Back
 JEP  Vol.9 No.2 , February 2018
Spatial Distribution of Fuel Models Based on the Conditional-Fuel-Loading Concept
Abstract: Fuel model mapping has followed in general two trends: 1) indirect inferences, where some factors, presumably associated with fuel production, are related to a given fuel model; and 2) experts consulting, which has been used to classify and to validate other people classifications. However, reliance on expert judgment implies a subjective approach. Thus, I propone the integration of geostatistic techniques and the Conditional-Fuels-Loading concept (CFL) to define a more objective perspective in the fuel-model mapping. The information used in this study was collected in a forest of Chihuahua, Mexico, where fuels were inventoried in 554 (1000 m2) sample plots. These sample plots were classified using the CFL; and ordinary kriging (Gaussian, spherical and exponential) was used to interpolate the fuel-model values. Using the Akaike’s Information Criterion the spherical model performed best. The methodology allowed a finer definition of spatial distribution of fuel models. Some advantages of the CFL are: 1) it is based on actual fuel loads, and not only on vegetation structure and composition; 2) it is objective and avoids the bias of different classifiers (experts); and 3) it avoids the need of the advice of experts.
Cite this paper: Garnica, J. (2018) Spatial Distribution of Fuel Models Based on the Conditional-Fuel-Loading Concept. Journal of Environmental Protection, 9, 111-121. doi: 10.4236/jep.2018.92009.
References

[1]   Stephens, S.L. and Ruth, L.W. (2005) Federal Forest-Fire Policy in the United States. Ecological Applications, 15, 532-542.
https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0545

[2]   Hann, W.J. and Bunnell, D.L. (2001) Fire and Land Management Planning and Implementation across Multiple Scales. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 10, 389-403.
https://doi.org/10.1071/WF01037

[3]   Finney, M.A. (2004) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-Model Development and Evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Research Paper RMRS-RP-4, 47 p.

[4]   Keane, R.E., Burgan, R. and van Wagtendok, J. (2001) Mapping Wildland Fuels for Fire Management across Multiple Scales: Integ Rating Remote Sensing, GIS, and Biophysical Modeling. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 10, 301-319.
https://doi.org/10.1071/WF01028

[5]   Keane, R.E., Mincemoyer, S.A., Schmidt, K.M., Long, D.G. and Garner, J.L. (1999) Mapping Vegetation and Fuels for Fire Management on the Gila National Forest Complex, New Mexico. USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-46-CD, 126 p.

[6]   Chuvieco, E. and Salas, J. (1996) Mapping the Spatial Distribution of Forest Fire Danger Using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 10, 333-345.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799608902082

[7]   Valdez, L.J.R. (2001) Optimal Spatial Location of Forest Fuel Management Activities. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 124 p.

[8]   Arroyo, L.A., Pascual, C. and Manzanera, J.A. (2008) Fire Models and Methods to Map Fuel Types: The Role of Remote Sensing. Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 1239-1252.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.048

[9]   Reich, R.M., Lundquist, J.E. and Bravo, V.A. (2004) Spatial Models for Estimating Fuel Loads in the Black Hills, South Dakota, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 13, 119-129.
https://doi.org/10.1071/WF02049

[10]   Flore, G.J.G. (2001) Modeling the Spatial Variability of Forest Fuel Arrays. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State University, For Collins, 184 p.

[11]   Flores, G. (Unpublished) The Conditional-Fuels-Loading Concept as an Alternative to Evaluate the Accuracy of Fuel-Model Classifications.

[12]   Sikkink, P.G. and Keane, R.E. (2008) A Comparison of Five Sampling Techniques to Estimate Surface Fuel Loading in Montane Forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 17, 363-379.
https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07003

[13]   Kennard, D.K. and Outcalt, K. (2006) Modeling Spatial Patterns of Fuels and Fire Behavior in a Longleaf Pine Forest in the Southeastern USA. Fire Ecology, 2, 31-52.
https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0201031

[14]   Robichaud, P.R. (1997) Geostatistics: A New Tool for Describing Spatially-Varied Surface Conditions from Timber Harvested and Burned Hillslopes. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Paper No. 97, 136 p.

[15]   Burrough, P.A. and MacDonnell (1998) Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Clarendon Press Oxford, Oxford, 333 p.

[16]   Pierce, K.B., Ohmann, J.L., Wimberly, M.C., Gregory, M.J. and Friedd, J.S. (2009) Mapping Wildland Fuels and Forest Structure for Land Management: A Comparison of Nearest Neighbor Imputation and Other Methods. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39, 1901-1916.
https://doi.org/10.1139/X09-102

[17]   Bååtha, H., Gällerspångb, A., Hallsbyc, G., Lundströma, A., Löfgrena, P., Nilssona, M. and Ståhla, G. (2002) Remote Sensing, Field Survey, and Long-Term Forecasting: An Efficient Combination for Local Assessments of Forest Fuels. Biomass and Bioenergy, 22, 145-157.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00065-4

[18]   UCODEFO-2 (1997) Aplicación del inventario forestal continuo (I.F.C.) en los bosques del “Ejido El Largo”, Chihuahua, México. Unidad de Conservación y Desarrollo Forestal No. 2, 35 p.

[19]   Brown, J.K., Oberheu, R.D. and Johnston, C.M. (1982) Handbook for Inventorying Surface Fuels and Biomass in the Interior West. USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report INT-129, 48 p.

[20]   Anderson, H.E. (1982) Aids to Determining Fuel Models for Estimating Fire Behavior. USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report INT-122, 22 p.

[21]   International Fire Service Training Association (1998) Fundamentals of Wildland Fire Fighting. 3rd Edition, Fire Protection Publications, 472 p.

[22]   Andrews, P.L. (1986) BEHAVE: Fire Behavior Prediction and Fuel Modeling System-BURN Subsystem. Part I. USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report INT-194, 130 p.

[23]   Hunner, G. (2000) Modeling Forest Stand Structure using Geostatistics, Geographic Information Systems, and Remote Sensing. Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 218 p.

[24]   Isaaks, E.H. and Srivastava, R.M. (1989) An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, 592 p.

[25]   Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. (2003) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd Edition, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 488 p.

[26]   Kalkhan, M.A., Reich, R.M. and Czaplewski, R.L. (1996) Statistical Properties of Measures of Association and the Kappa Statistic for Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data using Double Sampling. In: Todd, M.H., Czaplewski, R.L. and Hamre, R.H., Eds., Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium: Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, USDA Forest Service GTR-277, 467-476.

[27]   Fulé, P.Z. and Covington, W.W. (1994) Double Sampling Increases the Efficiency of Forest Floor Inventories for Arizona Ponderosa Pine Forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 4, 3-10.
https://doi.org/10.1071/WF9940003

 
 
Top