Back
 OJCE  Vol.7 No.4 , December 2017
Preliminary k-Values of Unbound Natural Quartzitic Gravels for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design
Abstract: The generalized constitutive model relating the resilient modulus (MR) of flexible pavement layer materials to stress state, adopted by the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), contains a set of constants known as k-values (k1, k2, and k3) which are associated with the physical state of the layer materials. In Ghana, natural gravels constitute the predominant and sometimes the sole layer materials for most flexible pavements yet representative k-values of gravel materials, have not been determined to permit full application and implementation of the mechanistic-empirical design concept to pavements involving such materials. In this study, k-values characterising typical natural quartzitic gravels used for road construction in the country were derived by regression techniques from MR values determined using laboratory repeated load triaxial test. Using multiple linear regression technique, correlation relationships were then developed between the k-values and the physical properties of the gravels, namely, percentages of materials passing the 9.5 mm (P9.5) and 2.0 mm (P2.0) sieves, liquid limit (LL), maximum dry density (ρdmax), and optimum moisture content (wopt). The regression analysis returned k1 values which ranged between 441 and 958 with a mean of 516; k2 which varied between 0.0636 and 0.2168 with a mean value of 0.1216; and, k3 values which ranged between 0.1257 and 3.1590 with a mean value of 1.723. Contrary to what is mostly reported in literature, the analysis returned positive k3 values for all but one gravel material, suggesting stress hardening under octahedral shear stress for those materials. While an expanded sample base is required to fully characterize the whole gamut of natural gravels used in pavement construction in the country, this study on limited quartzitic gravel samples has given a good indication of strong linear correlations between the k-values and the index properties of the gravels, to permit estimates of the constants for such gravels be made where capability and opportunity for conducting resilient modulus tests do not exist.However, further work is recommended to fully characterise the exact nature of k3 values for quartzitic gravels in the country.
Cite this paper: Obeng, E. , Tuffour, Y. , Obeng, D. and Koranteng-Yorke, B. (2017) Preliminary k-Values of Unbound Natural Quartzitic Gravels for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 7, 509-526. doi: 10.4236/ojce.2017.74034.
References

[1]   Seed, H.B., Chan, C.K. and Lee, C.E. (1962) Resilience Characteristics of Subgrade Soils and Their Relation to Fatigue Failures in Asphalt Pavements. Proceedings, First International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, Ann Arbor, 20-24 August 1962.

[2]   George, K.P. (2004) Prediction of Resilient Modulus from Soil Index Properties. Final Report, FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-04-172, Mississippi Department of Transportation Research Division, Jackson.

[3]   Kim, S., Gopalakrishnan, K. and Ceylan, H. (2012). Unbound Material Characterization with Nottingham Asphalt Tester. Construction Materials, 165, 355-365.
https://doi.org/10.1680/coma.11.00007

[4]   Barksdale, R.D. (1993) The Aggregate Handbook. National Stone Association, Washington DC.

[5]   Dunlap, W.S. (1963) A Report on a Mathematical Model Describing the Deformation Characteristics If Granular Materials. Technical Report 1, Project 2-8-62-27, TTl, Texas A&M University, College Station.

[6]   Moossazadeh, J. and Witczak, M.W. (1981) Prediction of Subgrade Moduli for soil That Exhibits Nonlinear Behaviour. Transportation Research Record 810, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 9-17.

[7]   Uzan, J. (1985) Characterization of Granular Materials. Transportation Research Record 1022, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 52-59.

[8]   Witczak, M.W. and Uzan, J. (1988) The Universal Airport Pavement Design System, Report I of V: Granular Material Characterization. University of Maryland, College Park.

[9]   National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) (2004) Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. National Cooperative Highway Research Program 1-47A Report. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

[10]   Ji, R., Siddiki, N., Nantung, T. and Kim, D. (2014) Evaluation of Resilient Modulus of Subgrade and Base Materials in Indiana and Its Implementation in MEPDG. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, Article ID: 372838, 14.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/372838

[11]   Li, Q., Xiao, D.X., Wang, K.C.P., Hall, K.D. and Qiu, Y. (2011) Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG): A Bird’s-Eye View. Journal of Modern Transportation, 19, 114-133.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325749

[12]   Malla, R.B. and Joshi, S. (2007) Resilient Modulus Prediction Models Based on Analysis of LTPP Data for Subgrade Soils and Experimental Verification. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133, 491-504.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:9(491)

[13]   Hanifa, K., Abu-Farsakh, M.Y. and Gautreau, G.P. (2015) Design Values of Resilient Modulus for Stabilized and Non-Stabilized Base. Report No. FHWA/LA.14/1521, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

[14]   Mohammad, L.N., Huang, B., Puppala, A. and Allen, A. (1999) Regression Model for Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils. Transportation Research Record 1442, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 47-54.
https://doi.org/10.3141/1687-06

[15]   Santha, B.L. (1994) Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils: Comparison of Two Constitutive Equations. Transportation Research Record 1462, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 79-90.

[16]   Dai, S. and Zollars, J. (2002) Resilient Modulus of Minnesota Road Research Project Subgrade Soil. Transportation Research Record 1786, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 20-28.
https://doi.org/10.3141/1786-03

[17]   Drumm, E.C., Reeves, J.S., Madgett, M.R. and Trolinger, W.D. (1997) Subgrade Resilient Modulus Correction for Saturation Effects. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123, 663-670.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:7(663)

[18]   Hicks, R.G. and Monismith, C.L. (1971) Factors Influencing the Resilient Properties of Granular Material. Transportation Research Record 345, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 15-31.

[19]   Barksdale, R.D. and Itani, S.Y. (1989) Influence of Aggregate Shape on Base Behaviour. Transportation Research Record 1227, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 173-182.

[20]   Thom, N.H. and Brown, S.F. (1989) The Mechanical Properties of Unbound Aggregates from Various Sources. Unbound Aggregates in Roads: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Unbound Aggregates in Roads, Nottingham, 130-142.

[21]   Han, Z. and Vanapalli, S.K. (2015) Model for Predicting Resilient Modulus of Unsaturated Subgrade Soil Using Soil-Water Characteristic Curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 52, 1605-1619.
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0339

[22]   Schwartz, C.W., Li, R., Ceylan, H., Kim, S. and Gopalakrishnan, K. (2013) Global Sensitivity Analysis of Mechanistic-Empirical Performance Predictions for Flexible Pavements. Transportation Research Record 2368, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 12-23.
https://doi.org/10.3141/2368-02

[23]   MRH (2007) Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Works. Ministry of Roads and Highways, Accra.

[24]   Gidigasu, D.M. (1976) Mode of Formation and Geotechnical Characteristics of Laterite Materials of Ghana in Relation to Soil Forming Factors. Building and Road Research Institute (BRRI), Kumasi.

[25]   Ghana Highway Authority (GHA) (1997) Standard Methods of Test for Soils and Gravels Used in Pavement Works.

[26]   ASTM D4318-10 (2010) Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils.

[27]   AASHTO T307-99 (2003) Standard Method of Test for Determining the Resilient Modulus of Soils and Aggregate Materials. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC.

[28]   Rada, G. and Witczak, M.W. (1981) Comprehensive Evaluation of Laboratory Resilient Modulus Results for Granular Material. Transportation Research Record 810, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 23-33.

[29]   Maher, A., Bennert, T., Gucunski, N. and Papp, W.J. (2000) Resilient Modulus of New Jersey Subgrade Soils. FHWA Report No. 2000-01, Washington DC.

 
 
Top