Back
 OJCE  Vol.7 No.4 , December 2017
Effect of Eccentric Shear Stiffness of Walls on Structural Response of RC Frame Buildings
Abstract: Current research study consists of determining the optimum location of the shear wall to get the maximum structural efficiency of a reinforced concrete frame building. It consists of a detailed analysis and design review of a seven-story reinforced concrete building to understand the effect of shear wall location on the response of reinforced concrete structures when subjected to different earthquake forces. Three trail locations of shear walls are selected and their performance is monitored in terms of structural response under different lateral loads. Required objectives are achieved by obtaining design and construction drawings of an existing reinforced concrete structure and modeling it on Finite Element Method (FEM) based computer software. The structure is redesigned and discussed with four different configurations (one without shear wall and three with shear walls). Main framing components (Beams, Columns and Shear walls) of the superstructure are designed using SAP 2000 V. 19.0 whereas substructure (foundation) of RC building was designed using SAFE. American Concrete Institute (ACI) design specifications were used to calculate the cracked section stiffness or non-linear geometrical properties of the cracked section. Uniform Building Code (UBC-97) procedures were adopted to calculate the lateral earthquake loading on the structures. Structural response of the building was monitored at each story level for each earthquake force zone described by the UBC-97. The earthquake lateral forces were considered in both X and Y direction of the building. Each configuration of shear wall is carefully analyzed and effect of its location is calibrated by the displacement response of the structure. Eccentricity to the lateral stiffness of the building is imparted by changing the location of shear walls. Results of the study have shown that the location of shear wall significantly affects the lateral response of the structure under earthquake forces. It also motivates to carefully decide the center of lateral stiffness of building prior to deciding the location of shear walls.
Cite this paper: Saleem, M. (2017) Effect of Eccentric Shear Stiffness of Walls on Structural Response of RC Frame Buildings. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 7, 527-538. doi: 10.4236/ojce.2017.74035.
References

[1]   Ashour, S.A. and Abdel-Rahman, H.H. (1994) Application of Seismic Risk Analysis and Earthquake Simulation Methods to the Western Region in Saudi Arabia lKAU. Engineering Science, 6, 3-23.

[2]   Yakut, A. (2003) Preliminary Seismic Performance Assessment Procedure for Existing RC Buildings. Journal of Engineering Structures, 135, 1177-1190.

[3]   Sadek, A.W. and Sobaih, M.E. (1992) Approximate Seismic Analysis of in Elastic Asymmetric Structures. Journal of Engineering Structures, 14, 49-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(92)90007-D

[4]   Karayannis, C. G., Favvata, M. J. and Kakaletis, D.J. (2011) Seismic Behaviour of Infilled and Pilotis RC Frame Structures with Beam-Column Joint Degradation Effect. Journal of Engineering Structures, 33, 2821-2831.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.06.006

[5]   Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2005) Assessment of Current Nonlinear Static Procedures for Seismic Evaluation of Buildings. Journal of Engineering Structures, 29, 305-316.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.012

[6]   De Luca, F., Verderame, G.M. and Manfredi, G. (2014) Eurocode-Based Seismic Assessment of Modern Heritage RC Structures. Journal of Engineering Structures, 74, 96-110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.015

[7]   Lee, H.-S. and Woo, S.-W. (2001) Seismic Performance of a 3-Story RC Frame in a Low-Seismicity Region. Journal of Engineering Structures, 24, 719-734.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00135-3

[8]   Shuraim, A., Al-Haddad, M., Al-Zaid, R., Mirza, R. and Al-Sheref, K. (2007) Seismic Provisions in the Saudi Building Code. Proceedings of the 7th Saudi Engineering Conference (SEC7), Riyadh, 3-5 December 2007, SEC-119.

[9]   Shuraim, A. (2007) Performance of Push over Procedure in Evaluating the Seismic Adequacy of Reinforced Concrete Frames. King Saud University, Riyadh.

[10]   Ashraf, H. and Stephen, P. (1998) Practical Three Dimensional Nonlinear Static Pushover Analysis. Structure Magazine, Winter.

[11]   Chan, C.M. and Zou, X.K. (2002) Optimal Inelastic Drift Design of Reinforce Concrete Structures under Pushover Loading. The 2nd China-Japan-Korea Joint Symposium on Optimization of Structural and Mechanical Systems, Busan, 4-8 November 2002, 779-784.

[12]   Dhileep, M., Trivedi, A. and Bose, P.R. (2011) Behavior of High Frequency Modal Responses in Nonlinear Seismic Analysis. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 1, 723-731.

[13]   Whittaker, A., Constantnou, M. and Tsopelas, P. (2007) Displacement Estimates for Performance-Based Seismic Design. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124, 905-912.

[14]   Thakur, S.S. and Saklech, M. (2017) Addition of Shear Walls to Enhance the Structural Stability of Medium Rise Structures. Indian Journal of Scientific Research, 14, 506-511.

[15]   Uniform Building Code (1997) International Conference of Building Officials, USA.

[16]   American Concrete Institute (2014) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. American Concrete Institute, USA.

[17]   Saudi Building Code (2007) National Committee of Saudi Building Code, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

 
 
Top