Back
 TEL  Vol.8 No.1 , February 2018
When Utility Jumps: The Value of Having Cash in the Hand
Abstract: Different theoretical explanations have been developed for seemingly inconsistent actions that deal with varying levels of risk and time. We propose a simple model of utility that unifies these seemingly separate phenomena, while not departing too far from the standard models of utility maximization already in use. Our driving assumption is that preferences over riskier outcomes discontinuously depart from preferences under certainty; a jump from no risk to some risk is fundamentally different from a movement of some risk to more risk.
Cite this paper: Rotthoff, K. and Coffey, B. (2018) When Utility Jumps: The Value of Having Cash in the Hand. Theoretical Economics Letters, 8, 72-78. doi: 10.4236/tel.2018.81004.
References

[1]   Andreoni, J. and Sprenger, C. (2012) Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences. American Economic Review, 102, 3357-3376.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.7.3357

[2]   Friedman, M. and Savage, L.J. (1948) The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk. The Journal of Political Economy, 56, 279-304.

[3]   Phelps, E. and Pollak, R. (1968) On Second-Best National Saving and Game-Equilibrium Growth. Review of Economic Studies, 35, 185-199.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2296547

[4]   Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.

[5]   Laibson, D. (1997) Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 443-477.

[6]   O’Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M. (1999) Doing It Now or Later. The American Economic Review, 89, 1030-1124.

[7]   Benhabib, J., Bisin, A. and Schotter, A. (2010) Present-Bias, Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting, and Fixed Costs. Games and Economic Behavior, 69, 205-223.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2009.11.003

 
 
Top