 5. Result of a field lure performance test  .
* Statistical significance at P < 0.05.
One small study tried to link trapping efficacy of lures against B. minax to the actual field population  . Twenty-one traps (7 treatment × 3 rep/trt) which were deployed in 0.07 ha grove attracted roughly 1/20 of the total field population. The seven treatments were 1) 3% sugar + 1% trichlorfon, 2) 3% sugar +1% trichlorfon + Chinese liquor, 3) 10% sugar + 1% trichlorfon, 4) 10% sugar + 1% trichlorfon + Chinese liquor, 5) 10% sugar + 1% trichlorfon + Chinese liquor, 6) 20% sugar + 1% trichlorfon + Chinese liquor, 7) 10% honey + 1% trichlorfon.
Color sticky spheres. Color sticky spheres are being increasingly used for B. minax pest management in recent years      . The earliest study of using the device for managing B. minax was actually conducted in Bhutan by a joint team of Australia and Bhutan scientists  . The study found that 5 cm-diameter-spheres were always more attractive to B. minax than 5 cm-discs of the same color. Spheres of orange or green-yellow were most attractive to the fly compared with spheres of red, yellow, green, blue, black, or white. Later, a study conducted in China indicated that yellow and orange colored foods were more attractive to B. minax adults than foods in blue, green, white, red, and black  . Two patents on using color sticky spheres have been issued in China; one patented a 14 cm-diameter, green-yellow sphere  and another patented a 7 cm-diameter, green color sphere  . Xiao’s patent claims that the green color sphere was more attractive to B. minax than orange and green-yellow colored ones. Our collaborator’s recent study indicated that 7 cm-diameter green spheres attracted the highest number of B. minax among nine lures, including the most popular B. minax lures in China such as hydrolyzed protein, yeast, and sugar vinegar mixture (Xia, unpublished data).
Sex pheromone and citrus plant chemicals. Preliminary work has been carried out in China to discover a female sex pheromone and plant volatiles that might improve lure efficacy. This work is summarized in Table 6. Laboratory studies indicated that B. minax males responded to gland and/or rectum extracts of females, and to a lesser extent of the same sex. Two field studies showed inconsistent outcomes. Xiao et al.  demonstrated the female rectum extract had the highest attraction to both males and females, compared to three other lures (Table 7). However, the field study conducted by Xia & Hong  failed to demonstrate the female rectum extract attracted males, in spite of the positive response in a lab study. The scientists claimed that 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol (BHT) is the sex pheromone. A patent claiming undecanol as the female sex pheromone of B. minax has been granted to another institute  . We are not aware of any field efficacy data available for the patented compound.
Since B. minax is an oligophagous insect, feeding on the fruits of Rutaceae plants only, citrus plant volatiles may play a critical role in B. minax host finding and oviposition behavior. A recently published laboratory study revealed that female adults were attracted to nonanal, citral, limonene and linalool from citrus fruits (Table 6).
7.4.2. Foliar Pesticide Spray
Foliar spraying of insecticide during the early adult stage around late April to May is one of the most common B. minax management options in China. Commonly used insecticides are organophosphates such as trichlorfon and/or pyrethroids such as deltamethrin. These insecticides are usually applied weekly using backpack or small mechanical sprayers. Unfortunately, in spite of the numerous publications on the topic     , few of these publications provided solid scientific data on the efficacy of the sprays. Xu  compared the efficacy of foliar sprays of fipronil, trichlorfon, and water, found 3.2, 11.0, and 21.3% B. minax-caused fallen fruits at harvest, respectively (Table 8). However,
Table 6. Studies on B. minax pheromone & plant volatiles in China.
12,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol (BHT); 2Undecanol.
Table 7. Attractive efficacy of rectum extracts of B. minax vs. other food-based lures  .
*Statistical significance at P < 0.05.
Table 8. Efficacy of foliar insecticide spraying  .
there was no explanation on the differences such as B. minax population among the three test sites, or statistical analysis of the results.
