Back
 MSA  Vol.9 No.1 , January 2018
Surface Roughness Quality and Dimensional Accuracy—A Comprehensive Analysis of 100% Infill Printed Parts Fabricated by a Personal/Desktop Cost-Effective FDM 3D Printer
Abstract: Fused deposition modeling (FDM) has become widely used for personal/ desktop cost-effective printers. This work presents an investigational platform, which is used to study the surface roughness quality, and dimensional accuracy of 100% infill density printed parts fabricated by a personal/desktop cost-effective FDM 3D printer using different types of thermoplastic filament materials namely, PLA, PLA+, ABS and ABS+. Varieties of experiments were conducted after the fabricated parts were naturally cooled down for at least three hours to room temperature. During printing work, the nozzle diameter, layer height, nozzle temperature and printing speed were set at 0.3 mm, 0.1 mm, 220°C and 30 mm/s, respectively. According to the experimentally obtained data results over 10 mm scanned profile and 90° measuring direction (perpendicular to building direction), PLA+ thermoplastic filament material shows an excellent surface behaviour and is found to be more accurate while ABS does exhibit high surface roughness, waviness and primary behaviour. Both PLA and ABS+ show good surface performance.
Cite this paper: Alsoufi, M. and Elsayed, A. (2018) Surface Roughness Quality and Dimensional Accuracy—A Comprehensive Analysis of 100% Infill Printed Parts Fabricated by a Personal/Desktop Cost-Effective FDM 3D Printer. Materials Sciences and Applications, 9, 11-40. doi: 10.4236/msa.2018.91002.
References

[1]   Tay, Y.W.D., et al. (2017) 3D Printing Trends in Building and Construction Industry: A Review. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 12, 261-276.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2017.1326724

[2]   Hashemi Sanatgar, R., Campagne, C. and Nierstrasz, V. (2017) Investigation of the Adhesion Properties of Direct 3D Printing of Polymers and Nanocomposites on Textiles: Effect of FDM Printing Process Parameters. Applied Surface Science, 403, 551-563.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.112

[3]   Abdullah, A.M., et al. (2017) Mechanical and Physical Properties of Highly ZrO2/β- TCP Filled Polyamide 12 Prepared via Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) 3D Printer for Potential Craniofacial Reconstruction Application. Materials Letters, 189, 307-309.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.11.052

[4]   Mohamed, O.A., Masood, S.H. and Bhowmik, J.L. (2016) Mathematical Modeling and FDM Process Parameters Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology Based on Q-Optimal Design. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40, 10052-10073.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.06.055

[5]   Williams, R.E., et al. (1996) Investigation of the Effect of Various Build Methods on the Performance of Rapid Prototyping (Stereolithography). Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 61, 173-178.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(96)02483-1

[6]   Jin, Y.-A., et al. (2015) Quantitative Analysis of Surface Profile in Fused Deposition Modelling. Additive Manufacturing, 8, 142-148.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.10.001

[7]   Galantucci, L.M., Lavecchia, F. and Percoco, G. (2009) Experimental Study Aiming to Enhance the Surface Finish of Fused Deposition Modeled Parts. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, 58, 189-192.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.071

[8]   He, Y., Xue, G.-H. and Fu, J.-Z. (2014) Fabrication of Low Cost Soft Tissue Pros- Theses with the Desktop 3D Printer. Journal name, 4, 6973.

[9]   Gu, P. and Li, L. (2002) Fabrication of Biomedical Prototypes with Locally Controlled Properties Using FDM. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 51, 181-184.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61495-4

[10]   Centola, M., et al. (2010) Combining Electrospinning and Fused Deposition Modeling for the Fabrication of a Hybrid Vascular Graft. Biofabrication, 2, Article ID: 014102.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/014102

[11]   Karamooz Ravari, M.R., et al. (2014) Numerical Investigation on Mechanical Properties of Cellular Lattice Structures Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 88, 154-161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.08.009

[12]   Schantz, J.-T., et al. (2005) Osteo-genic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells in Computer Designed Fibrin-Polymer-Ceramic Scaffolds Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 16, 807-819.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.08.006

[13]   Chen, Z., et al. (2005) Fabrication of Osteo-Structure Analogous Scaffolds via Fused Deposition Modeling. Scripta Materialia, 52, 157-161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.08.006

