AS  Vol.9 No.1 , January 2018
Planting Geometry Effects on the Growth and Yield of Dryland Cotton
Abstract: The declining Ogallala Aquifer beneath the Southern High Plains may necessitate dryland crop production and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a well-adapted and potentially profitable alternative crop. The limited growing season duration of the Texas Panhandle and southwestern Kansas, however, imposes significant production risk due to incomplete boll maturation. Emphasizing earlier boll production that is usually confined to sites on lower fruiting branches may reduce risk, but offsetting high planting densities are needed to maintain desirable lint yield. Our objectives were to quantify planting: 1) row width and 2) in-row spacing effects on growth, yield, and fiber quality of dryland cotton. Field tests of row widths from 0.25 to 0.76 m and plant densities with in-row spacing ranging from 0.075 to 0.15 m were conducted from 1999 to 2005 on a nearly level Pullman clay loam (fine, mixed, superactive, thermic Torrertic Paleustoll) managed in a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), cotton, fallow (W-Ctn-F) rotation. To expand the basis of comparison, cotton growth and yields were simulated using GOSSYM and long-term (1958-2000) weather records from Bushland, TX, as input for all combinations of 0.38 or 0.76 m row widths and plant spacing of 0.075, 0.10 and 0.15 m. Experimental and computer simulated plant height and harvested boll number increased significantly with increased row spacing and, occasionally, in-row plant spacing. Modeled lint yield for 0.38 m rows decreased by approximately 50% compared with the 582 kg·ha-1 yield for conventional row spacing, which was practically duplicated by field observations in 2001 and 2004. Measured fiber quality occasionally improved with conventional row spacing over ultra-narrow rows, but was unaffected by plant spacing. Because narrow rows and frequent plant spacing did not improve lint yield or fiber quality of dryland cotton, we do not recommend this strategy to overcome a thermally limited growing season.
Cite this paper: Baumhardt, R. , Schwartz, R. , Marek, G. and Bell, J. (2018) Planting Geometry Effects on the Growth and Yield of Dryland Cotton. Agricultural Sciences, 9, 99-116. doi: 10.4236/as.2018.91008.

[1]   Follett, R.F., Stewart, C.E., Pruessner, E.G. and Kimble, J.M. (2012) Effects of Climate Change on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Storage in the US Great Plains. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 67, 331-342.

[2]   Stewart, B.A. (2003) Aquifers, Ogallala. In: Stewart, B.A. and Howell, T.A., Eds., Encyclopedia of Water Science, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 43-44.

[3]   McGuire, V.L. (2017) Water-Level and Recoverable Water in Storage Changes, High Plains Aquifer, Predevelopment to 2015 and 2013-15. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017-5040, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 14 p.

[4]   Wanjura, D.F. and Newton, O.H. (1981) Modeling Cotton Lint Development. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 24, 496-499.

[5]   Bynum, J.B. and Cothren, J.T. (2008) Indicators of Last Effective Boll Population and Harvest Aide Timing in Cotton. Agronomy Journal, 100, 1106-1111.

[6]   Gowda, P.H., Baumhardt, R.L., Esparza, A.M., Marek, T.H. and Howell, T.A. (2007) Suitability of Cotton as an Alternative Crop in the Ogallala Aquifer Region. Agronomy Journal, 99, 1397-1403.

[7]   Stewart, B.A. and Peterson, G.A. (2015) Managing Green Water in Dryland Agriculture. Agronomy Journal, 107, 1544-1553.

[8]   Bilbro, J.D. (1981) Spatial Responses of Contrasting Cotton Cultivars Grown under Semiarid Conditions. Agronomy Journal, 73, 271-277.

[9]   Bednarz, C.W., Bridges, D.C. and Brown, S.M. (2000) Analysis of Cotton Yield Stability across Population Densities. Agronomy Journal, 92, 128-135.

[10]   Kimura, E., Ramirez, J.H., Adams, C., Thapa, S. and DeLaune P. (2017) Cotton Growth, Lint Yield, and Fiber Quality as Influenced by Seeding Rates under Dryland and Irrigation in the Rolling Plains of Texas. Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Production Conference, Technical Paper, Dallas, TX, 4-6 January 2017, 92-95.

[11]   Gerik, T.J., Lemon, R.G., Faver, K.L., Hoelewyn, T.A. and Jungman. M. (1998) Performance of Ultra-Narrow Row Cotton in Central Texas. Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Production Conference, Technical Paper, San Diego, CA, 5-9 January 1998, 1406-1409.

[12]   Gwathmey, C.O., Steckel, L.E., Larson, J.A. and Mooney, D.F. (2011) Lower Limits of Cotton Seeding Rates in Alternative Row Widths and Patterns. Agronomy Journal, 103, 584-592.

[13]   Boquet, D.J. (2005) Cotton in Ultra-Narrow Row Spacing: Plant Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates. Agronomy Journal, 97, 279-287.

[14]   Gwathmey, C.O. and Clement, J.D. (2010) Alteration of Cotton Source-Sink Relations with Plant Population Density and Mepiquat Chloride. Field Crops Research, 116, 101-107.

[15]   Vories, E.D. and Glover, R.E. (2006) Comparison of Growth and Yield Components of Conventional and Ultra-Narrow Row Cotton. Journal of Cotton Science, 10, 235-243.

