PSYCH  Vol.2 No.7 , October 2011
The Analysis of Attachment Styles through Interpersonal Circumplex Description
ABSTRACT
The study explored how the dyads with different attachment s behave towards Leary’s circumplex in coop- erative and competitive tasks. 100 strangers as a sample were surveyed through two experiments on computer, by using RBQ (Riverside Behavioral Q-sort) to examine their interpersonal traits through rated by experimenters. Relation Questionnaire (RQ) and ECR were also used to measure their attachment s. There are three con- clusions based on the results of this study that: 1) Individuals of different attachment s in interpersonal in- teraction had shown different trend of interpersonal s; 2) Individuals of different attachment s take up different area in interpersonal circumplex, which proves that it is continuous not discrete of interpersonal at- tachment ; 3) the dyads in different sex of different attachment types showed different satisfaction in these two tasks.

Cite this paper
nullXue, W. & Zhao, S. (2011). The Analysis of Attachment Styles through Interpersonal Circumplex Description. Psychology, 2, 665-668. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.27101.
References
[1]   Gallo, L. C. et al. (2003). An interpersonal analysis of adult attachment style: Circumplex descriptions, recalled developmental experiences, self-representations and interpersonal functioning in adulthood. Journal of Personality, 71, 141-182. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.7102003

[2]   Li, T. G. (2005). Attachment and memory for emotional events. Journal of Peking University, 41, 965-974.

[3]   Ansell, E. B., Kurtz, J. E., & Markey, P. M. (2008). Gender differences in interpersonal complementarity within roommate dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 502-512. doi:10.1177/0146167207312312

[4]   Gurtman, M. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2000). Interpersonal adjective scales: Confirmation of circumplex structure from multiple perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 374-384. doi:10.1177/0146167200265009

[5]   Markey, P. M., Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2003). Complementarity

[6]   of interpersonal behaviors in dyadic interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 1082-1090.

[7]   Mayseless, O., & Scharf, M. (2007). Adolescents’ attachment representations and their capacity for intimacy in close relationships. Journal of research on adolescence, 17, 23-50.

[8]   Sadler, P., & Woody, E. (2003). Is who you are who you’re talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 80-96. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.02.002

[9]   Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

[10]   Zimmermann, P. (2004). Attachment representations and characteristics of friendship relations during adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 83-101. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.02.002

 
 
Top