[14]   Ahn, D., et al. (2009) Representation of Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209, 5593-5600.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.016

[15]   Carneiro, O.S., Silva, A.F. and Gomes, R. (2015) Fused Deposition Modeling with Polypropylene. Materials & Design, 83, 768-776.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.053

[16]   Casavola, C., et al. (2016) Orthotropic Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modelling Parts Described by Classical Laminate Theory. Materials & Design, 90, 453-458.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.009

[17]   Smith, W.C. and Dean, R.W. (2013) Structural Characteristics of Fused Deposition Modeling Polycarbonate Material. Polymer Testing, 32, 1306-1312.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.07.014

[18]   Alsoufi, M.S. and Elsyeed, A.E. (2017) Warping Deformation of Desktop 3D Printed Parts Manufactured by Open Source Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) System. International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 17, 7-16.

[19]   Alsoufi, M.S. and Elsayed, A.E. (2017) How Surface Roughness Performance of Printed Parts Manufactured by Desktop FDM 3D Printer with PLA+ Is Influenced by Measuring Direction. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 5, 211-222.

[20]   Rezayat, H., et al. (2015) Structure-Mechanical Property Relationship in Fused Deposition Modelling. Materials Science and Technology, 31, 895-903.
https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000010

[21]   Nevin, H. and Mehrdad, H. (2014) Deposition Direction-Dependent Failure Criteria for Fused Deposition Modeling Polycarbonate. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 20, 221-227.
https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2013-0039

[22]   Letcher, T. and Waytashek, M. (2014) Material Property Testing of 3D-Printed Specimen in PLA on an Entry-Level 3D Printer. Advanced Manufacturing, 2A, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2014-39379

[23]   Bagsik, A. and Schoppner, V. (2011) Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling Parts Manufactured with Ultem*9085. ANTEC, 2, 1294-1298.

[24]   Zhong, W., et al. (2001) Short Fiber Reinforced Composites for Fused Deposition Modeling. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 301, 125-130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01810-4

[25]   Mireles, J., et al. (2013) Development of a Fused Deposition Modeling System for Low Melting Temperature Metal Alloys. Journal of Electronic Packaging, 135, 011-008-1-011008-6.
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007160

[26]   Zein, I., et al. (2002) Fused Deposition Modeling of Novel Scaffold Architectures for Tissue Engineering Applications. Biomaterials, 23, 1169-1185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-0

[27]   Allahverdi, M., et al. (2001) Processing of Advanced Electroceramic Components by Fused Deposition Technique. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 21, 1485-1490.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00047-4

[28]   Masood, S.H. and Song, W.Q. (2004) Development of New Metal/Polymer Materials for Rapid Tooling Using Fused Deposition Modelling. Materials & Design, 25, 587-594.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.009

[29]   Dong, W.P., Sullivan, P.J. and Stout, K.J. (1992) Comprehensive Study of Parameters for Characterizing Three-Dimensional Surface Topography I: Some Inherent Properties of Parameter Variation. Wear, 159, 161-171.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(92)90299-N

[30]   Dong, W.P., Sullivan, P.J. and Stout, K.J. (1993) Comprehensive Study of Parameters for Characterizing Three-Dimensional Surface Topography II: Statistical Properties of Parameter Variation. Wear, 167, 9-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(93)90050-V

[31]   Dong, W.P., Sullivan, P.J. and Stout, K.J. (1994) Comprehensive Study of Parameters for Characterising Three-Dimensional Surface Topography: III: Parameters for Characterising Amplitude and Some Functional Properties. Wear, 178, 29-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(94)90127-9

[32]   Dong, W.P., Sullivan, P.J. and Stout, K.J. (1994) Comprehensive Study of Parameters for Characterising Three-Dimensional Surface Topography IV: Parameters for Characterising Spatial and Hybrid Properties. Wear, 178, 45-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(94)90128-7

[33]   Thomas, T.R. (1981) Characterization of Surface Roughness. Precision Engineering, 3, 97-104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-6359(81)90043-X

[34]   Whitehouse, D. (2002) 2-Identification and Separation of Surface Features. Surfaces and Their Measurement, 16-47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-190399601-0/50002-5

[35]   Mordo, S., Popravko, V. and Barari, A. (2013) Study of the Effect of Coating Parameters and Substrates on 3D Surface Roughness in Diamond-Like-Carbon Coating Process. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46, 1861-1866.
https://doi.org/10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00585

[36]   Alsoufi, M.S. and Bawazeer, T.M. (2015) Quantifying Assessment of Touch-Feel Perception: An Investigation Using Stylus Base Equipment and Self-Touch (Human Fingertip). Journal of Engineering and Architecture, 1, 1-16.

