Back
 IJMPCERO  Vol.7 No.1 , February 2018
Variations in Tomotherapy Beam Outputs: A Multiple-Institutional Investigation
Abstract:
This study aimed to determine variations in tomotherapy beam outputs at multiple institutions. Measurements were obtained at 22 radiotherapy institutions. The first parameter was the absolute dose to water (Dfmsrw, Qmsr) in the machine-specific reference field (fmsr), which indicated a static field in the tomotherapy reference conditions defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) study group. The second measured parameter was the difference between the measured and the planed doses in the intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verification plans, which were created using a solid phantom by the vendor during tomotherapy apparatus installation to adjust the beam output. The IMRT verification plan error at each institution was defined as the systematic error of the beam output; Dfmsrw, Qmsr was subsequently modified. The Dfmsrw, Qmsr values of four institutions with a modified energy fluence per ideal open time (EFIOT) were lower than the values at other institutions. The mean value of all institutions except those four was 0.994 ± 0.013 Gy (range: 0.974 Gy, 1.017 Gy). When the
Dfmsrw, Qmsr value was corrected by the IMRT verification error, this variation decreased. In addition, the mean IMRT verification errors in the TomoDirectTM and TomoHelicalTM modes with the TomoEDGETM mode were 1.2% ± 0.8% (range: -0.6%, 1.8%) and 0.2% ± 0.5% (range: -0.6%, 0.9%), respectively (p < 0.05). Those without the TomoEDGE mode were 0.6% ± 1.0% (range: -1.0%, 1.7%) and -0.7% ± 0.7% (range: -2.3%, 0.4%), respectively (p < 0.001). The variations in tomotherapy beam output across multiple facilities were very low, except at facilities where the EFIOT was modified. The beam output was affected by the mode (e.g., TomoHelical), and it would be recommended to investigate the difference of the beam output due to differences in the mode in order to equalize the beam output.
Cite this paper: Shimizu, H. , Sasaki, K. , Sugi, K. , Fukuma, H. , Nakabayashi, T. , Isomura, T. , Tachibana, H. and Kodaira, T. (2018) Variations in Tomotherapy Beam Outputs: A Multiple-Institutional Investigation. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 7, 87-99. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2018.71008.
References

[1]   Mackie, T.R. (2016) History of Tomotherapy. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 51, R427-R453.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R24

[2]   Alfonso, R., Andreo, P., Capote, R., Huq, M.S., Kilby, W., Kjäll, P., Mackie, T.R., Palmans, H., Rosser, K., Seuntjens, J., Ullrich, W. and Vatnitsky, S. (2008) A New Formalism for Reference Dosimetry of Small and Nonstandard Fields. Medical Physics, 35, 5179-5186.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3005481

[3]   Schiefer, H., Buchauer, K., Heinze, S., Henke, G. and Plasswilm, L. (2015) Design and Implementation of a “Cheese” Phantom-Based Tomotherapy TLD Dose Intercomparison. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 191, 855-861.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-015-0850-2

[4]   Izewska, J., Svensson, H. and Ibbott, G. (2002) Worldwide Quality Assurance Networks for Radiotherapy Dosimetry. Standards and Codes of Practice in Medical Radiation Dosimetry. Proceedings of an International Symposium, 2, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

[5]   Izewska, J., Georg, D., Bera, P., Thwaites, D., Arib, M., Saravi, M., Sergieva, K., Li, K., Yip, F.G., Mahant, A.K. and Bulski, W. (2007) A Methodology for TLD Postal Dosimetry Audit of High-Energy Radiotherapy Photon Beams in Non-Reference Conditions. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 84, 67-74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.06.006

[6]   Ebert, M.A., Howlett, S.J., Harrison, K., Cornes, D., Hamilton, C.S. and Denham, J.D. (2008) Linear-Accelerator X-Ray Output: A Multicentre Chamber-Based Intercomparison Study in Australia and New Zealand. Australasian Physical and Engineering Science in Medicine, 31, 268-279.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178596

[7]   Kim, J.I., Chung, J.B., Park, Y.K., Song, J.Y., Kim, S.K., Ahn, S.H., Choi, C.H., Choi ,W.H., Cho, B., Ju, S.G., Kim, S.J. and Ye, S.J. (2013) A Multi-Institutional Study for Tolerance and Action Levels of IMRT Dose Quality assurance Measurements in Korea. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 14, 3964.
https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.3964

[8]   Ferreira, I.H., Dutreix, A., Bridier, A., Chavaudra, J. and Svensson, H. (2000) The ESTRO-Quality Assurance Network (EQUAL). Radiotherapy and Oncology, 55, 273-284.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00101-2