Sterile insect technique (SIT). Using SIT for managing B. minax was once a national priority project in the late 1980s to the early 1990s. Several sterile insect release studies have been carried out in Guizhou province. These studies were primarily conducted by a team of scientists from the Institute of Nuclear Applications, China Academy of Agricultural Sciences & the Institute of Nuclear Applications, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences  . A total of 56,272 and 95,320 sterile male adults, which were treated with cobalt-60 at a dose of 90 Gy at pupal stage, were released into a 31 ha, 10-year Satsuma mandarin (C. unshiu) grove, in 1987 and 1989, respectively. The ratio of released to wild flies was 12.5:1 and 45:1, respectively, in the two releases. The first release (1987) resulted in a reduction of fruit infestation rate from 7.5% in 1986 to 0.20% in 1987; the second release (1989) further reduced the infestation rate from 0.16% in 1988 to 0.005% in 1989. The group conducted even larger releases in Guizhou province in 1993 and 1994. A total of 593,000 and 1,000,200 of sterile male adults were released into seven 120-ha, 10-plus-year-old Satsuma mandarin groves. The irradiation treatment was the same as the studies conducted in 1987 and 1989. The release in 1993 resulted in a reduction of the fruit infestation rate from 5.2% (the average fruit infestation rate in previous three years) to 0.134%, which was further reduced to 0.098% following the second release in 1994. All released flies in the studies were from natural populations, i.e. the infested fruits were collected at the late larval stage. These fruits were then placed in containers with sand to allow the larvae to pupate. The pupae were then collected by hand, and treated with the aforementioned irradiation dose.
Technical obstacles were the major challenge  . B. minax is a univoltine species, it has proved very challenging to mass-rear and field collections are very expensive.
7.5. Domestic Quarantine and Inspection
As discussed above, B. minax is not on the list of domestic quarantine pests in China  . Therefore, there are no inspections or restrictions against the movement of this species in China.
8. Phytosanitary Treatment
So far, study of phytosanitary measures of B. minax has focused primarily on two approaches: irradiation and cold treatment.
The impacts of irradiation on B. minax larvae inside of citrus fruits (a mix of pomelo and sweet orange) have been studied. Zhao et al.  used cobalt-60 to treat 3rd instars. The mortality of treated larvae rose as the treatment dose increased from 10 GY to 1 KGy. The surviving larvae from the treatment pupated 100%, but fewer adults emerged from the higher dose treatment. When the treatment dose reached 50 GY, no adults emerged. LD50 and LD100 of larvae and pupae were 2.76 and 87.78 KGy, and 20.4 and 70 GY, respectively. Gao et al.  conducted similar studies in 1994, 1995, and 1996, suggesting 90 Gy is needed to reach zero adult emergence from treated pupae.
8.2. Cold Treatment
Although we don’t know precisely how B. minax reacts to cold treatment, there is strong evidence that this pest should be amongst the coldest tolerant Bactrocera species. First, as discussed earlier, the distribution of this species is primarily in the temperate area of south central China; second, several small-scale studies indicate that B. minax can survive freezing temperatures for days. Fan et al.  studied the impact of temperature on the survival of 3rd instar larvae. Twenty larvae were placed between two moisture tissues inside a beaker (each beaker was a replicate, with three replicates per treatment). A total of five treatments, i.e. three temperature treatments: 0˚C, 3˚C, 6˚C, and two control treatments: 21˚C and natural room temperature, were included in the study. Under 0˚C treatment, first larval death occurred on day 12, and larval mortality reached 55% on day 22, and 93% on day 23. Whereas under a natural room temperature of 11.5˚C, larval mortality occurred on day 20, and only reached 6% mortality by day 29. There was no mortality under 21˚C control treatment during the observation period. However, another similar study using 2nd instars showed quite a different outcome  . After treatment with 0˚C for 1 h, the treated larvae were moved to an environmental chamber under 25˚C ± 1˚C, where 80% larval death was recorded within 24 h. In another study conducted by Huang et al.  , the supercooling and freezing points of B. minax were evaluated. The 3rd instar larvae have a supercooling point and freezing point of −7.09 and −3.43˚C, respectively. A low supercooling point indicates a high resistance to cold  .
