AJIBM  Vol.8 No.1 , January 2018
The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Scope of Triangle Model
Abstract: Society-Economy-Environment” made up the triangle model of corporate sustainable growth. The internal value and connection of the nodes in the model are driving the corporate to make different choices in the pursuit of benefits. The fundamental need for corporate sustainable growth is to balance different values. This paper believes that in the scope of the triangle model of the corporate sustainable growth, corporate social responsibility has an equilibrium function, which can help the corporate maintain a relatively stable status when facing conflicts against the bottom line. This paper briefly discussed the equilibrium function of the corporate social responsibility and the meaning of investing in CSR, by combing through the development and changes for corporate social responsibility, and by studying the case of a power plant shutdown to analyze the conflicts among the three nodes of its value triangle.
Cite this paper: He, J. (2018) The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Scope of Triangle Model. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 8, 59-68. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2018.81004.

[1]   Cai, J.J. (2011) Sustainable Science of Environment and Resources. Foreign Social Sciences, No. 3, 42-49.

[2]   Yang, Y.H. (2005) The Development of CSR Perspective. Economic Aspect, No. 7, 55-58.

[3]   Zhou, Z. (2014) Corporate Ethical Responsibility—Which Is on the Core Position of Corporate Social Responsibility. Management Journal, No. 11, 1663-1670.

[4]   Painter-Morland, M. (2006) Triple Bottom-Line Reporting as Social Grammar: Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Codes of Conduct. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 352-364.

[5]   Wang, Q. Current Situation and Counter Measures of Information Disclosure of Enterprises Based on Triple Bottom Line.

[6]   Long, C.Z. (2014) The Construction of the Research Model of Sustainable Entrepreneurial Context. Technological Progress and Countermeasures, No. 19, 14-19.

[7]   Guo, Y.J., Zhang, Y.Y. and Zhao, H.Y. (2014) The Effectiveness of Self-Regulation in Corporate Social Responsibility—A Game Analysis Based on the Relationship between Enterprises and Consumers. Soft Science, 28, 78-81.

[8]   Kong, L. (2017) Defining the Intensity Interval of Environmental Regulation to Promote Industrial Transformation and Upgrading: An Empirical Study of Provincial Panel Data. Management Modernization, No. 1, 15-17.

[9]   Tang, J.R. (2016) Research on the Driving Force of SME Technology Innovation Based on CSR Perspective. Management Modernization, No. 5, 55-57.

[10]   Hui, L. (2013) The Mode Choice of the Coupling of Government Social Regulation and CSR. Management Modernization, No. 5, 1-3.

[11]   Wang, G.Y. and Wang, P.C. (2017) The Application of Behavioral and Neurological Experiments in the Reform of State-Owned Enterprises. Future and Development, No. 4, 46-51.

[12]   Xu, H.M. and Hi, F.P. (2013) Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance—The Moderating Effect of Market Development and Government Ownership. China’s Circulation Economy, 27, 90-95.