Back
 OJOG  Vol.8 No.2 , February 2018
Erratum to “Routine Episiotomy Practice at a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia” [Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 6 (2016) 794-797]
Abstract: The original online version of this article (Oraif, A. (2016) Routine Episiotomy Practice at a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6, 794-797. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2016.613097) was published without the coauthors mistakenly. To reflect the contribution and responsibility of the coauthors at the time of the study, we revised authorship and affiliation of the article.
Keywords: Erratum
Cite this paper: Oraif, A. , Alfattni, A. , Alama, A. , Hawari, A. , Al Subhi, Y. and Alghanmi, H. (2018) Erratum to “Routine Episiotomy Practice at a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia” [Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 6 (2016) 794-797]. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 8, 105-105. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2018.82013.
References

[1]   Thacker, S.B. and Banta, H.D. (1983) Benefits and Risks of Episiotomy: An Interpretative Review of the English Language Literature, 1860-1980. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 38, 322-338.

[2]   Larsson, P.G., Platz-Christensen, J.J., Bergman, B. and Wallstersson, G. (1991) Advantage or Disadvantage of Episiotomy Compared with Spontaneous Perineal Laceration. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 31, 213-216.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000293161

[3]   ACOG (2006) Episiotomy (Practice Bulletin #71). Obstetrics & Gynecology, 107, 957-962.

[4]   Saadia, Z. (2014) Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics—A Study from Saudi Arabia. Mater Sociomed, 26, 188-190.

[5]   Al-Ghammari, K., Al-Riyami, Z., Al-Moqbali, M., Al-Marjabi, F., Al-Mahrouqi, B., Al-Khatri, A. and Al-Khasawneh, E.M. (2016) Predictors of Routine Episiotomy in Primigravida Women in Oman. Applied Nursing Research, 29, 131-135.

[6]   Reinbold, D., Eboue, C., Morello, R., Lamendour, N., Herlicoviez, M. and Dreyfus, M. (2012) From the Impact of French Guidelines to Reduce Episiotomy’s Rate. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction (Paris), 41, 62-68.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.08.006

[7]   London: Department of Health (1997) Department of Health, NHS Maternity Statistics, England 1989-90 to 1994-5.

[8]   Rockner, G. and Olund, A. (1991) The Use of Episiotomy in Primiparas in Sweden. A Descriptive Study with Particular Focus on Two Hospitals. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 70, 325-330.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016349109007881

[9]   Argentine Episiotomy Trial Collaborative Group. Routine vs Selective Episiotomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet, 1517-1518.

[10]   Kaufman, S.C. (1992) Episiotomy. To Cut or Not to Cut? Online J Curr Clin Trials Doc, 16.

[11]   Liljestrand, J. Episiotomy for Vaginal Birth: RHL Commentary (2003) The WHO Reproductive Health Library. World Health Organization, Geneva.

[12]   Hartmann, K., Viswanathan, M., Palmieri, R., Gartlehner, G., Thorp, J. and Lohr, K.N. (2005) Outcomes of Routine Episiotomy: A Systematic Review. JAMA, 293, 2141-2148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.17.2141

 
 
Top