[16]   Balkcom, K.S., Price, A.J., Van Santen, E., Delaney, D.P., Boykin, D.L., Arriaga, F.J., Bergtold, J.S., Kornecki, T.S. and Raper, R.L. (2010) Row Spacing, Tillage System, and Herbicide Technology Affects Cotton Plant Growth and Yield. Field Crops Research, 117, 219-225.

[17]   Unger, P.W. and Pringle, F.B. (1981) Pullman Soils: Distribution Importance, Variability, and Management. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bulletin, B-1372, College Station.

[18]   Schwartz, R.C., Baumhardt, R.L., Scanlon, B.R., Bell, J.M., Davis, R.G., Ibragimov, N., Jones, O.R. and Reedy, R.C. (2015) Long-Term Changes in Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen under Semiarid Tillage and Cropping Practices. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 79, 1771-1781.

[19]   Baumhardt, R.L., Schwartz, R.C., Jones, O.R., Scanlon, B.R., Reedy, R.C. and Marek, G.W. (2017) Long-Term Conventional and No-Tillage Effects on Field Hydrology and Yields of a Dryland Crop Rotation. Soil Science Society America Journal, 81, 200-209.

[20]   Morrow, M.R. and Krieg, D.R. (1990) Cotton Management Strategies for a Short Growing Season Environment: Water-Nitrogen Considerations. Agronomy Journal, 82, 52-56.

[21]   Johnson, W.C., Skidmore, E.L., Tucker, B.B. and Unger, P.W. (1983) Soil Conservation: Central Great Plains Winter Wheat and Range Region. In: Dregne, H.E. and Willis, W.O., Eds., Dryland Agriculture Agronomy Monograph No. 23, American Society Agronomy, Madison, 197-217.

[22]   Eck, H.V. (1969) Restoring Productivity on Pullman Silty Clay Loam Subsoil under Limited Moisture. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 33, 578-581.

[23]   Eck, H.V. (1988) Winter Wheat Response to Nitrogen and Irrigation. Agronomy Journal, 80, 902-908.

[24]   Jones, O.R., Hauser, V.L. and Popham, T.W. (1994) No-Tillage Effects on Infiltration, Runoff and Water Conservation on Dryland. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 37, 473-479.

[25]   Milliken, G.A. and Johnson, D.E. (2009) Analysis of Messy Data Vol. 1 Designed Experiments. 2nd Edition, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton.

[26]   SAS Inst. Inc. (2004) SAS Online Doc 9.1.3. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary.

[27]   Baker, D.N., Lambert, J.R. and McKinion, J.M. (1983) GOSSYM: A Simulator of Cotton Crop Growth and Yield. South Carolina Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 1089, Clemson Univ., Clemson.

[28]   Reddy, K.R., Kakani, V.G., McKinion, J.M. and Baker, D.N. (2002) Applications of a Cotton Simulation Model, GOSSYM, for Crop Management, Economic and Policy Decisions. In: Ahuja, L.R., et al., Eds., Agricultural System Models in Field Research and Technology Transfer, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 33-73.

[29]   Staggenborg, S.A., Lascano, R.J. and Krieg, D.R. (1996) Determining Cotton Water Use in a Semiarid Climate with the GOSSYM Cotton Simulation Model. Agronomy Journal, 88, 740-745.

[30]   Baumhardt, R.L., Lascano, R.J. and Krieg, D.R. (1995) The Physical and Hydraulic Properties of a Pullman and Amarillo Soil on the Texas South Plains. Tech. Rep. 95-1, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock.

[31]   Baumhardt, R.L., Mauget, S.A., Gowda, P.H. and Brauer, D.K. (2014) Modeling Cotton Lint Yield Response to Irrigation Management as Influenced by El Nino-Southern Oscillation. Agronomy Journal, 106, 1559-1568.

[32]   Jost, P.H. and Cothren, J.T. (2001) Phenotypic Alterations and Crop Maturity Differences in Ultra-Narrow Row and Conventionally Spaced Cotton. Crop Science, 41, 1150-1159.

[33]   Brodrick, R., Bange, M.P., Milroy, S.P. and Hammer, G.L. (2010) Yield and Maturity of Ultra-Narrow Row Cotton in High Input Production Systems. Agronomy Journal, 102, 843-848.

[34]   Clawson, E.L., Cothren, J.T. and Blouin, D.C. (2006) Nitrogen Fertilization and Yield of Cotton in Ultra-Narrow and Conventional Row Spacing. Agronomy Journal, 98, 72-79.

[35]   Reddy, V.R., Reddy, K.R., Sailaja, K., Richardson, A.G., Kakani, V.G. and Zhao, D. (2003) Cotton Modeling: Advances and Gaps in Our Ability to Assess Climate Change, Crop Management, Economic and Environmental Policy Decisions. Proceedings World Cotton Research Conference, Technical Paper, Cape Town, 9-13 March 2003, 882-895.

[36]   Lokhande, S.B. and Reddy, K.R. (2015) Cotton Reproductive and Fiber Quality Responses to Nitrogen Nutrition. International Journal of Plant Production, 9, 191-210.