Back
 JFRM  Vol.6 No.4 , December 2017
Research on Internet Consumer Financial Products Usage Intention—Taking College Students as an Example
Abstract: With the rise of Internet consumer finance, it has greatly promoted the prosperity of the stage consumption market, and the college students group is a market with great development space and untapped market. In this research background, this article combines the technology acceptance model and the rational acceptance model, and introduces consumer innovation and perceived risk to explore the influence of consumers on the willingness of e-commerce Internet consumer financial products. The study found that perceived usefulness and willingness to use had a significant positive correlation, and that perceived risk and willingness to use had a significant negative correlation. Perceived ease of use and subjective norms have a significant positive effect on perceived usefulness; Consumer innovation and perceived ease of use have significant positive impact, and consumers’ innovation and perceived risk have significant negative impact. The conclusions of this study enrich the study of willingness to use, and put forward relevant marketing strategies for enterprises to promote and occupy market share.
Cite this paper: Cai, Y. (2017) Research on Internet Consumer Financial Products Usage Intention—Taking College Students as an Example. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 6, 375-388. doi: 10.4236/jfrm.2017.64027.
References

[1]   Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. Action Control. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 11-39.

[2]   Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

[3]   Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking. In D. Cox (Ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior (pp. 389-398). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[4]   Chen, W. P. (2011). Life Style, Consumer Innovation and New Product Purchase Behavior Relationship. Economic Management, 2, 94-101.

[5]   Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

[6]   Deng Z. W., & Lu Y. B. (2007). Empirical Analysis and Comparison of Service Adoption Model of Mobile Banking. Industrial Engineering and Management, 6, 59-65.

[7]   Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting E-Services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Facets Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 451-474.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3

[8]   Fishbein, M. (1963). An Investigation of the Relationship between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude toward That Object. Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs, 16, 233-239.
https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676301600302

[9]   Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

[10]   Hofstede, F, T., & Wedel, M. (1999). A Cross-National Investigation into the Individual and National Cultural Antecedents of Consumer Innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 63, 55-69.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1251945

[11]   Huang, H., Liu, L., & Wang, J. J. (2008). TAM-Based Mobile Content Service Adoption Analysis. Nankai Management Review, 11, 42-47.

[12]   Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The Components of Perceived Risk. Advances in Consumer Research, 3, 382-383.

[13]   Klopping, I. M., & Kiuney, E. M. (2004). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model and the Task-Technology Fit Model Information Technology. Learning and Performance Journal, 22, 35-45.

[14]   Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing Management the Millennium Edition. London Prentice Hall International Inc.

[15]   Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhang, Y. (2000). The Technology Acceptance Model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29, 269-282.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00076-2

[16]   Liu, D. (2011). International Comparison of Consumer Finance Development Modes and References. Journal of Central University of Finance and Economics, No. 1, 27-43.

[17]   Liu, S. L. (2011). Structural Measurement of Consumers Innovativeness and the Impact on Innovative Behavior. Commercial Economy and Management, No. 233, 81-90.

[18]   Midgley, D, F., & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 229-242.
https://doi.org/10.1086/208701

[19]   Park, J., Lee, D., & Ahn, J. (2004). Risk-Focused E-Commerce Adoption Model: A Cross-Country Study. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 7, 6-30.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2004.10856370

[20]   Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach (Vol. 9, p. 476). New York, NY: Free Press.

[21]   Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

[22]   Wang, J., Liao, L., & Zhang, J. B. (2010). A Review of Consumer Finance Research (pp. 5-29). Economic Research.

[23]   Xu, C. J., Wang, Y. Y., & Huang, P. (2011). Study on College Students’ Mobile Internet Access from the Perspective of TAM Model. Modern Educational Technology, 21, 97-102.

 
 
Top