[9]   Gillis, S., De Wagter, C., Bohsung, J., Perrin, B., Williams, P. and Mijnheer, B.J. (2005) An Inter-Centre Quality Assurance Network for IMRT Verification: Results of the ESTRO QUASIMODO Project. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 76, 340-353.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.021

[10]   Lye, J., Kenny, J., Lehmann, J., Dunn, L., Kron, T., Alves, A., Cole, A. and Williams, I. (2014) A 2D Ion Chamber Array Audit of Wedged and Asymmetric Fields in an Inhomogeneous Lung Phantom. Medical Physics, 41, 101712.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4896097

[11]   Kumar, R., Sharma, S.D., Deshpande, S., Sresty, N.V., Bhatt, C.P., Amols, H.I., Chourasiya, G. and Mayya, Y.S. (2014) Analysis of Patient Specific Dosimetry Quality Assurance Measurements in Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy: A Multi Centre Study. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 10, 611-617.

[12]   Mizuno, H., Fukumura, A., Fukahori, M., Sakata, S., Yamashita, W., Takase, N., Yajima, K., Katayose, T., Abe-Sakama, K., Kusano, Y., Shimbo, M. and Kanai, T. (2014) Application of a Radiophotoluminescent Glass Dosimeter to Nonreference Condition Dosimetry in the Postal Dose Audit System. Medical Physics, 41, 112104.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4898596

[13]   Budgell, G., Berresford, J., Trainer, M., Bradshaw, E., Sharpe, P. and Williams, P. (2011) A National Dosimetric Audit of IMRT. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 99, 246-252.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.03.016

[14]   Clark, C.H., Hansen, V.N., Chantler, H., Edwards, C., James, H.V., Webster, G., Miles, E.A., Guerrero Urbano, M.T., Bhide, S.A., Bidmead, A.M. and Nutting, C.M. (2009) Dosimetry Audit for a Multi-Centre IMRT Head and Neck Trial. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 93, 102-108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.025

[15]   Kinhikar, R.A., Jamema, S.V., Reenadevi, P.R, Zubin, M., Gupta, T., Dhote, D.S., Deshpande, D.D., Shrivastava, S.K. and Sarin, R. (2009) Dosimetric Validation of First Helical Tomotherapy Hi-Art II Machine in India. Journal of Medical Physics, 34, 23-30.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.48717

[16]   Jeraj, R., Mackie, T.R., Balog, J. and Olivera, G. (2005) Dose Calibration of Nonconventional Treatment Systems Applied to Helical Tomotherapy. Medical Physics, 32, 570-577.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1855015

[17]   Andreo, P. (2000) Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry Based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water. IAEA Technical Report Series No. 398, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

[18]   Japan Society of Medical Physics (2012) Standard Dosimetry of Absorbed Dose to Water in External Beam Radiotherapy (Standard Dosimetry 12). Tsusho-Sangyo Kenkyu-Sha.

[19]   Hashimoyo, H., Omura, M., Matsui, K., Mukai, Y., Hongo, H., Yamakabe, W., Saito, K. and Yoshida, M. (2015) Tangent Field Technique of TomoDirect Improves Dose Distribution for Whole-Breast Irradiation. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 16, 5369.

[20]   Sugie, C., Manabe, Y., Hayashi, A., Murai, T., Takaoka, T., Hattori, Y., Iwata, H., Takenaka, R. and Shibamoto, Y. (2015) Efficacy of the Dynamic Jaw Mode in Helical Tomotherapy with Static Ports for Breast Cancer. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, 14, 459-465.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1533034614558746

[21]   Muir, B.R. (2015) Ion Chamber Absorbed Dose Calibration Coefficients, ND,w, Measured at ADCLs: Distribution Analysis and Stability. Medical Physics, 42, 1546-1554.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4914381

[22]   McEwen, M., DeWerd, L., Ibbott, G., Followill, D., Rogers, D.W., Seltzer, S. and Seuntjens, J. (2014) Addendum to the AAPM’s TG-51 Protocol for Clinical Reference Dosimetry of High-Energy Photon Beams. Medical Physics, 41, Article ID: 041501.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4866223

[23]   De Ost, B., Schaeken, B., Vynckier, S., Sterpin, E. and Van den Weyngaert, D. (2011) Reference Dosimetry for Helical Tomotherapy: Practical Implementation and a Multicenter Validation. Medical Physics, 38, 6020-6026.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3651496

[24]   Kinhikar, R.A. (2008) Multileaf Collimator Transmission from the First Hi-Art II Helical Tomotherapy Machine in India. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 4, 88-90.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.42255

[25]   Sandra, C.L. (2011) Dose Optimization in TomoTherapy. EPU-HEGP.

[26]   Accuray (2014) 1d-Beam Model and Machine Settings.

 
 
Top