In summary, irradiation treatment appears to be a more promising B. minax phytosanitary treatment, compared to the prospect of cold treatment.
8.3. Heat Treatment
Few studies were conducted using heat treatment as an option of B. minax phytosanitary treatment. Liu et al.  showed that 3rd instars died 100% following 1h of exposure to 47˚C. Unfortunately, the methodology used to perform their experiments is not clearly explained. Since B. minax is tolerant to cold temperature, it is not a surprise that this species might be susceptible to high temperature.
9. Scientific and Technological Gaps in Safeguarding Citrus Industry from B. minax Invasion
The risk of introducing B. minax into other major citrus production regions of the world rises significantly as China expands its fresh citrus market globally, as well as the exponentially increasing number of travelers from and into China. International collaboration is essential to minimize the risk, and smooth the fresh citrus trade and human traffic. Based on the review above, we identified some critical scientific and technological gaps in preventing the invasion of this destructive pest. These gaps include:
9.1. Inadequate Work on Phytosanitary Measures
Although a number of phytosanitary treatment studies of B. minax had been conducted in China, these studies were preliminary and small-scale. Among the measures studied, irradiation shows great promise. International collaborative work between China and the potential import countries is critical to validate the efficacy of the treatment, as well as the potential impact on fruit quality. Significant progress has been made in recent years in understanding the efficacy of irradiation against tephritid fruit flies inside fresh fruits, as well as the impact of irradiation on fruit quality  .
There are not sufficient data to make a decision regarding a cold treatment schedule suitable for B. minax phytosanitary treatment. As discussed earlier, this species might be among the most cold-tolerant Bactrocera fruit fly.
Heat treatment remains an option. Schedule T106-a-4 (43.3˚C for 6 h) results in 100% mortality for Anastrapha species  . However, it is not known if the schedule is effective enough for B. minax. Studies have to be carried out assessing the efficacy as well as impact on fruit quality.
9.2. Lack of Effective Lure for Early Detection and Emergency Response
The US citrus industry has faced a series of severe pest invasions in recent years, and the invasion of B. minax would have a devastating impact on the industry. An effective lure is the first necessary tool once an invasion fruit fly occurs. Many of the successful eradications of invasive Bactrocera in the US can be credited to having potent lures which can detect the invasive pest at very low population levels. In the case of B. minax, the role of an effective lure can be more significant in the early response and eradication program, compared to the invasions of other tephritid fruit flies such as B. dorsalis or Ceratitis capitata. SIT can be deployed for eradication of B. dorsalis or C. capitata. However, there is no case of using SIT for the univoltine, oligophagous tephritid fruit flies such as B. minax, primarily due to the challenge in mass rearing these pests.
This review reveals that there is no effective lure for early detection and emergency response. Unless more potent lures are available, the risk of the pest’s ability to spread and establish the US, as well as in world’s other major citrus regions, is substantial.
9.3. Weak Delimiting and Understanding B. Minax Pest Free Area in China
Since there is no internationally recognized phytosanitary treatment available for B. minax, delimiting B. minax pest free areas can play a critical role in promoting safe trade and safeguarding. B. minax is not reported in four southern citrus provinces in China. However, it is premature to say that these provinces are B. minax pest free areas. Determining B. minax pest free areas can be especially challenging. Trapping for this species is not very effective, so fruit sampling might be necessary to ensure the quality of the survey work. We are not aware that any effort has ever taken in determining B. minax pest free areas in China. This work has to follow an internationally recognized approach such as ISPM No 26  .
Authors wish to thank Drs. Ken Bloem, Karl Suiter, Roger Magarey, Yu Takeuchi, and Ms. Sarah Marnell for technical assistance and/or review this writing. This work is partially funded by USDA―Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service―Plant Protection and Quarantine―Science & Technology.