[37]   Alsoufi, M.S. and Bawazeer, T.M. (2015) The Effect of Aggressive Biological Materials on a Painted Automotive Body Surface Roughness. American Journal of Nano Research and Applications, 3, 17-26.

[38]   Suker, D.K., et al. (2016) Studying the Effect of Cutting Conditions in Turning Process on Surface Roughness for Different Materials. World Journal of Research and Review (WJRR), 2, 16-21.

[39]   Alsoufi, M.S., et al. (2016) Experimental Study of Surface Roughness and Micro- Hardness Obtained by Cutting Carbon Steel with Abrasive WaterJet and Laser Beam Technologies. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 4, 173-181.

[40]   Bawazeer, T.M., et al. (2016) Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Salvadora Persica “Miswak” on the Acid Eroded Enamel Surface at Nano-Mechanical Scale. Materials Sciences and Applications, 7, 754-771.
https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2016.711059

[41]   Alsoufi, M.S., et al. (2016) Surface Roughness and Knoop Indentation MicroHardness Behavior of Aluminium Oxide (Al2O3) and Polystyrene (C8H8)n Materials. International Journal of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering, 16, 43-49.

[42]   Alsoufi, M.S., et al. (2017) Influence of Abrasive Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Surface Texture Quality of Carrara Marble. Journal of Surface Engineered Materials and Advanced Technology, 7, 25-37.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jsemat.2017.72003

[43]   Alsoufi, M.S., et al. (2017) Abrasive WaterJet Machining of Thick Carrara Marble: Cutting Performance vs. Profile, Lagging and WaterJet Angle Assessments. Materials Sciences and Applications, 8, 361-375.
https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2017.85025

[44]   Alsoufi, M.S. (2011) A High Dynamic Response Micro-Tribometer Measuring-Head, in School of Engineering. University of Warwick, Coventry.

[45]   Ferreira, R.T.L., et al. (2017) Experimental Characterization and Micrography of 3D Printed PLA and PLA Reinforced with Short Carbon Fibers. Composites Part B: Engineering, 124, 88-100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.013

[46]   Kumbhar, N.N. and Mulay, A.V. (2016) Finishing of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Printed Parts by CO2 Laser. 6th International & 27th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR-2016), Maharashtra, 63-67.

[47]   Galantucci, L.M., et al. (2015) Analysis of Dimensional Performance for a 3D Open-Source Printer Based on Fused Deposition Modeling Technique. Procedia CIRP, 28, 82-87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.014

[48]   Kechagias, J., et al. (2014) Surface Roughness Optimization of Prototypes Produced by Polyjet Direct 3D Printing Technology. In: M.G. Karlaftis, N.D. Lagaros and M. Papadrakakis, Eds., OPT-i International Conference on Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization 2014, Kos Island, 2877-2888.

[49]   Jin, Y., Wan, Y. and Liu, Z. (2017) Surface Polish of PLA Parts in FDM Using Dichloromethane Vapour. MATEC Web Conf., 95, Article ID: 05001.
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20179505001

[50]   Li, Y., et al. (2017) Cost, Sustainability and Surface Roughness Quality—A Comprehensive Analysis of Products Made with Personal 3D Printers. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 16, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.10.001

[51]   Hambali, R.H., Cheong, K.M. and Azizan, N. (2017) Analysis of the Influence of Chemical Treatment to the Strength and Surface Roughness of FDM. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 210, Article ID: 012063.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/210/1/012063

[52]   Gibson, I., Rosen, D. and Stucker, B. (2015) Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing. Springer-Verlag, New York, XXI, 498.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3

[53]   Nuez, P.J., et al. (2015) Dimensional and Surface Texture Characterization in Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) with ABS Plus. Procedia Engineering, 132, 856-863.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.570

[54]   esun. http://www.esunchina.net

 
 
Top